The college entrance examination volunteers fill in, how to fill it will not waste

Ten years of cold windows, and the night of the night, in order to win the ideal university with excellent results. Therefore, under the limited performance conditions, the college entrance examination students advocate that they should not waste their college entrance examination scores, and the best possible university. But what is a good university? Is 985 a good university? The 211 project is a good university? A college must be better than two, and two must be better than three. The undergraduate must be better than the specialist? Evaluation, first of all to solve a problem of evaluation criteria. 985, 211, one, two, three, specialties, etc. are only the standards of the education administration department. If this standard is applicable to individual students, it needs to be investigated in depth. In fact, the individual evaluation of the school is also standard, but few people have manifested it and expressed it. In the author's opinion, the standard of students' evaluation of the school should be whether it is conducive to the development of the individual. In particular, is the environment for studying is conducive to the success of the students? After graduation, they get a career suitable for their own development? Yes, on A good university is to have a good future, and this is reflected in the right career. So I think this should be a good college standard for most people.

In the past, we have been classifying schools according to the order of prestigious universities, key universities, one, two, three, undergraduate, and specialist, and they have indeed received corresponding returns. For example, graduates from key universities generally develop better than ordinary universities, and the quality of undergraduate employment is significantly higher than that of junior college students. But since the end of the last century, it is true that since 1998, this situation has become chaotic. The quality of employment of graduates of many key universities is not higher than that of ordinary universities. The quality of employment of undergraduates is not necessarily higher than that of specialists or higher vocational colleges. school. Moreover, as time goes by, this situation becomes more and more vague, and there is even a tendency to subvert the original order. As a result, the employment rate of junior college students is higher than that of undergraduates and undergraduates. This kind of reality has made many college entrance examination students and current university graduates unexpected, so that they feel that this is the case. Why should we pursue the so-called famous brand, key point, one book, undergraduate course? Then, as a latecomer, What lessons should the college entrance examination students remember today?

I think, we should first look for the essence behind things through the phenomenon. From the perspective of employment, why is the focus not necessarily better than ordinary? Why is it sometimes not as good as two? Why is the undergraduate course sometimes better than the specialist? Why is it normal? The rule now does not work? This is because in the past, in the economic conditions of the project, the students are fully responsible for the employment of the students. The government must assign the college graduates according to their own standards. The key universities are generally divided into the central or The key departments of local governments, ordinary universities can only be assigned to general jobs, post-graduate posts will be lower, of course, the treatment will be different according to the level of the position. This is the internal basis of the past rules. But now the situation has undergone fundamental changes. Since 1998, the government has no longer been responsible for the graduation assignment of college students, but the students choose their own jobs in the talent market! The market demand for talents certainly follows the market rules, which is the maximization of talent cost performance. That is, talents must create greater value for employers, and the cost of talents must be the lowest. This inevitably puts more realistic and specific requirements on the professional and professional qualities of college students. If there is only one paper diploma, but there is no corresponding professional and professional quality, then it will naturally be eliminated by the market. Under this circumstance, which school's concept is updated quickly and the students' professional quality is higher, their employment rate is naturally higher, and the student's personal development is better. It is no longer the past one, and the undergraduate wins the specialist. It is.

Therefore, for the current college entrance examination students, we must learn lessons, repeat the same mistakes, ensure smooth employment after graduation, and remain invincible in the future market competition. Of course, we must abide by the competition rules of the talent market and make ourselves a price-performance ratio. Maximize talent and compete with your own strengths. If you change Mr. Kai-Fu Lee's words, you will be the best self at the lowest cost! And this ability advantage, the best self is not innate, it needs to transform the potential into a realistic advantage through some professional learning. So what is important to learn is that in addition to maximizing professional quality, the cost of talent is also the lowest, so how to learn? Where to learn becomes more and more important. The process of solving problems, how to learn, and where to study is the academic planning. The so-called academic planning refers to the planning and arrangement of the related academics in order to improve the efficiency of the career development of scholars. Specifically, it refers to the determination of the life of the scholars after completing the cultural enlightenment stage, that is, at the source of determining their career development direction, through in-depth analysis and correct understanding of the scholars' own characteristics and future social needs. The staged career goals, and then determine the academic route, and then the process of formulating the academic development plan in combination with the actual situation of the scholar. In other words, it is to solve the problems of what scholars learn, how to learn, when to learn, where to learn, etc., to ensure that through the study and growth to meet the requirements of the staged career goals of qualified personnel, thereby maximizing the career development of scholars Efficiency and achieve personal sustainability. It can be seen that academic planning should be the guiding ideology of our decision-making for college entrance examination. Under its guidance, we should first consider what kind of majors to learn according to their own characteristics and the needs of the future market, and then consider which schools are in this profession. Have the advantage of running a school, and finally determine the specific school according to their college entrance examination results.

Now, we will have a deeper understanding of the basic guiding principle of "do not waste the scores and fill in the volunteers". The so-called not to waste the score, that is, to choose the most suitable major with your own score, choose the most important schooling advantage in the designated profession. And the school most likely to be admitted. Instead of simply judging the merits and demerits of the school according to the admission batch, it is considered that one wins two books, two wins three books, and the undergraduate wins the specialist.