Just want to be the protagonist's supporting role can only be a harlequin

I met a consulting client a few days ago. She has worked in English for more than five years. She has worked in administrative, foreign trade, sales, personnel, etc., and each job is full of enthusiasm, because these are friends. Recommended promising or developmental positions, but after personal experience, I found that each post has some people feel unsatisfactory, which made her fall into deep confusion. So she simply resigned at home and gave herself plenty of time to think about what she was going to do. During the leisure time at home, although I also learned a lot of positions through various channels, I finally chose to give up because of various objective reasons. After a few months, she stopped at the origin.

In her detailed talks, she clearly felt that she had high expectations for herself, and she hoped to be the protagonist of the people, not the supporting roles that seemed to be mixed. Throughout the experience of several positions, she feels that these jobs are supporting roles, no technical content and development prospects, but the core positions that I want to do are lost because of their professional mismatch, lack of self-confidence or poor development prospects. . Seeing that many of my peers have already achieved something, and that they are like the dust floating in the air, on the one hand, there is no ability to drift into the distance, I hope someone can help, and on the other hand, there is no courage to fall to the ground, because the feeling It was a very faceless thing, so it floated every day. She hates the current lifestyle, but she doesn't know how to figure it out. Although I have had the idea of ​​starting a business, I don’t know where to start, and I’m not sure if I can stick to it... Objectively speaking, she is currently biased in the understanding of the protagonist of the workplace and does not have the role of becoming the protagonist of the workplace. Ability and tolerance.

We often say that the workplace is actually like a big stage. Everyone in the workplace is an actor on this big stage. Everyone will be given a role when they enter the workplace. Due to the influence of each person's family background, education, professional and personal qualities, different people will have the role of “Guojiao” and “supporting role” in the early stage of the workplace. difference. Some people have more accumulated in the early stage, and they are better in all aspects, so they are the protagonist or the protagonist at the beginning, such as entering a good unit, having an enviable job or holding a high salary; and some people are themselves Preparation is not very full, and the ability of all aspects is not very prominent, so at first it can only be a supporting role, the work is very ordinary, the salary is only enough to eat and drink.

Is it really bad when the supporting role in the workplace? For newcomers in the workplace, when you first enter the workplace, you must be mentally prepared to do the supporting role, at least 2 years or even longer. This is not only a modest attitude, a cooperative attitude, but also a realm. You must know that no one can take the lead in the first place, and only the talented person who can play the role can lower his head to do things, and only after doing things well can he produce results, and only if he has achieved results, he can be ordinary. The ups and downs of the post. If your current ability determines that you can only be in the supporting role, and you are not willing to be a supporting role, it may be like the customer above, the protagonist is not successful, the supporting role does not want to be, and every day is still immersed in the protagonist's dream In the middle, it becomes a poor "spiritual protagonist, a supporting role of reality", and success can only become an unreachable dream. While objectively accepting differences in the ability and quality of the protagonist, we should find ways to make up for our own deficiencies, rather than blaming ourselves.

If at work, you only position yourself as a supporting role, an ordinary employee, then you will be guilty of "big things are confused, small things are true": just to finish your own work, you are satisfied, free I only want to go online or look at gossip news, don't care about extra things, don't take the initiative to take on more responsibilities, when the company needs people to come forward, you must be involuntarily bowing your head, lest others See yourself. And in some small things, it will be especially true. For example, if the company lets you work overtime for free, you will be reluctant to act. It seems that the boss is exploiting his capitalist. Every time he gets paid, he becomes very sensitive. If the company is late. For a child's day, I think you will spend a lot of time complaining about the company's inhumanity and various deficiencies in these days, and then seek some spiritual satisfaction in the attachment of others.

In fact, when you position yourself as a manager, you always think of more than ordinary employees, and consider always more detailed than ordinary employees. When you do anything, you will think at a certain height, not Just look at immediate interests and ignore long-term interests. When the role is positioned correctly and the behavior is accurate, your income will naturally be very different, because your role will make a qualitative change in your behavior, and your ability will change qualitatively. What comes up is the change in the quality of income.

You should never complain that you are just a supporting role in the workplace. The phrase "market demand determines the existence of value" tells us that your role is determined by market demand. Your superiors or bosses are a measure of your ability. Good ruler. Don't say how bad the boss or the boss is. Sometimes, when you are poor, you look down on anyone and can't understand the realm of others. If you are still in the workplace, then there is still a long way to go from the protagonist of the workplace, not only professional skills, but more importantly, mentality and realm. At the same time, don't take "there are always thousands of horses, and Bole does not often have" as your own unchanging mantra, and the sentence is out now. The protagonist and the supporting role are also relative, and the employees who do their job well in each position should be the "protagonists." For employees, each person will have different job responsibilities due to differences in abilities and hobbies. This difference is an objective and subjective result. As long as you like your position and do your job well, you should be the "protagonist."

Are you the protagonist of the workplace, or the supporting role? This answer is not important, because there is no forever protagonist, there is no long-lasting supporting role, you are the director of your own workplace, your stage is yours!