Countdown to the exam for 21 days: What is the best strategy for preparing for the exam?

Countdown to the exam for 21 days: What is the best strategy for preparing for the exam?

It happened to be a big problem like this:

In a certain period of time, the mathematics test was good, and the English test was poor. For this reason, he decided to vigorously heal. As a result, the mathematics of the final exam grew by 10 points, but the English scored 10 points. His total score is still M, from which he can judge his performance: A, rises; B, maintains balance; C, falls.

The answer to this question is C.

I have seen many students like this. Almost every student has his own lame subjects, and the students' ideas are the same: try to learn the lame subjects.

This idea is of course good, but some students are not doing the right thing. For example, some girls think that their English scores are good. They do not learn English while attending English classes and learn their own lame subjects mathematics. After class, they are still numeracy mathematics...

However, after a while they found out that mathematics has basically not improved, and the original English is also poorly tested!

From this we can draw the conclusion that this method of dismantling the East Wall to make up the Western Wall is not advisable. The treatment should be used in the usual study, but it is not a good learning strategy at the last moment of the joint exam preparation. In the past, some students did not listen to the teacher's advice, and they went their own way and eventually failed.

"Frozen three feet is not a cold day", the final period of the joint entrance examination, it is even more impossible to fill up your own lame subjects at a glance, the correct approach should be: to foster strengths and avoid weaknesses, try to play. In other words, try to play out your own dominant disciplines, try to take a good shot of your own lame discipline, and then use your own superior discipline to make up for the shortcomings.

Students must have had such experience: every time they rank top, it is the result of strengths and weaknesses. If a test "long" is not raised, it must not be tested.

Therefore, students do not have to work hard to make up for their own mistakes - their poor subjects are originally not good at themselves, often do not like but forced themselves to study hard, so learning is both laborious and miserable. From the results point of view, it is better to play the advantage of the subjects that they are good at.

Of course, our strengths and weaknesses do not mean that we should completely abandon short subjects. For the short-term department, we should focus on the basic knowledge learning, and make the basic things clear first. The goal is the 80& middle and low-level questions in the test paper. Time can be focused, but not too much to seize the learning time of dominant subjects. Learning is like this. Even if you are a long subject, if you don’t study for a while, you will be unfamiliar and will fall.

Demolition of the east wall to fill the western wall, the wall is not uniform. It is better to avoid the shortness of the disease.

[Users who have read this article also read the following excellent articles, you can also check it out! 】

[The third round of review strategy for the joint entrance examination] [Practical and effective four-step preparation strategy]