Discussion Book——Critique of "Calculus"

Principal: Hello!

After the implementation of the “Calculus” competition award competition, I strongly disapprove of the students. Although the teacher’s original intention is to let the students do more good things and help others. It is a good idea. But the practice of "calculus" is wrong to swell the vanity of students. This "helping others to be happy" means helping others and being happy from the heart. If you say the purpose, that is: you have "accumulated" because of doing a good thing. But now it means: I help others, I have witnesses to prove that I can do well and can score, so I feel happy. Its purpose is: "integration." The difference between the two is that one is “true heart” and the other is “intentional”. "True" means real. "Italian" means "intention." In this way, this kind of game is not in love, but in harm!

Now I have given my classmates a subconscious mind, that is, they will be paid for, and they will be too lazy to ignore you. The implementation of this "calculus" has inspired students' potential "snobbery." This week, there have been a few things that have made me very dissatisfied: 1 A classmate does not want to be hygienic, and the other few students are vying to help him, but after asking this question, there is no point, the classmates It doesn't matter to him. 2 A classmate picked up the milk carton at the door and threw it back to the original place. After I saw it, I threw the garbage and threw it. Then I asked him why he was thrown back and thrown back to the original place. He smiled and said to me: "No one proves me, can't add points." 3 Some female students are vying to help the teacher change the test paper, I curiously ask Why are they so active; they say: "There are extra points!" Undoubtedly caused me to resent.

You said that this kind of good deeds should have been obligatory. When you see what you have taken from the heart and take the initiative to help, this is not about what purpose, what is intended, is not asking for return. Now it’s good, and it’s slowly forming a style of paid help. Isn’t it because of the extremely unreasonable rating of “calculus”? These "Chinese literary virtues" of "doing good things without leaving names" and "doing good things without asking for compensation" have all changed their nature. This "calculus" is a wrong decision.

In addition, the implementation of "calculus", but also stipulate what good things to do to add points. What is the rule? Is it not a good thing to say other good things? Don't you have to do other good things? Is it a good thing to help others to move things and teach others how to learn? So this is another wrong decision.

Classmates help the students to fetch water, play rice, and are in a relationship, but now they are in extra points. The students pick up the rubbish on the campus because they keep the campus clean, but now they want to add points. The classmates help the teacher to change the volume, so that the teacher Do less things, let the students know the results early, but now out of the extra points. However, students who did not like to do good deeds did not do it. The students who were originally helpful were either changing from "true intentions" to "intentions" or doing good things without leaving a name. Every time I heard someone who announced who was awarded by anybody who gave it, The ear hurts, probably it is not used to it!

Zeng Guofan’s book "The Four Trainings" is in the cloud: "Expanding virtue, doing good deeds, accumulating yin, and making the blessings of your own, and being safe and unacceptable." In this "doing good deeds", that is, only From the heart to the good, from the concept to the good, from the action to the good, is the evil to repair the good. "More yin", "Yinde" is a good thing for yourself, don't let people know, this is called Yinde. Do a good thing, spread it everywhere, be admired, while others praise you, you have already got the reward of doing good things, people praise you, so that when you do it, you will return, and Germany is accumulating. Not up. Therefore, good must be accumulated, it is hidden and not known, this is the real good thing. If the teacher does not understand this principle, he encourages students to do more good things. "Calculus" has changed the psychology and concept of doing good deeds to the bad. It is really a myriad! !

Not only is it against me, but many students are against it.

When this concept has not fully entered the students' minds, I am daring to ask the teachers to judge the unreasonable victims as early as possible, or to avoid the drawbacks described by me.

Students are poorly written, and they are recommended by friends. They are more offended and hope to understand. But after the teacher reads this book, he will immediately answer the students and decide as soon as possible so that the students can feel at ease.

Correspondence: Huo Yingqiao

Third day: 522501627