Scientific research report

I. The basic structure of the final report is a study of the end of the topic. The researcher introduces the research process objectively and comprehensively, summarizes and interprets the research results, and applies to the relevant departments for the completion of the article. It is the most important material in all materials of the subject research, and it is also the most important basis for the completion of research projects. The basic structure includes:
The title part - title, signature.
Body part -
Preface.
Theoretical basis.
Research objectives.
research method.
The main content of the study.
An overview of the research process.
Research results, conclusions and recommendations.
Problems or limitations of research.
End section - notes, references, appendices.
The final report should pay attention to the standardization of the basic format. Depending on the circumstances, we can make appropriate adjustments in the system. We oppose the format dull, but we cannot violate the basic format. Let's focus on a few issues with universality.
Second, the title of the report title should be clear. The general format of the title report is: "..." topic completion report.
The key point is that the topic of the topic should be specific and clear, accurately summarize the direction of research, the breadth and depth of research, and have novelty. The specific requirements are: 1 should be valuable and innovative. 2 The scope is neither too broad nor too narrow. 3 It is best to include research scope, objects, content, and methods. 4 The content of the topic is best involved in two variables. 5 questions should not be in the form of interrogative sentences. 6 topics to avoid value judgment. 7 It is not advisable to use excessively modified and literary topics. 8 use the word specification, avoid making.
If the problem is found to be inappropriate or the study has no value during the research process, the research must be terminated, the research topic re-adjusted, and the project approval unit submitted. A new topic should be written in the final report with instructions.
Third, the selection and application of theoretical basis should be based on the scientific basis of the research, which is the basis of the topic selection. It is the theoretical basis for the researcher to pre-assign certain hypotheses to the research questions and the theoretical basis for guiding the research process.
Selecting the theoretical basis should prevent three situations: 1 no "argument" can be relied upon; 2 "argument" is difficult to rely on; 3 big "on argument" is small "dependence"; The scientificity, advancement, pertinence and profoundness of the selected theory are directly related to the level of educational science research.
Educational theories have strong temporal and realistic pertinence, and some have their limitations. They cannot be used when they are used.
Fourth, the education and scientific research process should be objective and clear. The summary of the research process must conform to the characteristics of the research type. There are many classification standards for educational scientific research methods, so there are many types of educational research, such as basic research, applied research, development research; theoretical research, experimental research, research, and chasing research; exploratory research, descriptive research, and explanatory research. and many more. For various studies, especially applied research and experimental research should be clearly defined.
Apply research to apply or test theory and evaluate its role in solving practical problems in education. Most of China's small educational research is applied research.
The experimental research is based on the purpose of research, using a certain human means to actively intervene or control the occurrence and development process of the research object, in order to explore and verify the research process of the causal relationship of the research phenomenon. Educational experiments can be divided into exploratory experiments, confirmatory experiments, and generalized experiments.
It is necessary to talk about educational action research, which is different from educational experiments. Educational action research is an educational decision-maker, principal, and teacher who actively uses relevant theories, knowledge, and methods to solve practical problems that need to be solved urgently. It puts problem solving first, emphasizes the combination of research process and action process, focuses on researchers and actors, requires actors to participate in research, and reflects on actual work.
In the research, there is often a situation in which the two blend and infiltrate and supplement one with the other. Different research types have different research processes. Educational experimental research and general educational research are different in the expression of the research process. The article you are browsing is organized, and the copyright belongs to the original author and the original source.
1. The expression of the educational experimental research process should reflect three stages:
1 preparation stage. Select topics, form experimental hypotheses, determine experimental independent variables and factors, define operational definitions, develop measures to control unrelated variables, select subjects, assign experimental or control groups, select measurement method tools, formation plans, and work plans.
2 implementation stage. Execute experimental programs, programs, observe experimental subjects, record required data, data and process. In the process of executing the experimental program and program, there are pre-test and post-test design. The pre-test sometimes brings trouble to the experiment, so not all experiments must be pre-tested, but the post-test is indispensable.
3 summary stage. Analyze the data, summarize the research results, and form the research conclusions. .
2. The overview of the general research process should include:
1 Introduction to the time, place, subjects, and people involved in the study.
2 Review of problems, design and action steps, process measures; description and arrangement of relevant phenomena observed and felt.
3 Make judgments on the course of action and results, analyze relevant phenomena and causes, and explore regularity and argumentation based on new findings, new understandings, and new thinking.
The outline should emphasize the objective attitude, based on facts, the description of the facts should be clear, and the sentence should be based on the principle of neutrality. Try to avoid using the first person.
V. The presentation of research results and conclusions should be concise and consistent with scientific research results, such as solving problems, raising awareness, and developing developments.
The opinions and points of some of the articles written should be summarized, and the published articles list the charts.
If the main research results are huge macros, the outline structure of the article should be listed.
There is generally discussion and analysis in the presentation of results, that is, to discuss the limitations of the research, the issues to be solved, the value of the application, and the possibility of promotion.
The conclusion is that the answer to the question of the subject research is the crystallization of the whole study. Its contents include: judgments on the overallity of the research, summative insights into the research hypotheses; tips and strategies for solving practical problems; pointing out unresolved problems; and suggesting ways and means for further research. The statement of conclusion should be refined, distinct, and left behind.
The research level of the subject can be divided into the level of intuition observation, the level of exploration reason, the level of migration promotion, and the level of theoretical research. Throughout the study of China's small education projects in the city, most of them still only reach the level of the first and second levels, and must maintain a modest and prudent attitude in self-evaluation.