2019 college students' thought report essay

Dear Party Organization:

Under the teacher's explanation, my understanding of China's reform and opening up has suddenly become clear, and eating recognizes the rational spirit and scientific attitude in reform and opening up. We xx pointed out: "We must adhere to the correct direction of reform and opening up, and strive to build an institutional mechanism that is full of vitality, efficiency, openness, and conducive to scientific development." Special emphasis is placed on promoting the coordination of all aspects of modernization and all aspects. This is the scientific judgment of the Chinese Communists on the key tasks and key tasks that they must face in continuing to adhere to reform and opening up at the new historical starting point.

We must thoroughly understand the profound meaning of the speech of the General Secretary, and in accordance with the requirements of deepening reform, improving reform, and promoting reform, consciously correct some irregularities, unscientific, and inappropriate practices that have emerged in the reforms, and correct and correct the mistakes. The unscientific science is up and the norms are standardized. In the final analysis, reform and opening up is the transformation of the system. In the past 30 years, we have also carried out many institutional reforms and institutional innovations, and have achieved considerable results. However, institutional reform and institutional innovation are a systematic project. It is necessary to coordinate and support all aspects, and organic coordination of all links. However, due to the limitations of the development stage, many of our past institutional reforms have often been carried out by individual soldiers. What system is better to change and what is not easy to change. There are many uncoordinated and unsupportive situations between various institutional reforms. This situation not only makes the benefits of institutional innovation not well reflected, but also brings some negative problems. At the new historical starting point, our system must not only be reformed, but also must be reformed in a comprehensive and systematic manner. Therefore, it is necessary to "combine the transformation of economic fundamentals and promote the reform of the superstructure, continuously promote the reform of the political system, and provide institutional guarantees and legal guarantees for reform, opening up, and socialist modernization."

This rational spirit and scientific attitude have been reflected in the evolution of the understanding of the relationship between efficiency and fairness in Chinese society. In his speech, the general secretary pointed out: "To achieve social fairness and justice is the inherent requirement of socialism with Chinese characteristics. Dealing with the relationship between efficiency and fairness is a major issue of socialism with Chinese characteristics. Stressing efficiency can add vitality, and focusing on fairness can promote harmony and persistence. The combination of efficiency and fairness can better reflect the essence of socialism. This shows that contemporary Chinese Communists have reached a new height in their understanding of the relationship between efficiency and fairness. The development of contemporary Chinese society cannot be separated from efficiency in the past. It is inseparable from efficiency and inseparable from efficiency in the future. We are still in the primary stage of socialism, that is, the stage of "unqualified socialism" that Deng said. The reason for this is that the level of development of our social productive forces is not high, the economic foundation of the society is not solid, and the material wealth of the people is not sufficient. We must build a well-off society in an all-round way and build a higher-level well-off society that benefits more than one billion people. We must vigorously emancipate and develop productivity and improve efficiency.

In this context, we have made political choices that are more socially fair. More emphasis on social equity is not a question of the pursuit of efficiency itself, but rather an unfair outcome that has emerged under the slogan of “efficiency first” over the years. We must not only reform the "big cake", but also reform the "cut the cake to justice", and strive to make workers, farmers, intellectuals and other people enjoy the fruits of economic and social development. Only in this way can the reform truly win the support of the people and the reform can really continue.

Sincerely

salute!