What kind of life is considered cost-effective?

Liu Huan said with emotion on the show that the current person is too utilitarian. He went back to chat with the students. The other party said that he wanted to take French, and he felt that the price was not high. He was hesitant. He is speechless: I want to learn and learn, how can I still find the price?

As a national treasure artist, it is very understandable to express a student's utilitarian thinking. But from the perspective of the general public, we can fully understand the student's pursuit of cost performance. Now, when people do things, do they still consider cost-effective? Everything has to be deliberately and unintentionally measured by the relationship between input and output, and it is appropriate to do it.

This is also understandable. But the problem is that the output we have identified is usually limited to the "fame and fortune" level. It can be promoted and made rich, can make a name for itself, and can gain the benefits of being tangible and tangible.

I spent two years studying a French language, so I was looking for a job in the future. If I didn’t use it when I was looking for a job, wouldn’t I lose it?

I’m trying to find a good job in the future. If the income position is not high, is it not big?

Studying and studying for a lifetime, the results are a lot, but there is no official or part-time job until retirement, even the professor is not, just white...

In short, everything is measured by fame and fortune. It is useful to be able to exchange the usefulness of the jade food. The benefits of being able to put gold on your face are good. It is a good life to make a life of fame and fortune.

This seems to be the common sense of modern society. But this is not scientific.

It is said that Confucius was also very poor in the past, and he had to rely on Zigong to spend money to go out to teach, but how about his life price?

Li Bai is even poorer. Most of the time he earned no more flowers. In the end, he was poor and sick and died on the road. In terms of the current price/performance point of view, the points may be lower than the farmers. Or, if his mother is expected to end the situation, he may not send him to read and read the words at all. How good is it to farm at home, what is the use of those sour poems?

"What is the use?" is a too sinister question. It is a knife that kills people without blood. The ideals of countless young people are all poked by the seniors with this question.

However, if you follow this pragmatic logic, Tang Yin will learn from it, and Van Gogh will paint, and Sima Qian will write "Historical Records". Cao Xueqin is even more stunned by "Dream of Red Mansions". What is the use? Wowo capsules suffer and suffer for a lifetime, but who is not waiting to see, is there time and energy, is it better to fill the stomach with a rough job?

I have a long-distance Agong, who has a courageous mind. She has been a village chief for 40 years in the countryside. The villagers still disagreed with his retirement in their 70s. The old man took the village people to build roads, build large-scale dairy cows, build milk powder factories, and build schools. The life and education standards of their villages are much higher than those of the surrounding villages. University students come out one by one. The young man’s daughter-in-law is looking for it in other villages, and the grandmother’s prestige is even more unparalleled.

A few days ago, my dad talked about an old thing: the village once lost a calf that was born for three days. After two years, the grandfather went to the county to do things. When he saw a group of cows on the road, he immediately got off and said One of them said that it was the XX of the XX village. This is the cow lost in our village. The man heard the words, and even the replies did not deny it, let the prince bring the cow back.

There are many things like this. The people in the village are very appreciative and respectful to Agong.

The old man did not pass the famous brand in his life, and there was not much deposit. His reputation was in the neighboring village, but no one knew it when he came out of the county. If he only uses the amount of money that a large official earns, he may not be as good as a section chief in his life. However, a person has given thousands of people happiness by himself, and he has lived happily, practically, and has a sense of accomplishment. Isn't this kind of life cost-effective? How about the head of the section chief who is inactive in a big institution? How about a nouveau riche who is struggling with hard work? It should not be lower.

So if you have to count one thing, one profession, and the price/performance ratio of life, I think that even if fame and fortune must be an indicator that cannot be ignored, it must also bring happiness, personal value, contribution to others, etc. And so many factors are added.

For example, judging the value of a dish, can not only be based on how much meat is inside, the hue, taste, and nutrition are all reasonable.

When we go to the restaurant to order, the first thing to consider is the taste and nutrition of a dish, not just a few pieces of meat inside. But why did we have the right thing to do when we chose to do something big in life?