The 31st written to the third year of high school students: to score the "standardization of homework and training"

The 31st written to the third year of high school students: to score the "standardization of homework and training"

classmates:
We have proposed a slogan that is "20 points to standardization." In fact, if we can achieve a real change from non-standard to normative, we will have more gains, and there will be a larger area of ​​improvement, and more students will achieve a substantive breakthrough in the second round of review!
Do you have the following irregularities in the homework and training?
1, the words are scribbled, the text is not standardized, the writing is not serious;
2, the format is not standardized, the steps are not clear, and the process is incomplete;
3. The correction is not timely, and the reflection is not in place;
4, the completion is not independent, the operation has plagiarism;
5, the answer is not clear.
With the smear of the answer sheet alone, we have the following repeated discrepancies:
1, uneven application is not standard
2, the use of pencil is not standard
3, leaking coating, appearing blank
4, the exam number is wrong, the subject category is missing, please carefully calculate, how many mistakes that should not occur, how much loss will be brought to us?
As far as the various subjects are concerned, the increasing scores of the liberal arts writing standardization are more obvious. The discussion and short answer questions, especially the composition, if the writing is not neat, you will face a very dangerous situation: although you are not a calligrapher, as long as you are willing You can write the words clearly and work neatly. The joint exam paper is not the place where you practice cursive writing. If you practice cursive, you can go to the calligraphy class to learn in the future. In order to ensure this, you'd better write with a pen, because the current inferior atomic pen is very light and illegible. You have to touch a scoring teacher with poor eyesight. He will complain that you intend to go with him. Do you think your score can be high?
With good norms, the problem-solving process is both concise and clear, in order to improve the agility and accuracy of problem solving, reduce the loss of negligence, and fully reflect the level of knowledge and ability. Regarding the standard answer, some senior scoring teachers gave the following pertinent suggestions:
1, the marking is generally given in steps, to give a certain score in a certain step. The expression of the problem-solving process is too simplistic. Some of them only have no answer and no analysis, so even if the answer is completely correct, the corresponding steps will be deducted. Write the equations corresponding to each process, as long as the description and expression are correct, you can get the corresponding scores; some students like to write a comprehensive, or even equation, and the scoring principle is "comprehensive error finding", that is, as long as they are found There is a mistake in the synthesis, and all processes cannot be integrated. Therefore, for questions that cannot be solved, the step-by-step method can also get the corresponding process points and increase the chance of points.
Writing should be neat, especially involving mathematics and letters. For example, the letter "b" and the mathematics "6", there are students who lost points because they did not write clearly.
2, the examination should be careful, the keyword eyes must not be negligent when reviewing the questions must be careful, especially pay attention to some important keyword eyes, do not think that it is "easy title" "Chen title" will be taken at a glance, pay attention to "Chen" There may be "new ideas." Don't just look at it as a "new question, a difficult problem" and give up on it. It's hard to know that the "difficult problem" is only a little bit. The "new question" is only new. It is a great pity to neglect to read the wrong question or to give up easily. This is also an important part of standardized training. I hope that students should pay attention to strengthening training.
3, the answer to the standard, the points have skills from the evaluation of these years, many students because the answer is not standardized, there is no corresponding test skills, resulting in the loss of a lot of deserved points, some students are quite serious points, one Kodak has more than 20 points, and some of them are better students. To avoid this, pay special attention to the following situations:
A. Concise text description combined with equations Some candidates solve the problem from the beginning to the end. There is no equation. There is no necessary text description. The symbols used in the equation indicate what is not proposed; some candidates have the opposite, the text expression is too long, like writing The key equations are not listed. Both the time and the space of the answer sheet are lost, and the above two situations will lead to discrepancies. Therefore, in the answer sheet, simple text expression is advocated, and the key points are combined with the illustration and the physical equation.
B, try to use common methods, use universal symbols

Some candidates do not start with the conventional method when they solve the problem. Instead, they use some special and strange methods for the sake of simplicity. Although it is correct, the marking teacher is not easy to see for a short time. Similarly, using some symbols that are not customary to express the physical quantities of some features, the scoring teacher may also be wrong. This is because the workload of the teacher at the marking site is very heavy, and the average number of papers per day is more than 2,500. The average time to read a question is only a few seconds.
C. For complex numerical calculation problems, the final result must first solve the symbolic expression and then substitute the numerical value for calculation. The expression of the final result occupies a certain score. As a result, the correct calculation process of the expression is wrong, and only a few points are lost. If there is no calculation error in the result expression, the chance of losing points is very large.
It is also important to remind everyone that due to the need to scan online, the candidates are required to have a moderately clear text size. Arrange the layout of the answer reasonably, and do not integrate points because you are beyond the box. In the comprehensive section, each question is given a limited space, and the candidate's answer should be valid within the scope of the given prescription. Don't answer the wrong position. The first question can only be placed in the space given by the first question.
4. Because it is a computer scoring, the scoring teacher averages more than 1,000 papers per person per day. Some students wrote it on the test paper and felt that it was wrong and changed it. It was wiped gently with an eraser, and it was not cleaned. It also affected the clarity. If it was heavy, the paper would be easy to break or hair, and the words could not be seen clearly. Some students simply crossed out, but the space on the test paper was limited, and the rest of the words were very crowded. The teacher still couldn't see clearly, and it was easy to cause misjudgment. Therefore, candidates should pay attention to, stabilize the mood, and then think clearly, the language organization is good and then write down.
5, writing standards, the correct terminology.
Because the examination room is tense, there are students who are quick, write scribbles, and write a pen on the pen to let the teacher guess the words, waste the teacher's time, affect the speed of the scoring, and easily lead to ambiguity, leading to misjudgment. Therefore, when answering the question, the words should be written as standard as possible, and no calligraphy is required, but the requirements should be as clear as possible. The chemistry department should pay special attention to both the text answer, the symbol writing, the chemical symbol, the molecular formula, the structural formula, the structural simplified form, and the name. What is required, corresponding to answer, the connection between atoms in the organic structure is correct, do not write misplacement.
Classmates, in our reading column, everyone sees how many people will change their position by one point and two points. Isn't this a change in fate? The details determine success or failure, and the details will determine your future destiny. I hope that everyone will do a good job of standardizing the answer in the intense review!
Let us work together to make the "Operational Specification Week" vigorous and effective!