Sea wolf wild call

"Sea Wolf" and "The Call of the Wild" are from the same person Jack London. The truth of the two articles is the same. They are all about "big stick policy." In the first call of Wildness, it is people who take great sticks to play dogs. I think the "big stick policy" here is a success. For dogs, there is no way to counterattack, thus awakening the wildness hidden in their hearts. So what about Sea Wolf? It’s also a big stick policy, but it’s a failure. People use big stick policies to deal with people? This is not going to work. People are dignified and thoughtful. It is still necessary to mention the main content of "Sea Wolf", not to write. "I" was killed when I was on the boat, and was rescued by a "Ghost". The captain, Wolf Larsen, left the "I" with a whim. On the boat, "I" felt a barbaric little society and couldn't stand it. Finally, I fled the place with a lady. The captain, the sea wolf Larsen, also studied, but he was self-taught. And "I" happens to be an intellectual, and the sea wolf often talks to "I". The view of life by the sea wolf Larsen really shocked me. The sea wolf's point of view is this: the value of life is zero, it is very precious to itself, and for others it is zero. Although it does not agree, it seems to be correct. The life of a child is invaluable to his mother, but not everyone is his mother. Moreover, this view is very correct on this boat. More than once, the sea wolf allowed his subordinates to do the task of challenging the limit. The other people on the boat did not sympathize with him. The face was curious and looked forward to seeing it. The sea wolf's thought was mature! Let's compare the two books. In The Call of the Wild, Buck is a wise dog. He went there and used his wisdom to become a leader. "I" in "Sea Wolf" also became the chief of the sea wolf from the kitchen raft with his own literary knowledge. Is this suggesting that our wisdom is above everything else? Smart people can always succeed, even in the most savage places. Another point. Both novels tell the story of civilization to barbarism. In order to survive, Buck gave up the original elegance and kindness, and he was murderous. In "Sea Wolf", "I" also gave up the original gentleman's attitude and also savagely savage. Suppose, what happens if Buck and "I" are all in their original character? The answer is obvious: dead. Here, it also caused a problem. In life, there is barbarism, and is morality a threshold for survival? Is morality a vanity?

Sea wolf wild call

recommended article

popular articles