Year-end company employee performance appraisal and analysis

R>×××× Year is a year in which the company faces various difficulties and tests. In order to objectively, fairly, fairly, and realistically evaluate each employee's performance in the year of ××××, find out the direction of future efforts, and organize the performance appraisal of the year-end employees. The administrative personnel department has issued an assessment notice, and the scope of the assessment. The specific requirements of the methods, steps, objectives, etc. are presented. The overall situation of the employee performance appraisal is summarized as follows:
×××× Year-end company employee performance appraisal situation and analysis
×××× Year is a year in which the company faces various difficulties and tests. In order to objectively, fairly, fairly, and realistically evaluate each employee's performance in the year of ××××, find out the direction of future efforts, and organize the performance appraisal of the year-end employees. The administrative personnel department has issued an assessment notice, and the scope of the assessment. The specific requirements of the methods, steps, objectives, etc. are presented. The overall situation of the employee performance appraisal is summarized as follows:
I. Scope of this assessment: For those who are employed by the company for more than one month, they do not include the company's leadership team and departmental positions.
Second, the results of this performance appraisal:
department
total people
Number of participants
Participation rate
among them
excellent
Number of people
excellent
rate%
good
Number of people
good
rate%
qualified
Number of people
qualified
rate%
Not fit
Number of cells
Failure rate%
Production department
×××
×××
××%
××
×.×%
××
××.×%
××
××.×%
×
×.×%
Marketing department
××
××
××%
×
×
××
××.××%
×
×.××%
×
×
food factory
×××
×××
××%
××
×.×%
×××
××%
×××
××%
×
×.×%
Quality Control Department
××
××
××%
×
××%
××
××%
×
×
×
×
Purchasing Department
××
××
××%
×
××.×%
×
××.×%
×
××%
×
×
Finance department
××
××
××%
×
×%
××
××%
×
×
×
×
politician
××
××
××%
×
×
××
××.×%
×
××.×%
×
×
total
×××
×××
××%
××
×.×%
×××
××.×%
×××
××.×%
×
×.×%
Third, the analysis of employee performance appraisal results:
×, overall analysis of assessment results
The total number of participants in this assessment is ×××, and the participation rate is XX%; the total number of outstanding personnel in this assessment is ×× people, accounting for the total number of participants ×××%; the number of good candidates is ×××, accounting for the total number of participants × ×.×%; the number of qualified persons in the examination ××× people, accounting for the total number of participants ××.×%; the number of unqualified persons × people, accounting for ×.×% of the total number of participants; the overall assessment results are more than ×××× In the past six months, there has been a certain reduction, the excellent rate and good rate of various departments have been significantly reduced, and the production department and food factory have experienced unqualified rates. In the work of XX×Year, the employees in accordance with the company's spirit of pursuing excellence, challenge themselves and professional focus, strictly demanded themselves and continue to maintain the company's business performance in the leading position in the industry. The overall situation of the employee performance appraisal has basically maintained a positive correlation with the company's overall production and operation, reflecting the current status of the company's workforce, with many in the middle, most of them perform well, and the two are small.
From the analysis of the elements to be assessed, the employees' sense of responsibility, discipline, teamwork, and cost awareness have been further enhanced in the company's various training and management activities, and they are actively participating in the company's and departmental learning activities. The work skills and sense of responsibility have been gradually strengthened, and the overall quality of employees has been improved. However, the overall work innovation spirit of employees is insufficient, and business skills need to be further improved.
×. Classification analysis of appraisers: The appraisal is divided into four categories: team leader and above management personnel, production technicians, business personnel and office clerks.
Excellent assessment and good personnel are mainly concentrated in the team leader and above management personnel, some office clerks, business backbones and technical backbones. This part of the staff is the middle strength of the company. Their arsenal and performance play a key role in the completion of the annual work tasks of XXX. Judging from the results of this assessment, in the work of XX×Year, the performance of this part of the staff in terms of organizational leadership, responsibility, training authorization guidance, cost awareness and other assessment factors is relatively average, reflecting the company's grassroots supervisors and key positions. Strong, able to create a good working atmosphere with rigorous work style and strong sense of responsibility, but need to strengthen the work of post innovation, and at the same time strengthen the promotion of innovative work and challenging work of responsible departments, cultivate subordinates and their own Innovative spirit, breaking through the limitations of traditional thinking.
The qualified personnel are mainly distributed in production and business positions, non-technical and non-critical positions. This part of the staff can stick to the job, use certain work experience and good working attitude, and better complete their work. However, due to limitations of their own and departmental innovation challenges, work innovation needs to be greatly improved; self-learning, strengthening exchanges with relevant positions, accumulating more work experience, and improving work performance.
This assessment failed in the general labor positions of the production department and the food factory, and concentrated in the work attitude, responsibility and discipline. In the new year, all departments need to strengthen the staff management education and do a good job. Conversion work.
×. Departmental analysis
In this assessment, there is a certain gap between the excellent rate, good rate and pass rate of each department. The excellent rate of the Purchasing Department and the Quality Control Department is relatively high. Compared with the previous assessment, the excellent rate and good rate of each ministry have been significantly reduced. Among the assessment factors, the lower evaluation of the performance of the appraisers results in a lower overall rate of excellence, but employees can maintain a higher level of discipline, work attitude and work ability. Good assessment results. The good rate is not obvious among the various departments.
It can be seen from this phenomenon that, first of all, the assessment requirements of personnel in various departments and the requirements of personnel for themselves are relatively different due to the difference in job work. This gap causes different assessment results under the same assessment criteria; secondly, The distribution of posts in various departments and the overall level of personnel's overall quality directly lead to differences in assessment results; therefore, departments with lower scores in the assessment need to strengthen personnel management and training, and reduce the gap between personnel in the department. A good department must strictly control the assessment standards, open up the assessment results of employees, and promote the fairness of the assessment to promote the better work of excellent employees. The qualified employees strive to develop well and excellent employees.
×. Assessment project and content analysis
The overall employees of the company can guarantee the company's assessment standards in terms of work attitude and work efficiency. The self-assessment and organizational scores can be basically consistent, similar to the results of the first half of the year and the same period of last year, but the production and business personnel Compared with the same period of the year of ××××, there is a certain gap between the completion of the work objectives and performance, work tasks and other indicators, and the gap between the standards set by the company; the ability of ordinary staff to coordinate, the leadership ability of managers, and the spirit of innovation. There is a certain gap between the self-assessment and the company's assessment criteria. Therefore, the company needs to strengthen the training of relevant knowledge of employees in various positions and positions and the training of some employees, enhance the sense of responsibility and professionalism of employees, and improve the job skills of employees. And work ability, improve the comprehensive quality of grassroots employees, and thus enhance the competitiveness of enterprises.
×. All departments pay more attention to the assessment. They can organize relevant participants to study the assessment elements, unify the assessment criteria, ensure the fairness and fairness of the assessment, and organize the completion of various indicators and job specifications, and provide basis for employees to conduct self-evaluation. . All departments can analyze the assessment results objectively and fairly, find the advantages and disadvantages, and combine with the departmental comprehensive management.
××××year×month×day