News professional internship diary

If speed is the life of news, then shorthand is undoubtedly the vitamin of healthy life. If you want me to prove it, I can only come up with two arguments: 1. Good memory is not as bad as a bad one. 2. The details determine success or failure.

I found that after the interview, the information left in the brain will be reduced sharply. The longer the time, the less you can remember. If you can't quickly take notes on the spot, the consequences will be very serious. In addition, I can't rely on recording. This is the feeling after I compiled the recording for the first time. If the manuscript relies on the recording, my first end will be a word that will not be played. It will take a long time to say it. The comment is "How does this become a noun explanation?" Still have to rely on the notes on the spot. I remember that once the newspaper did a live webcast, I had to work to record the half-hour conversation between the reporter and the guests. At first, I think this is very simple, no more simple than interviewing. I am quite dissatisfied that the reporters listened to me while taking notes before the live broadcast: Are there any recordings that still need to use notes? As a result, I was wrong and I was wrong. At that time, it took me more than 4 hours to sort out the half-hour recording, and it was based on the need to make changes to the conversation. Really do not need to modify? of course not! Talking is not the same as writing an article. Can you always write those words into it? Moreover, these guests are the first to go live on the camera, one is to be careful, and the other is ambiguous, involving some professional terminology and fast, if you do not consider these expected troubles and quickly take notes down. By recording, you have to eat it. Later, a classmate introduced his method, that is, listened to it again, and then based on this general understanding and combined with his own transcripts to organize the manuscript.

The second point, I think is also more important, the details. News must be told by facts, and only a little bit determines the importance of the details. For my rookie, if you don't rely on the pen to write down as much detail as possible, you will only be stretched when finishing the manuscript. What's more, you can't make a fact, how can you call it news? I can't believe my memory. The best way is to use notes on the spot. A lot of newspaper reporters have been working for more than ten years. In the interview, they will not lose their pens and papers, let alone an entry-level rookie. In fact, many times, the interview has a general understanding of the incident, and even the draft has been laid, but when it comes to finishing, it still has to rely on the details of the black and white. Even if the memory is good, you have to check it with the transcript. This can't be used to make a joke.

However, in shorthand, experienced reporters are really a bit high. Shorthand, not only speaks of speed, but also pays attention to quality. Often a small interview, I will write down a dense five-page paper, look at the reporter's book that is smaller than mine, but I am jokingly writing down a page, and I also want the teacher's blackboard on the teacher's blackboard. The same is true. On the other hand, afterwards, not only do many words don’t even know each other, but they are also chaotic and unconcerned. The newspaper reporters immediately formed a well-organized draft after the interview, which may be closely related to their shorthand skills.