Four types of candidates are suitable for repeating, and four types of candidates are not suitable for repeating.

Four types of candidates are suitable for repeating, and four types of candidates are not suitable for repeating.

Part of the candidates with unsatisfactory results in the college entrance examination will choose to repeat, and they will continue to work hard for the ideal university for one year. So which candidates are suitable for repeat? The following four categories of candidates are more suitable for re-reading, and four candidates are not suitable for repeating.

Four types of candidates are suitable for repeating

Candidates with a strong desire to repeat. In order to pursue a better development prospects, some candidates are dissatisfied with the status quo, do not meet the current level of learning, are not satisfied with colleges and professions, and are willing to further change their lives through repetition.

A strong desire to repeat should be the heart of the candidate, not just the wishes of the parents. Candidates who have a strong desire to repeat their readings are likely to show strong self-control in their studies. They have a good attitude towards learning, strong psychological endurance, ability to exert subjective initiative, and some room for improvement in their performance. If the candidate is not willing, under the pressure of the parents, the reluctance to repeat, the effect will be very poor.

Candidates with clear re-reading goals. Candidates who choose to repeat should know which institutions and majors to take in the next year, and how much distance their strength is from this goal. If the target expectation is too high, the candidate who has a big gap with his own strength will not be able to repeat the result for one year.

Candidates with potential and room for improvement. Some candidates did not study hard in the first year of high school and high school, and their attitude was not correct. When they reached the third year of high school, they suddenly realized that they had studied hard, but because they were too short, they could not improve their scores in the college entrance examination. Such candidates have the potential for improvement and learning potential. There are excellent teachers to make a point, and with their own efforts, a year of re-reading will be greatly improved.

In addition, in the third year of high school, there was no suitable review method, no plan, no system, and no time for candidates to pass the exam. This type of candidate does not make full use of the good year of high school, can re-read for one year, and find a space for improvement by changing the learning method.

Four types of candidates are not suitable for repeating

Candidates with poor psychological quality. Candidates who have re-read have experienced a college entrance examination failure, generally more pessimistic, and more likely to be nervous and anxious about the exam. Therefore, candidates who choose to repeat are required to have a better psychological quality.

Candidates with higher college entrance examination scores. In previous years, there were always some high-scoring candidates who were not in key universities such as Peking University and Tsinghua University. They chose to repeat. However, for those candidates with a score of 600 or more, there is not much room for improvement in their performance, but their psychological burden is even greater. The results of the college entrance examination in the coming year may not be as good as this year. Therefore, candidates who have already been admitted are better off reading a relatively satisfactory profession.

Candidates who lack perseverance and binding. Re-reading for one year is a difficult year, and the perseverance of candidates is a great test. During the one-year re-reading period, candidates are required to have a hard-working spirit. Candidates do not choose to repeat if they do not have strong perseverance, are not prepared to suffer hardships, and are not binding.

Candidates who are forced to be helpless. Some candidates choose to repeat after listening to the parents' decision, and they don't have much motivation. If the candidate does not want to read it, parents should not force him. Otherwise, the candidates will not only learn to go in, but also waste financial resources. What is more serious is the waste of the child's precious time of the year.

[Users who have read this article also read the following excellent articles, you can also check it out! 】

[Re-read, are you ready? ] [Write to friends who are about to repeat]