The problems that high school candidates should pay attention to in the 100-day sprint stage

The problems that high school candidates should pay attention to in the 100-day sprint stage

As time goes by, it is getting closer and closer to the college entrance examination, and the study of senior high school students is getting more and more tense. However, in the actual teaching, I found that some students have many problems in the review. Some of these problems are methodological, some are customary, and some are ideological. If these problems are not solved well, it will definitely affect the quality of the college entrance examination review, and it is very likely that these questions will be brought to the college entrance examination. The following are the problems I found in teaching practice:

1. In the third year of high school, the college entrance examination was continuous. In normal times, a lot of exercise training was carried out, but some students often did not pay enough attention to their mistakes. They lacked careful analysis and reflection, only pay attention to the answer and not pay attention to thinking. The process only focuses on the amount of questions, not on the quality of the questions. Some students reviewed in the emotional process. Once they have verified the answer, they find that they have a high correct rate. They forget that they have solved the problem in this respect. In fact, there are still many processes to be perfected between the points and the face. .

2. Most of the students spent most of their time on the questions and check the answers in the past, while the understanding and mastery of some basic concepts and principles still remain in the state of “likelihood”. Therefore, when examining conceptual issues, some students often have high error rates. In particular, if the selection questions are wrong, it is estimated that the chances of realizing the dream are getting farther and farther away from themselves.

3. Some students have lame subjects. My two class students, the situation of a class is relatively better, the scores of students in all subjects are basically comprehensive, there is no lameness phenomenon, and the situation of another class is relatively related to this problem. Some students still have shortcomings in a certain subject. The first-time students are in a better situation.

4, knowledge is scattered, some students in the review, review the previous to forget the latter knowledge, do not pay attention to the connection and comprehensive use of knowledge points, although some students can master some knowledge points, but the knowledge is still isolated It's hard to use when it's scattered and problem-solving. Therefore, some candidates can't make a difference in their usual review. Every time they go to the exam, they feel that their minds are blank, and reviewing them for a long time has no effect.

5, some students always compare themselves with others, and secretly compete with others. This is a common phenomenon, including some students who have achieved good grades in normal times. They are always incapable of being more accustomed to others than themselves. If they analyze their own problems through their own, they must know how to know themselves and others, and put some wishes and plans into action. On, scientific review, this is a good thing. In fact, this is often not the case. Some students only see the scores of others. Once others exceed themselves, they feel particularly unconvinced. The temper of "Zhou Yu style" comes out.

I have been saying in class that although the college entrance examination is a highly competitive exam, we must remember that we ourselves are ourselves, we cannot replace others, and we cannot do others. The best way is to constantly improve ourselves. The summary, constant induction, and "self-made". In the review of the pursuit of relative perfection, the pursuit of relative perfection in the exam, then return your score is relatively perfect.

6, the time allocation is unreasonable, the examination is not strict, the language is not accurate.