Talking about the guarantee (review)
That day, my composition class was very bad. After I approved the students, let them write a letter of guarantee and read it out.
To be honest, the students worked hard. However, more than half of the students' review books are “unqualified” products.
The "unqualified" of these products is mainly manifested in the following aspects: First, there is no time; Second, there is no reason for writing a review; Third, there is no confession; Fourth, there is no punishment for not fulfilling the guarantee, and so on.
Why are so many students writing unqualified products? The reason may be that the narrative six elements are not strong in consciousness, and the review book is still in the narrative category. It is still necessary to confess the necessary time, place, person, reason, process, result, and guarantee content, and the punishment measures for not issuing the guarantee content, and then I think that I should focus on writing two points. It may not be as important to write a review book as I value writing. I think that the review book is a piece of cake, so I didn’t think about it and wrote it. I may have criticized it in a bad mood. Play the essay level; maybe it’s really not written or read the review book, and so on!
However, I think that the most important reason for not writing is that on the one hand, the narrative six elements are not strong, and on the other hand, the thinking is not in place. These students did not seriously think before writing, when and where, what happened, who participated, and what the result was, because it was a written guarantee, and I also wrote that I promised to do that. And if I can't fulfill the guarantee, what kind of punishment will be given, and so on. If these contents are written before, the thoughts are divergent, multi-angle, and think about all aspects, I think that even if you have not written or heard people read the test, you can write well. At least not too badly written. Therefore, the most important thing in learning composition is to improve the ability to adapt. You should not only memorize the rules and techniques of death, but should learn to do the same thing and think about it.
Life is complicated, and exams don't necessarily guarantee that you don't get the style you learn. Therefore, when we study essays, we must learn to write a literary ability. If you encounter any genre, you should not be afraid of it first. Second, you must seriously think about it. The third is to think about it in a divergent way. Think about what aspects of the article are involved, what are the causes and effects of the matter, and what is involved in it. From the superficial phenomenon to the essence of things, from the macroscopic situation to the microscopic grasp, from the lateral thinking to the vertical consideration, it is necessary to think about it as comprehensively as possible and from all angles. Before writing an article, try to dilute the stylistic awareness. I personally think that the most important thing is to distinguish the style from the article, in order to facilitate people to find certain rules from the article, to write faster and better. In other words, there should be an article content first, followed by a stylistic classification. Forms serve the content. When a real painter makes a painting, there is no such thing as a frame in his mind; when a real martial artist masters a trick, he does not want to use any kind of trick. They are all based on the specific situation, random and convenient, flexible and free to deal with specific situations. It is natural and natural. This is probably the highest state of all art!
It’s a bad thing for students to make trouble, and it’s not glamorous for me to make a big leap. But I calm down and think about why such problems arise, and the crux of the problem, how to avoid such problems. It’s a good thing for me to be a student.
It is true that the words of the blessings are in vain, and the blessings are the blessings. It seems that anything that happens can be a good thing as long as it is not met by melons.
I thought about the above cloud by writing a review book. I don’t know what the cloud is like? !
Wednesday, April 6th, 2005
To be honest, the students worked hard. However, more than half of the students' review books are “unqualified” products.
The "unqualified" of these products is mainly manifested in the following aspects: First, there is no time; Second, there is no reason for writing a review; Third, there is no confession; Fourth, there is no punishment for not fulfilling the guarantee, and so on.
Why are so many students writing unqualified products? The reason may be that the narrative six elements are not strong in consciousness, and the review book is still in the narrative category. It is still necessary to confess the necessary time, place, person, reason, process, result, and guarantee content, and the punishment measures for not issuing the guarantee content, and then I think that I should focus on writing two points. It may not be as important to write a review book as I value writing. I think that the review book is a piece of cake, so I didn’t think about it and wrote it. I may have criticized it in a bad mood. Play the essay level; maybe it’s really not written or read the review book, and so on!
However, I think that the most important reason for not writing is that on the one hand, the narrative six elements are not strong, and on the other hand, the thinking is not in place. These students did not seriously think before writing, when and where, what happened, who participated, and what the result was, because it was a written guarantee, and I also wrote that I promised to do that. And if I can't fulfill the guarantee, what kind of punishment will be given, and so on. If these contents are written before, the thoughts are divergent, multi-angle, and think about all aspects, I think that even if you have not written or heard people read the test, you can write well. At least not too badly written. Therefore, the most important thing in learning composition is to improve the ability to adapt. You should not only memorize the rules and techniques of death, but should learn to do the same thing and think about it.
Life is complicated, and exams don't necessarily guarantee that you don't get the style you learn. Therefore, when we study essays, we must learn to write a literary ability. If you encounter any genre, you should not be afraid of it first. Second, you must seriously think about it. The third is to think about it in a divergent way. Think about what aspects of the article are involved, what are the causes and effects of the matter, and what is involved in it. From the superficial phenomenon to the essence of things, from the macroscopic situation to the microscopic grasp, from the lateral thinking to the vertical consideration, it is necessary to think about it as comprehensively as possible and from all angles. Before writing an article, try to dilute the stylistic awareness. I personally think that the most important thing is to distinguish the style from the article, in order to facilitate people to find certain rules from the article, to write faster and better. In other words, there should be an article content first, followed by a stylistic classification. Forms serve the content. When a real painter makes a painting, there is no such thing as a frame in his mind; when a real martial artist masters a trick, he does not want to use any kind of trick. They are all based on the specific situation, random and convenient, flexible and free to deal with specific situations. It is natural and natural. This is probably the highest state of all art!
It’s a bad thing for students to make trouble, and it’s not glamorous for me to make a big leap. But I calm down and think about why such problems arise, and the crux of the problem, how to avoid such problems. It’s a good thing for me to be a student.
It is true that the words of the blessings are in vain, and the blessings are the blessings. It seems that anything that happens can be a good thing as long as it is not met by melons.
I thought about the above cloud by writing a review book. I don’t know what the cloud is like? !
Wednesday, April 6th, 2005
recommended article
- Review book for the teacher
- Violation of Disciplinary Review
- True and sincere review
- Homework did not bring a review book
- A review of the essays suddenly absent in the political class
- Conference opening review
- Review book for playing cards at school
- Did not attend the student council regular meeting review book
- Rescue training does not follow the command of the review
- University escape class review book
- Hospital work dereliction of duty review
- a teacher's review book
popular articles
- Injured sentence
- 2014 is very touching words
- Review book on fights
- The latest high school inspirational maxim
- Party member self-criticism check
- University syllabus review book essay
- Classical life motto
- Korean swear words
- Deaf people jingle 2019
- I want to say something to the teacher.
- Work violation review essay
- University exam cheating review book
- Really regretted the review
- Student review book essay
- English famous words
- Review of work dereliction of duty and negligence of work
- Bing Xin’s famous words
- Teacher's famous saying
- Du Yuexi's famous sayings
- Describe the fast time sentence 2019
- Universal Review Book 6
- Strong words
- College entrance examination inspirational quotes
- Qq space mood phrase
- Tao Xingzhi's famous sayings
- Thanks to the friend's words 2019
- a good saying that loves labor
- Universal review book 500 words, 1000 words
- Taizai’s famous sayings
- Sad love sentence 2019