I am a woman and a lawyer.

The judge, the gentlemen of the jury:

You are all very clear that I am standing in front of you, not because of my own choice. In order to comply with a traditional system, I stood here at the request of the court and tried my best to defend the desperate. Can the local prosecutor actually make me a target of his unhappiness, is it strange that I am questioning me because I am a woman?

The lawyer told you that I am a woman. I want to know, when he announced this amazing discovery, whether the planets are no longer waiting for their rails to be tired, and the rivers are no longer running to the ocean. I was shocked that the judge was not fainting on the bench after listening to the shocking discovery, and the jury of your jury, who is actually a terrible for your nervous system. The blow came over.

I am a terrible thing that everyone calls a woman----however, my client, he is just a poor, helpless, undefended man. And he hopes to get your sympathy and give him a judgment he wants in this case. I am very sympathetic to the unpleasant situation of the prosecutor. Indeed, the world is open to him. He is like all men - he can be eager to be promoted to the highest office, holding the torch to lead the political campaign, and on the day of the election, sell his voting rights for $1.50. However, he is still not satisfied with this. Just as Alexander the Great wants to conquer more land, he wants to get your judgment, and, in order to awaken your sympathy, he tells you that I am a woman and he is just a man.

I admit, I do not clearly understand what his relationship with this case is. His logic is that I am a woman, so you should decide that the defendant is guilty. This conclusion came very suddenly. We hurriedly crossed the disputed river, but did not build any bridges or ferries, nor did we have any places to waddle. In his long series of logical inferences, there seems to be an lack of an important link, and somewhere is indeed flawed. of course. Mothers are always weak after experiencing such unusual production. Therefore, we infer that we should be generous, as the poet said: "Ignore his mistakes and praise his virtues."

However, the prosecutor insisted that I am a woman. The gentlemen of the jury, I pleaded guilty to this cruel crime that I am a woman. I have brought 5 healthy children to the world. Because of my hard work, I have raised these children. Among them, some have now stepped into the life stage of a broader man and woman from boys and girls. However, I hate to use the phrase "she is a woman" to covert and insinuate. The purpose of this statement is to belittle me in front of you and devalue my efforts in this cause. This statement is boring because it is covered in a flattery coat of dense candy.

In the name of the mothers and girls who have nurtured you, in the name of the wives and girls who have injected love into your eyes, I hate this practice of judging that the jury is biased and secretly asking for help. I hate this kind of bad heart and insinuation. They believe that a woman who appears in a lawsuit tarnishes her own, and her gender will not be unreasonable to her. I hate it, because your gentlemen are closed and silent, which shows that you are narrow-minded enough to bring prejudice to the jury, and you may also make insulting inferences, violate the oath, and then The defendant punished.

The local prosecutor’s speech is disrespectful to the group that vows to make decisions based on law and evidence; it is also disgraceful for the profession that he should add to his glory. If he wants to turn your attention away from the truth of the case, then let me say this: Compared to his serious vow, this is a disgusting practice; and, relative to his professional responsibility This is also not appropriate. However, perhaps, this female lawyer has caused him into trouble. I believe that the fact of being a female lawyer is far more difficult to deal with than the fact that I am a woman. The prosecutor hydrogen licked his lips and hinted that I was called a "female lawyer." But unfortunately, I can't respect him for a compliment, yes, I can't. Because I have never heard anyone who uses any lawyer title to call him.

Ok, let's all the problems of hydrogen come down to it. I am a woman, I am also a lawyer---then what? This is not a novelty or an incredible thing. I work as a lawyer in this city. I have several offices in a building in this city. I am calm and sober and go to my offices every day. For judges and lawyers in California, I am certainly no stranger. And, gentlemen, I am in my profession with the permission of California law. My work is just and honest. I didn't do this under the promise of other states that didn't require any knowledge. I have been recognized by the public. I won't be scared away, and I won't be tired. I don't ask for extra privileges, and I don't expect any bias. However, I only ask that one thing should be fair, that is, those who have a better chance than me, those who have fewer obstacles than me need to cross, who have less trouble than me need to argue, should Discussing the truth of the law with me on an equal footing, and should not always and constantly refer to that gender issue - in essence, raising this question is purely a matter of course, it does not meet professional norms. It also lacks masculinity.

I am awake to not do this kind of argument. Just as I have tolerated their accusations countless times in the past. However, the days of blaming it for this have passed. Their views -- an effective weapon for me and for other women who enter the legal world -- will ultimately harm their cause and will harm the interests of their clients. This view must be eliminated, and I hope that this view can be eliminated - it will eventually be eliminated.