Scientific development is big or bad

Regarding the debate on whether scientific development is good or bad, I agree that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

It is impossible for human life without technology. From the primitive people, they did not eat, hungry bark, drinking human blood. Since a long period of time, humans have finally invented rice, wheat, barley and other foods, and people's days have gradually improved.

It is sad that a person does not progress. A country that does not progress is declining: a world that does not progress is dark. For thousands of years, from the carriage to the car, train, and aircraft: from the kerosene lamp to the incandescent lamp, neon lights, energy-saving lamps: from the end of the earth into a close-knit, video chat, mouse know everything.

Everything has its two sides, the favorable side, and the side that has its drawbacks. We cannot be sure of the opposite side. For example, air pollution, experts have already introduced prevention plans; white garbage, unified treatment; car exhaust caused by warmer temperatures, scientists have also developed solar cars.

The developed countries of the world have proposed new development models for low-level economy, such as: solar air conditioners, solar cells...

Highly developed science and technology will surely solve the shortcomings brought about by all scientific developments; it will surely bring mankind into a better life; it will surely transform the world into perfection. Therefore, I believe that the advantages of scientific development outweigh the disadvantages.

Sixth grade: a nonsense life