6 bad habits in the college entrance examination

6 bad habits in the college entrance examination

Student test scores are determined by the interaction of multiple factors. In addition to ability, knowledge, skills, skills and mentality, good answering habits can not be ignored. In the long-term practice of teaching and proctoring, we found that many students do not pay attention to develop good answering habits, which leads to negligence loss, and even affects the future, and hates life. The following takes the language test as an example.

First, the reading question is not careful, the fixed thinking

Long-term large-scale simulation training is undoubtedly effective in improving students' ability to solve problems, but it is also easy to cause students' fixed thinking: It is customary to think that a certain type of knowledge is a fixed pattern. In the examination, once the problem appears slightly changed, the students are easy to stick to the old-fashioned, deceived and caused the loss.

Therefore, in the examination, students must be reminded: carefully and meticulously reading the title, there must be no mistakes such as "choosing the wrong one" as "choosing the right one", especially in the sixth question. In a "test field", because the proposition person often makes new changes here, the answer must be strictly in accordance with the instructions of the prompts, and must not be answered according to the previous set.

For example, the 25th question of an examination is “following the following description of 'reading history' or 'reading the sea', and writing another paragraph with 'reading'. The test instruction is "or", which is to imitate either of the two. Some candidates mistakenly believe that the two must be imitated, and think about the logical connection between "reading history" and "reading the sea", trying hard to lose points.

Second, their own characteristics are not understood,

Students often mention many of their shortcomings in the summary after the exam, such as carelessness, panic, forgetting, slow movements, short-circuit thinking, etc. In fact, these problems should be more appropriate before the exam to find out the corresponding countermeasures, according to their own personality characteristics, strengths and weaknesses to avoid large mistakes in the exam.

For example, students who are usually careless can write a large “fine” word on the draft paper to remind themselves at the beginning of each exam. If you are prone to panic, you can try to make a composition first, so that your mental energy can be released in writing. Because the essay only needs to see the problem, it is unlikely that the big answer will lead to a big mistake. Maybe it may be tensioned. The thinking is active and super-level, and I write a masterpiece that surprises me. After I finish the essay, I feel relaxed and stable. It is much better to bring more than half of the joy of success to other topics. If you encounter a short circuit of thinking, you should quickly transfer to other topics, you must not spend time there, maybe, after a while, the short-circuited place will be connected, and suddenly it is clear! As for the people who usually move slowly, must First set the general answer time for each major question, remind yourself with the electronic watch, or you can deliberately dial the watch for 5 minutes.

In short, to understand their own characteristics, in order to avoid short-term and long-term, but to make progress and avoid weaknesses. Then, by developing a good test answering habit, gradually change your "short" into "long", so that high scores and success are not the only ones?

Third, the allocation time is not appropriate, writing scribbled

The language test paper completes 150 points in 150 minutes, which is basically a question of 1 minute in 1 minute. The basic principle of time allocation is: moderately tight, leaving a little space. The multiple-choice questions should be believed in their first feelings and strive to be completed in 35-40 minutes. In addition to the subjective questions outside the writing, it takes 40-45 minutes, especially for the appreciation questions and language application questions, but also for the full time, but also It can't be dragged for a long time; the composition is usually 45-50 minutes, of which the question must be no less than 5-10 minutes. If you think about it, you can write it again. You can't write half of it and find the problem, and then you will reinvent it. You really think about it. 40 minutes is enough to write an 800-word article.

In this way, the first volume can be vacated for 5-10 minutes, and the composition time can be vacated for 10-15 minutes. Therefore, after the completion of the entire test paper, there is a final inspection time of 15-25 minutes.

Paying attention to this, you can avoid the problem of writing sloppy and hidden points in a hurry, and you will not vacate too much time and do nothing.

Fourth, the answering program is not familiar, lazy draft

Many students believe that the language test is different from mathematics and physics and does not need to be calculated, so it is not necessary to draft drafts. In fact, many language questions must be drafted because it requires accuracy and sophistication. Although most of the short-answer questions have now canceled the word limit, we should still draft drafts when doing appreciation questions, classical Chinese translation questions, modern text reading short-answer questions, copy-writing questions, and segment compression problems. Some students think that this is a waste of time, does not work, but after answering a paragraph of text, I found that I have filled the answer blank, I have not said the idea, so I added and added, and the volume is very Not beautiful. In this case, why not write it on the draft first, and then make a beautiful and concise answer in one language!

More worthy of discussion is the composition. The examination time is tight, the composition can not completely draft the draft and then re-copy it, but it should also draw the "blueprint" first, and then "build according to the map." This will not lead to a "three-sided project." Of course, the draft of the composition can be eclectic. Some people like to play the belly draft: the sleeves are in front, the books are in the back; some people like to outline: from the beginning to the end, the details are slightly positive and negative, and on the paper, there is no big mistake. Here, we recommend the "proposed outline" approach. After all, the thinking of most people is "I don't know clearly, but it is only clear when I write it down." In any case, the one who didn’t make a draft and wrote more than half of it and found out that “the title is thousands of miles” is the most stupid!

Fifth, the acceptance test paper is not serious, rush to answer

Five minutes before the test, after the students get the test paper, they should first accept the test paper: subject, number of sheets, number of pages, number of questions, whether there are any abnormalities such as missing, damaged, and smeared. After confirming the correctness, the next step is started. Often students out of the psychological time, regardless of the ban on the answer at this time, rushed to start answering, and later found that various test papers abnormal, must change the test paper, lost valuable test time, affecting their own mood, not worth the candle. What's more, the hooded answer, the next test, I know that the last page has a question, and I did not pay attention to it, lost points in vain, regret late.

The correct way is to act according to the rules. After writing the items in the sealed line, stop the pen and look at the test paper to understand its general outline: the number of questions, the type of questions, the distribution, and the key questions such as the composition, first read it in time, let it "ferment" in the mind; then, I roughly divided my own sequence of responses, and I was well aware of the coping strategies for the whole test. If students can persist in this long-term, step by step, it can also play a role in relieving the tension of the exam.

Sixth, the answer specification does not follow, answer is not asked

Some candidates answered the questions, because of the myriad of hearts, like the big net. Especially in the appreciation of the topic, always "the center is clear, the language is beautiful, the first and last echo" and so on, the brain is spread on the paper, and hopes to "touch" a little bit. There are still some people who are afraid of missing points. They always think that the more they answer, the better.

As everyone knows, the reviewing teachers mostly dislike this practice; not to mention, more words will be lost, sometimes the words in the answer are written more, but the correct points are overwhelmed, denied, and can not be scored.

Therefore, in our usual training, we must pay attention to mastering the answering norms: First, we must learn to standardize the answering words. If we answer the ancient poetry appreciation questions, we must understand the types of ancient poems by subject matter, the types of expression techniques, and different language styles. The second is to grasp the principle of "what to answer and what to answer", and strive to be ignorant, concise and correct, such as asking "what role in the structure of the article", it can only be from the preparation, transition, care, ups and downs, deepening, etc. Answers from the angle, without having to answer the meaning of the center, content, etc.