On "Talking about Learning"

I just saw an article written by the Dutch friend, "Talking about Learning," and I found that there are many places worth discussing.

Let me talk about this article first, mainly to talk about the good and bad of learning and not learning. He said: The advantage of learning is that the long-term conference has good work, quality, and others have a culture. The disadvantage of not learning is that there is no work, no quality, and no one sees culture. He also said that only by studying hard, can you study hard.

Learning, first of all, is to pursue nobleness, pursue perfection, and leave a life without regrets. Full of economics, the book rich five cars are not necessarily a person who really knows how to learn. Those who really know how to learn are not necessarily perfect people. Those who can only read books, in this world, claim to be "cultured, have Self-cultivation, perfect people."

Secondly, although learning also includes good work, quality, and other people's cultural elements, the purpose can never be set as these insignificant "trace elements". To me, the main purpose of learning is to pursue nobleness. perfect.

In the end, learning is definitely not a good reading, only learning, there are thousands of ways to learn, sorry, can not be listed one by one, because there are too many methods. I just want to give one, such as watching TV, the effect of TV shows is even better than reading a book, it will help you to vividize the passionate TV program on the cold frozen words of the book, just like the recently broadcasted "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms", see When I was on TV, I was excited dozens of times when I was talking. My heart flew to the Warring States. But still have to remind everyone: Be careful.

Ok, the writing is exhausted, and everyone has any doubts, please put forward in the comments.