Establish a correct view of political achievements

Improve the three democratic mechanisms and establish a correct view of political achievements

Huang Lianguo

Political achievements are the performance of party and government cadres who exercise the powers conferred by the people to perform their duties during their term of office. Creating political achievements and political achievements is an important goal of cadres in politics. It is an important criterion for party organizations and cadres to evaluate cadres. It is also a comprehensive reflection of cadres' knowledge, work attitude, professionalism, business ability and leadership standards. The concept of political achievements is the fundamental understanding and attitude of cadres on how to perform their duties and pursue what kind of political achievements. As for how to guide leading cadres to establish a correct view of political achievements, I believe that we must adhere to the path of democratization and improve the "three democratic mechanisms."

1. Improve the democratic selection mechanism and guide cadres to establish a correct view of political achievements

1. Adhere to the principle of combining morality and ethics, and establish the orientation of selecting and appointing people. To improve the democratic selection mechanism and guide leading cadres to establish a correct view of political achievements, the first is to guide the right candidates. The use of a cadre is equivalent to establishing a banner, which will guide, demonstrate and motivate the cadres; using a cadre is equivalent to sending out a wrong signal, which will dampen the enthusiasm of the cadres. It is necessary to use the developmental heroes and the cadres with actual achievements to select those cadres with correct political achievements and outstanding performances into the leadership team, and strive to guide the cadres' attention and excitement to the development, business, political achievements, and contributions. Really choose those cadres who are politically reliable, have the skills at work, and want the officers to be able to do things. Whoever chooses the most competent job will choose who will be used to make a career. For those cadres who are willing to sacrifice, work hard, and have outstanding political achievements, they should be commended and reused. Those who have good development intentions but do not have scientific methods should be enthusiastic to help them, and guide them correctly. If you have a low level of results, you should make timely adjustments; those who engage in "face engineering" and "image engineering" for quick performance, engage in short-term behavior, engage in bullying, harming people's interests, or resorting to fraudulent reputation. Resolutely punish. For those who have become history but have been proved by practice to be clearly outstanding achievements and major contributions, they must be used as an important basis for the promotion and appointment of cadres; and they have been regarded as outstanding achievements, but have been proved by practice to be false achievements or cause major Loss must be identified and accountable. Cadres who have been promoted and reused must be resolutely withdrawn. Adhere to the correct orientation of employing people, thus further inspiring the cadres to work boldly, to start a business, to form a strong atmosphere of diligence for the people, to work hard, and to work hard, so that more people can achieve better political achievements.

2. Improve the democratic evaluation system and evaluate the performance of the cadre work. For a long time, in the evaluation of the performance of leading cadres, there is a phenomenon of “three heavy three light”, that is, the impression of the superior leadership in the evaluation system, the satisfaction rate of the light public; the economic growth in the evaluation indicators, the light social humanities Development; in the content of the assessment, the evaluation of the performance of the "significant" performance, the evaluation of the "deep" performance and the "hidden" performance. An important reason for these phenomena is that since the democratic scientific evaluation system has not yet been established, it is necessary to guide leading cadres to establish a correct view of political achievements. Organizations at all levels must accelerate the construction of an objective, fair, democratic and transparent performance evaluation system, focusing on indicators. Improve on the basis, method, and participation. First, we must brainstorm and improve the assessment indicators. The assessment is the baton, and the assessment indicator is the direction of the baton. When designing assessment indicators, you should first listen to all aspects of opinions, and most cadres and people can be recognized as indicators. The assessment indicators should not only reflect the requirements of comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable development, but also prevent the design of assessment indicators from being too detailed and complicated, and the phenomenon that people are difficult to evaluate; it should not only highlight the assessment of economic growth and efficiency, but also prevent unduly prominent The number of indicators, one-sided pursuit of GDP, pure focus on digital growth and other bias; not only to assess the tangible "significant" performance, but also to assess the invisible "hidden" performance. For example, the current assessment should reduce industrial added value, fixed asset investment and other indicators and micro-indicators that reflect the development process, and increase the weight of indicators such as public health, science and technology education, environmental protection, urban management, and optimized economic development environment. Second, we must classify guidance and improve assessment methods. It is necessary to make overall use of the traditional target management method, key event method, three-dimensional evaluation method, and comprehensive assessment method. According to different departments, different positions, different duties and tasks, highlight different indicators and adopt different methods to conduct separate assessments. According to different aspects of political achievements, different methods such as quantification, qualitative, assessment, monitoring, and opinion polling can be used for assessment. For example, Sichuan Province is the first in the country to use the "party and government leading cadres to measure the number of linear assessment methods", and the practice of democratic evaluation of departmental cadres is worthy of the mirror. This method is characterized by the establishment of an indicator system, the collection of assessment data, the use of modern Scientific and technological means and mathematical analysis methods to measure cadres can minimize artificial and emotional factors and prevent the appearance of uniform evaluation results. Third, we must broaden the channels and expand the participation of the people. At present, in the evaluation of political achievements, we must focus on solving the problem of inconsistency between party organizations and people. It is necessary to change the phenomenon that a small number of leading cadres often do not correctly act as the subject of lower-level performance evaluation. It is important to let the people have full right to know and have an effective form of broad participation of the people. To improve the representation of those who participate in the performance appraisal, it is necessary to have leading cadres, grassroots cadres, and representatives of all sectors; to broaden the channels for assessment, both centralized and individual conversations must be conducted; Concentrated assessment and inspection, but also pay attention to the understanding of the usual situation. At the same time, it is necessary to explore the establishment of cadre performance publicity, public discussion, public evaluation system, open channels, let more people, regional economic and social development experts, social intermediaries participate, use modern networks to establish cadre political performance feedback system, improve performance evaluation Extensive, accurate, and scientific.

3. Advance the process of democratization and implement reform measures. In the reform of the cadre and personnel system, the most important thing is to promote the process of democratization, so as to promote the change of cadre management from job management to responsibility management, ensure the allocation efficiency of leadership positions and leaders, and ensure the selection of cadres. Fair work. After the introduction of the central “5+1” archives and the five systems of the provincial party committee, Changshan County, as one of the pilot counties for the comprehensive reform of the cadre and personnel system in the province, vigorously promoted the democratization process of cadre personnel system reform, and strived to perfect the democracy of selecting and employing people. A certain degree of breakthrough. The first is to focus on the democratization reform of the initial nomination of cadres. On the one hand, it regulates the nomination system for the democratic recommendation of the members of the National Committee, and the candidates for the appointment and exchange of the leading and cadres of the county, county and county government departments and the important positions of the townships and towns are initially nominated by the members of the National Committee, according to the recommendations of the members of the National Committee. The result determines the subject of the investigation. On the other hand, actively explore ways to initially nominate other leading cadres in the county, so that more people can participate and improve the accuracy of the initial nominations, thus democratizing the initial nominations of cadres at all levels. The second is to pay attention to the standard operation of the "three people" work. Expand the participation of the people in the selection of cadres, further standardize the definition of democratic appraisal, democratic appraisal, and democratic referrals in the cadre inspection and assessment, and clarify the different levels, different representatives, and different types of participants, so that the work of the "three peoples" is more extensive. Sex, representativeness and rationality, truly give the cadres the "good" and "bad" judgments and the "up" and "down" jurisdictions to the people, so that the "three people" work can better reflect the wishes of the people. The third is to focus on the innovation of democratic selection methods. While carrying out the work of leading cadres in public elections, we will explore the use of popular elections and public direct elections to select townships and departments, expand intra-party democracy and people's democracy, and enable party members and the public to have greater right to know the selection and appointment of leading cadres. Participation and choice.

Second, improve the democratic decision-making mechanism, and urge the cadres to establish a correct view of political achievements

1. Strengthen the sense of administration according to law and implement democratic decision-making within the legal framework. Dialysis of the case of Wang Huaizhong’s corruption in Anhui and the iron-clad incident in Jiangsu, the “image project” can be built on the horse. An important reason for deep thinking is that a few leading cadres did not make decisions according to law when making decisions. Do the administration according to law. Some of them are "misplaced" in their work, and they are used to seeing the leading organs at the same level as the decision-making level of the regulatory system rather than the executive level. They are keen to leave the rules and regulations and engage in new slogans and new regulations. Some work is "offside" and often exceeds Responsibilities and responsibilities, do something that should not be managed, can not be managed, and not well managed; some of the work is "absent", the management of the matter is not managed or managed. The existence of misplaced, offside and absent positions seriously affects the implementation of work and damages the construction of cadres. To this end, I believe that leading cadres must establish a correct concept of political achievements, and must first establish the concept of administration according to law. Specifically, it is necessary to strengthen the "three kinds of consciousness": First, strengthen the role consciousness and "give way" from the "misplaced" place. Leading organs at all levels must consciously regard this level as the executive layer of the legal system. When making decisions, we must consider the basis of laws and regulations. We must work hard to implement laws and regulations, and earnestly safeguard the seriousness of laws and regulations. Pursue the registration of registration, and can not surpass the laws and regulations to achieve new sensation, pursue a sensational effect, and engage in short-term behavior. The second is to strengthen the sense of responsibility and “retreat” from the “offside”. Work in strict accordance with the licenses, duties and tasks assigned by the regulations, and earnestly perform their duties and assume their respective responsibilities. The power belonging to the subordinates should be returned to the subordinates. The subordinates should not take care of the affairs of the subordinates. They must ensure that they can exercise their functions and duties and perform their duties conscientiously. They must not be inconspicuous, and they must be separated from each other. The third is to strengthen the sense of service and “complement” in the “absence”. Firmly establish the idea that "leadership is service", and truly realize what the grassroots think, the urgent needs of the grassroots, and the needs of the grassroots. It is important to do a good job in decompressing and solving problems at the grassroots level, and fully mobilize their work enthusiasm and creativity.

2. Improve various working mechanisms and enhance the scientific nature of democratic decision-making. A few leading cadres have an incorrect view of political achievements, which makes many decisions more or less unscientific, discontinuous and random. To ensure the scientific and democratic decision-making, the key is to improve the democratic decision-making mechanism. First, we must create a democratic atmosphere and form a pattern of participation in decision-making in many aspects. In decision-making, we must fully promote democracy, let knowledgeable experts speak, and if necessary, invite a number of consulting agencies to participate, broaden the decision-making ideas of the party committee and government, and promote the scientific decision-making. For example, through the establishment of advisory committees and expert advisory committees, the boundaries of regions, departments and industries are broken, experts and scholars from different backgrounds are invited to participate in decision-making, and their advices are carefully listened to, so that government decision-making consultations are complemented by mutual inspiration and comparatively identified. On the basis of. Second, we must unblock the channels of democracy, so that the social conditions and public opinion are fully expressed. It is necessary to further improve the existing systems such as the people's congress system, the political consultation system, and the petition system, and improve the government hotline, the reception day of the NPC deputies, and the leadership reception day, and establish a modern hearing system, a public opinion test system, and a public opinion survey system. For example, urban reconstruction and reservoir resettlement should be attended by representatives of the people in the relocated areas. The reform of state-owned enterprises should involve trade unions and employee representatives. The establishment of an industrial and commercial management system should involve enterprises to ensure that stakeholders and damaged parties can participate in the decision-making process. Third, we must achieve democratic openness, so that the decision-making process is always fair and transparent. Specifically, the discussion of major public decision-making and the phased plan should be announced to all sectors of the society in a timely manner; any decision involving public interest should be made public to the public; any party that involves the interests of the local group must let the relevant group know; Decisions in the industry sector should be notified to the relevant parties in advance. For example, governments and departments at all levels should establish a spokesperson system or set up a government information consultation site to systematically announce government decision-making information and answer various practical issues such as hotspots and focus of attention from all walks of life. Fourth, we must improve the rules of democratic deliberation and standardize the decision-making process. Administrative decision-making bodies at all levels shall further improve the rules of procedure and procedures for decision-making under the statutory framework of the system of director responsibility, and clearly define the scope of matters to be discussed at the meeting. Any major issue that should be discussed by the meeting should be decided through collective discussion. Individuals, including the executive head, have no right to make their own decisions without discussion at the meeting. Fifth, we must improve the accountability mechanism for decision-making. In accordance with the principle of equal rights and responsibilities, equal rights and responsibilities, clarify the responsibilities of decision-making mistakes. In terms of accountability, the law has clearly stipulated forms of responsibility such as recall, dismissal, and inquiry. At the same time, it should initiate simple and convenient forms of responsibility such as resignation and voluntary resignation, and link these forms of responsibility with decision-making mistakes.

3. Carry forward the spirit of seeking truth and being pragmatic, and do a good job in the implementation of all aspects of democratic decision-making. The spirit of seeking truth and being pragmatic is the ideological style and work style that leading cadres at all levels should uphold, and is also the fundamental way and means to achieve political achievements. Whether the work of all aspects of democratic decision-making is effectively implemented depends on whether the policy makers insist on the spirit of seeking truth and being pragmatic, and whether to promote the style of seeking truth and being pragmatic. Specific to the actual work, we have to work hard in three aspects. The first is to test whether "three matches" are achieved. That is, whether the leading cadres at all levels make decisions, do things, and do their work, whether they meet the requirements of administrative administration according to law, whether they conform to objective laws and local conditions, and whether they meet the wishes of the majority. The second is to do "three full considerations." That is, to promote a reform to fully consider its feasibility and the degree of social tolerance, and to formulate a policy to fully consider its social impact, a project should take full account of its market prospects, funding sources, technical conditions and impact on the future. Wait. The third is to grasp the "three unifications": that is, to proceed from the actual situation in the local department and maintain the unity of the central government's policy and spirit; to carry out creative work and conscientiously implement the unity of superior instructions; the unity of local interests and overall interests. It is necessary to prevent and oppose the particularity or creative work of excuses or localities to carry out the work of "distributionism and local protectionism with countermeasures under the policy", and to prevent and oppose the tendency of blindly following the trend. We must inherit and carry forward the fine work style of down-to-earth, always maintain the spirit of advancing with the times, pioneering and innovating, perseverance, and work hard, constantly enhancing the sense of mission, responsibility and urgency, focusing on practical, practical and practical. We will firmly grasp the current period of strategic opportunities that are very rare, use outstanding styles to create outstanding political achievements, and earnestly create tangible achievements in achieving, safeguarding, and developing the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the people.

Third, improve the democratic supervision mechanism to ensure that cadres establish a correct view of political achievements

Strengthening democratic supervision of leading cadres is an important guarantee for ensuring that leading cadres establish a correct view of political achievements. It is necessary to further broaden the channels of supervision, improve the supervision mechanism, give full play to the role of supervision within the party, supervision by public opinion, and organize supervision, and effectively solve the problem that the leading cadres should not be supervised by superiors, supervised by the same level, and not supervised by lower levels, and eliminate supervision and management. The dead end. Specifically, we must grasp a key, highlight two levels, and grasp the three links.

1. Grasp a key. Under the conditions of a market economy, the situation is complicated and ever-changing. If it is only based on the experience of individuals or a few people to determine major issues, it is inevitable that mistakes will occur. Therefore, focusing on major issues, major cadres' appointment and dismissal, important construction project arrangements, and large-scale capital use, how to effectively strengthen the supervision of the "number one", the key is to strengthen the construction of democratic centralism and the supervision of the team members. In place. First of all, the top leaders must have a strong sense of democracy and be good at creating a good democratic atmosphere. This is the key to the implementation of democracy. In presiding over the daily work of the party committee, we must closely contact the people, fully investigate and study, and pay attention to the voices of all aspects; after the formation of the party committee's agenda, seek the opinions of the members in advance and give the members sufficient time for brewing; when the party committee discusses and decides on major issues, Consciously participate in decision-making as an equal member, respect the opinions of a few people, welcome different opinions, and always put yourself in the organization and under the constraints of the system in dealing with the relationship between individuals and organizations. Second, other members of the team must have a strong sense of democratic participation and truly speak freely. In daily work, members should be based on their own duties, take care of the overall situation, and actively and constructively put forward constructive opinions and suggestions. When the party committee discusses and decides on major issues, it must be diligent in brainstorming, dare to express their opinions, and offer suggestions for collective decision-making. Third, we must conscientiously open a democratic life meeting for leading cadres and carry out criticism and self-criticism. Carry out mutual talks and criticisms, insist on telling the truth, telling the truth, telling the truth, openly and honestly, pushing others and others, eliminating differences, eliminating misunderstandings, and achieving true unity and unity in the political, ideological and operational aspects of party committee members.

2. Highlight two levels. First, the superiors supervise the subordinates, that is, the discipline inspection and supervision organs supervise the lower party and government organs and leading cadres in accordance with the cadre management authority, and actively explore the linkage mechanism with the people's congress and judicial supervision. For example, the patrol work is carried out, gradually expanding at the level and expanding in content, promptly correcting and preventing some abuses of power, and promoting leading cadres to be honest and diligent. We will improve and improve the politicians' honest and honest talks and talks, insist on saying hello early, remind them in time, and solve the problem of uncleanness in the bud. Strictly investigate and deal with cases of violation of laws and regulations, and disciplinary cases involving violations of disciplines and cadres in the leading cadres must be resolutely investigated and dealt with. The localities and departments that are not able to handle the case must be rectified within a time limit, and the responsibility for not handling the case, not carrying out the case, or even interfering with the case shall be investigated. The second is the public's supervision of the leadership. First, supervision is implemented through democratic appraisals. Implement the system of honesty, honesty, and honesty, and include the results of the appraisal and assessment into the integrity of the leading cadres as the basis for the selection and appointment; conduct democratic appraisal of law enforcement agencies, economic management departments and social service units, and cooperate with public opinion supervision. The combination reflects the supervision of the operation of power. Second, the implementation of supervision through government affairs. Governments and departments at all levels should deepen the openness of government affairs as an important part of political civilization construction and an important measure to implement democratic supervision. All matters involving the interests of the grassroots, enterprises and the people of the people must be made public. Establish and improve the party's internal information reporting system, the situation reflection system and the major decision-making opinions system, and give full play to the supervisory role of party members. Third, implement supervision through letters and visits. We will improve the management system for letters and visits, standardize the procedures for letters and visits, ensure the existence of complaints and reports, and make the problems reported by the people seriously dealt with, ensuring that the legitimate rights and interests of the whistleblower are not infringed, and effective supervision of the actions of leading cadres.

3. Grab three links. The first is supervision beforehand. We must give full encouragement and strong support to the enthusiasm, enterprising spirit and work enthusiasm of leading cadres, but we must clarify the motives for making decisions on leading cadres. The reminder reminds us that the cold water splashes cold water. When organizing the reelection, inspecting the team, and understanding the cadres, the dissuasion of the "blueprints", "designs" and "points" that are unrealistic in the minds of some cadres, the suppression of the suppression, can not take into account the face, blindly Relocate or cater to. The second is supervision in the matter. To implement the leadership behaviors and implement the measures, ways, means and operational status of the work deployment work, it is necessary to understand as much as possible, especially on the scale of the law, to see whether it is administrative according to law, and to guide if necessary. ,guide. For those cadres who have problems or are unscrupulous in their political achievements, they can be reminded, educated and corrected in the form of inspection feedback, pre-arrival talks, participation in democratic life meetings, and organization correspondence. At the same time, we must proceed from the care of the cadres, the problems found in the channels of the people's reflections or cadres' inspections, and on the basis of persisting in clarifying the facts, timely adopting salvage measures such as criticism, profanity, warnings, etc., so as to prevent micro-duration and avoid small brewing. It’s a big mistake. The third is after-the-fact supervision. Through annual assessments, letters and visits, departure audits, and re-election visits, the investigation and understanding of the performance of cadres should be criticized, and those who falsify and falsify should be dealt with, and the false promotion should be resolutely withdrawn.