Power Engineering Equipment Tendering Procedures and Tender File Model Part III (Bid Evaluation Method)
Part III evaluation method
1 general provisions
1.0.l The bid evaluation must follow the principles of fairness, justice, science and rigor.
1.0.2 The bid evaluation shall be conducted in accordance with the contents specified in the bidding file. Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of the present Measures stipulate the contents and methods that should be considered in the evaluation of bids.
1.0.3 The bid evaluation object of this method refers to the valid bidding documents required by the bidder to request the bidding documents, including the formal written clarification file of the original bidding file submitted by the bidder and the bidding agency.
2 Organization and Responsibilities 2.0.1 The tendering agency will set up a bid evaluation team. The bid evaluation team for the bidding of the main engine and the main auxiliary equipment is confirmed by the project bidding leading group and accepts its leadership.
2.0.2 The project bidding leading group shall designate the tenderee and the bidding agency to be responsible for the organization of the scale.
2.0.3 The bid evaluation team is generally composed of the project legal person, the tendering agency, the engineering design unit and the experts hired. The total number of participants is more than 5 singular, of which the employed experts are generally not less than 2/3. The evaluation team can be divided according to the situation. Business group and technology group. Each group has a group leader of l or 2 people, responsible for the convening and evaluation of the evaluation comments.
2.0.4 The employed experts should have senior professional titles in principle and have a high level of professional skills. Technical experts should be familiar with the domestic and international technical level and development status of the equipment in this profession; economic experts should be familiar with relevant laws and regulations and have practical business work experience. The employed experts are hired by the bidding agency and the tenderer from the library of power equipment evaluation experts. Personnel who have a stake in the bidder may not enter the bid evaluation team.
2.0.5 The tenderee may, according to the actual situation, equip the bid evaluation team with the necessary professionals, and under the guidance of the experts of the evaluation team, complete the summary and compilation of the relevant materials of the bidding documents.
2.0.6 The technical group and the business group shall work relatively independently, but the technical team is obliged to provide the business group with the information necessary for the evaluation of the bid, and the business group is also obliged to check the bidder's technical scope with the technical team.
3 evaluation program
3.1 The bid evaluation work should be carried out after the bid evaluation. Generally, the following procedures are used:
3.1.1 Reading the bids and organizing the materials
3.1.ll The sub-groups of the bid evaluation team read the materials separately, and listed the main technical data, performance and business terms comparison table and deviation table.
3.1.1.2 Specially mark and record the requirements and unclear requirements of the bidding files in the bidding files, and sort out the problems that need to be clarified by the bidders.
3.1.2 Clarification
3.1.2.1 Depending on the circumstances, the bid evaluation team may require the bidder to carry out the necessary clarifications. The clarification is generally carried out in the form of a clarification meeting, and other forms may be used for clarification upon approval.
3.1.2.2 After clarification, a valid written file shall be used as an effective supplementary material for the tender file.
3.1.2.3 Clarification shall not make substantive changes to the original bid file.
3.1.3 Preliminary evaluation 3.1.3.1 If the bidder's qualifications are not pre-examined, the bidders must first be qualified to exclude unqualified manufacturers.
3.1.3.2 The bid evaluation team will review the bidding files to check whether the bidding files have made a substantial response to the bidding files, and whether the bidding files and the bidding files have substantial deviations to determine whether they are valid bidding files. Bidders who have substantial differences in the main technical and commercial terms of the bidding file and the bidding file and/or deviate from or the price exceeds the scope of the bidding value shall be excluded. However, there should be no fewer than two bidders entering the detailed evaluation stage. When bidders' bid prices exceed 5% of the target value, they shall be treated according to the scrap and re-tendered.
3.1.4 Detailed evaluation
The detailed evaluation of the bidding files is carried out in two lines, namely, technical detailed evaluation and business detailed evaluation.
3.1.5 Comprehensive evaluation
3.1.6 Prepare a bid evaluation report
3.1.7 calibration
3.2 For the public bidding of some large and complex equipment, the technical part of the first bidding file and the business part without the quotation can be used. After the clarification of the bidding file, the bidder quotes and reopens the price mark. Then follow the above procedure to evaluate the bid.
4 technical evaluation
4.1 Evaluation factors
The content of the evaluation should be determined according to the characteristics of the equipment. Generally, capacity/capacity, economic performance, scope of supply, reliability, main parameters and important performance bidding, life, structure/configuration characteristics, operating characteristics, maintenance conditions, service, manufacturing quality and supply performance are numerous.
4.2 Technical Rating
4.2.1 If the evaluation factor cannot be calculated reasonably, the method of scoring is generally adopted. Equipment reliability is generally considered in the past three years. For the reliability evaluation, please refer to the relevant data quality evaluation issued by the Ministry of Power Reliability Center. And information released by the relevant departments of the Ministry of Electric Power/National Electric Power Company.
4.2.2 According to the technical bidding situation of each bidder, select its main content as the bid evaluation factor. The selection of the evaluation factors should be based on actual results, but not too much.
4.2.3 According to the importance of each factor, the weight of each factor is reasonably determined. The technical score is based on the percentage system.
4.2.4 The specific evaluation factor shall be proposed by the bidding agency. The bid evaluation team may make appropriate adjustments to the actual situation of the root sawing project and shall be confirmed by the tenderee. This work shall generally be completed before the bid opening.
4.2.5 The final score of the technical evaluation is taken as the average of all the scores of the participating scores.
4.3 Economic calculation
4.3.1 All evaluation factors that can be reasonably calculated shall be calculated into the amount according to their guaranteed value. The guarantee value proposed by the bidder shall be proved by the measured data of the same type of equipment, otherwise the bid evaluation expert shall analyze the credibility of the guaranteed value.
4.3.2 Calculate the amount of increase or decrease in the bid price due to the difference in capacity according to the determined value of unit capacity/capacity.
4.3.3 Economic performance
4.3.3.1 Calculate the increase or decrease of the bid price according to the difference between the heat consumption of the turbine, the efficiency of the boiler and the efficiency of other equipment.
4.3.3.2 According to the difference in power consumption, according to the 'cost method' or the “coal consumption method plus compensation machine”, the share of the increase or decrease of the bid price is converted.
4.3.4 Confirm the bidder's detailed scope of supply and the import department kit and submit it to the business group.
4.3.5 When using the methods specified in 6.1.3.2 and 6.1.3.3 for comprehensive evaluation, the difference in equipment technical scores of each bidder calculated according to the method of paragraph 52 can be reasonably converted into the amount. The amount of each score determined by the bid evaluation team based on the total price of the bid and the technical complexity.
5 business evaluation
5.0.1 The bidder shall quote the currency specified in the bidding file of the school. If the quotation currency does not conform to the requirements of the bidding file, the quotation for the different currencies provided by each bidder shall be converted into the quotation of the currency specified in the bidding file according to the exchange rate announced by the state on the day before the bid opening. The exchange rate risk is borne by the bidder.
5.0.2 The financing, payment method and payment terms of each bidder shall be converted to the same benchmark according to the present value method.
5.0.3 Calculate the transportation, warehousing, tax and insurance costs of each bidder based on the equipment arriving at the installation site.
5.0.4 Adjust the scope of supply of each bidder to the same benchmark. The equipment price of the increased or decreased scope of supply shall be adjusted according to the highest quotation of the corresponding project of the other bidders in this bidding or the latest identical or similar equipment contract price or valuation.
5.0.5 The design, technical service and personnel training costs of each bidder shall be converted to the same standard.
5.0.6 Adjust the delivery year to the same benchmark based on the price increase index reported by each bidder.
5.0.7 Calculate other business expenses to be evaluated according to the requirements of the bidding file.
5.0.8 Calculate the business evaluation based on the quotation.
6 comprehensive evaluation
6.1 comprehensive sorting
6.1.1 According to the evaluation results of the business group and the technical group, the bidders designated by the organization responsible for the evaluation of the bidding and the team members of the bidding agency organization technical group and the head of the business group jointly conduct the comprehensive evaluation, and propose the pre-bidder order and listen. Project bidding leading group.
6.1.2 The tendency of pure technology or pure economy should be avoided when conducting comprehensive evaluation.
6.1.3 Comprehensive sequencing principle
6.1.3.1 The evaluation price is low and the technical evaluation is the highest. When the evaluation price is the same and the technical score is different, the technical score is higher. When the evaluation price is different and the technical score is the same, the lower evaluation price is preferred.
6.1.3.2 When the bid evaluation price is high and the technical score is also high or the bid evaluation price is low and the technical score is also low, the ranking can be as follows:
When the technical scores are similar and the bid evaluation price is different, the lower bid evaluation price is preferred;
When the technical score is relatively large and the bid evaluation price is similar, the technical score is higher;
The price “similar” and the “similar” scores are determined by the bid evaluation team and submitted to the project bidding leading group, which can generally be controlled within the range of 1%-2% of the evaluation price and technical score.
6.1.3.3 The technical score and the bid evaluation price can also be converted into the same form for comprehensive sorting when conditions are met.
6.1.3.4 When the technical scores are similar and the prices are similar, the bid evaluation team will submit the evaluation opinions and report to the project bidding leading group for decision.
6.1.3.5 The qualifications of the recommended pre-winners shall be reviewed and confirmed, and the results of the review and confirmation shall be included in the evaluation report.
7 Preparation of bid evaluation report
7.0.1 The evaluation level is responsible for the preparation of the bid evaluation report, including the bid evaluation process, the composition and signature of the bid evaluation personnel, the main technical performance data, the sub-item quotation and the evaluation price list, the technical score sheet, the main technical features and recommendations. Yibei and information review.
8 calibration
8.0.1 The project bidding leading group shall be subject to the approval or approval of the provisions of the Electricity Industry Department [1997] No. 23.
9. Confidentiality principle
9.0.1 Personnel participating in the bid evaluation shall strictly abide by the state's laws, regulations and regulations on confidentiality, strictly abide by self-discipline, and accept the audit and supervision of the higher authorities and relevant departments.
9.0.2 Within the specified time and scope, the bid evaluation and the evaluation results are confidential and no one may disclose it.
9.0.3 The members of the bid evaluation team do not represent their respective units and have no right or obligation to report the evaluation of the bids to their respective units.
9.0.4 Prior to the comprehensive bid evaluation, the business group and the technical team should not exchange information on price and technical scores.
9.0.5 During the bid evaluation period, no one is allowed to bring the bidding documents and their summary materials out of the designated location of the bid evaluation. The materials should be kept and distributed by the special person, and the user will be returned after the completion of the bid evaluation.
9.0.6 In case of violation of the above provisions, the responsibility of the relevant personnel shall be investigated.
1 general provisions
1.0.l The bid evaluation must follow the principles of fairness, justice, science and rigor.
1.0.2 The bid evaluation shall be conducted in accordance with the contents specified in the bidding file. Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of the present Measures stipulate the contents and methods that should be considered in the evaluation of bids.
1.0.3 The bid evaluation object of this method refers to the valid bidding documents required by the bidder to request the bidding documents, including the formal written clarification file of the original bidding file submitted by the bidder and the bidding agency.
2 Organization and Responsibilities 2.0.1 The tendering agency will set up a bid evaluation team. The bid evaluation team for the bidding of the main engine and the main auxiliary equipment is confirmed by the project bidding leading group and accepts its leadership.
2.0.2 The project bidding leading group shall designate the tenderee and the bidding agency to be responsible for the organization of the scale.
2.0.3 The bid evaluation team is generally composed of the project legal person, the tendering agency, the engineering design unit and the experts hired. The total number of participants is more than 5 singular, of which the employed experts are generally not less than 2/3. The evaluation team can be divided according to the situation. Business group and technology group. Each group has a group leader of l or 2 people, responsible for the convening and evaluation of the evaluation comments.
2.0.4 The employed experts should have senior professional titles in principle and have a high level of professional skills. Technical experts should be familiar with the domestic and international technical level and development status of the equipment in this profession; economic experts should be familiar with relevant laws and regulations and have practical business work experience. The employed experts are hired by the bidding agency and the tenderer from the library of power equipment evaluation experts. Personnel who have a stake in the bidder may not enter the bid evaluation team.
2.0.5 The tenderee may, according to the actual situation, equip the bid evaluation team with the necessary professionals, and under the guidance of the experts of the evaluation team, complete the summary and compilation of the relevant materials of the bidding documents.
2.0.6 The technical group and the business group shall work relatively independently, but the technical team is obliged to provide the business group with the information necessary for the evaluation of the bid, and the business group is also obliged to check the bidder's technical scope with the technical team.
3 evaluation program
3.1 The bid evaluation work should be carried out after the bid evaluation. Generally, the following procedures are used:
3.1.1 Reading the bids and organizing the materials
3.1.ll The sub-groups of the bid evaluation team read the materials separately, and listed the main technical data, performance and business terms comparison table and deviation table.
3.1.1.2 Specially mark and record the requirements and unclear requirements of the bidding files in the bidding files, and sort out the problems that need to be clarified by the bidders.
3.1.2 Clarification
3.1.2.1 Depending on the circumstances, the bid evaluation team may require the bidder to carry out the necessary clarifications. The clarification is generally carried out in the form of a clarification meeting, and other forms may be used for clarification upon approval.
3.1.2.2 After clarification, a valid written file shall be used as an effective supplementary material for the tender file.
3.1.2.3 Clarification shall not make substantive changes to the original bid file.
3.1.3 Preliminary evaluation 3.1.3.1 If the bidder's qualifications are not pre-examined, the bidders must first be qualified to exclude unqualified manufacturers.
3.1.3.2 The bid evaluation team will review the bidding files to check whether the bidding files have made a substantial response to the bidding files, and whether the bidding files and the bidding files have substantial deviations to determine whether they are valid bidding files. Bidders who have substantial differences in the main technical and commercial terms of the bidding file and the bidding file and/or deviate from or the price exceeds the scope of the bidding value shall be excluded. However, there should be no fewer than two bidders entering the detailed evaluation stage. When bidders' bid prices exceed 5% of the target value, they shall be treated according to the scrap and re-tendered.
3.1.4 Detailed evaluation
The detailed evaluation of the bidding files is carried out in two lines, namely, technical detailed evaluation and business detailed evaluation.
3.1.5 Comprehensive evaluation
3.1.6 Prepare a bid evaluation report
3.1.7 calibration
3.2 For the public bidding of some large and complex equipment, the technical part of the first bidding file and the business part without the quotation can be used. After the clarification of the bidding file, the bidder quotes and reopens the price mark. Then follow the above procedure to evaluate the bid.
4 technical evaluation
4.1 Evaluation factors
The content of the evaluation should be determined according to the characteristics of the equipment. Generally, capacity/capacity, economic performance, scope of supply, reliability, main parameters and important performance bidding, life, structure/configuration characteristics, operating characteristics, maintenance conditions, service, manufacturing quality and supply performance are numerous.
4.2 Technical Rating
4.2.1 If the evaluation factor cannot be calculated reasonably, the method of scoring is generally adopted. Equipment reliability is generally considered in the past three years. For the reliability evaluation, please refer to the relevant data quality evaluation issued by the Ministry of Power Reliability Center. And information released by the relevant departments of the Ministry of Electric Power/National Electric Power Company.
4.2.2 According to the technical bidding situation of each bidder, select its main content as the bid evaluation factor. The selection of the evaluation factors should be based on actual results, but not too much.
4.2.3 According to the importance of each factor, the weight of each factor is reasonably determined. The technical score is based on the percentage system.
4.2.4 The specific evaluation factor shall be proposed by the bidding agency. The bid evaluation team may make appropriate adjustments to the actual situation of the root sawing project and shall be confirmed by the tenderee. This work shall generally be completed before the bid opening.
4.2.5 The final score of the technical evaluation is taken as the average of all the scores of the participating scores.
4.3 Economic calculation
4.3.1 All evaluation factors that can be reasonably calculated shall be calculated into the amount according to their guaranteed value. The guarantee value proposed by the bidder shall be proved by the measured data of the same type of equipment, otherwise the bid evaluation expert shall analyze the credibility of the guaranteed value.
4.3.2 Calculate the amount of increase or decrease in the bid price due to the difference in capacity according to the determined value of unit capacity/capacity.
4.3.3 Economic performance
4.3.3.1 Calculate the increase or decrease of the bid price according to the difference between the heat consumption of the turbine, the efficiency of the boiler and the efficiency of other equipment.
4.3.3.2 According to the difference in power consumption, according to the 'cost method' or the “coal consumption method plus compensation machine”, the share of the increase or decrease of the bid price is converted.
4.3.4 Confirm the bidder's detailed scope of supply and the import department kit and submit it to the business group.
4.3.5 When using the methods specified in 6.1.3.2 and 6.1.3.3 for comprehensive evaluation, the difference in equipment technical scores of each bidder calculated according to the method of paragraph 52 can be reasonably converted into the amount. The amount of each score determined by the bid evaluation team based on the total price of the bid and the technical complexity.
5 business evaluation
5.0.1 The bidder shall quote the currency specified in the bidding file of the school. If the quotation currency does not conform to the requirements of the bidding file, the quotation for the different currencies provided by each bidder shall be converted into the quotation of the currency specified in the bidding file according to the exchange rate announced by the state on the day before the bid opening. The exchange rate risk is borne by the bidder.
5.0.2 The financing, payment method and payment terms of each bidder shall be converted to the same benchmark according to the present value method.
5.0.3 Calculate the transportation, warehousing, tax and insurance costs of each bidder based on the equipment arriving at the installation site.
5.0.4 Adjust the scope of supply of each bidder to the same benchmark. The equipment price of the increased or decreased scope of supply shall be adjusted according to the highest quotation of the corresponding project of the other bidders in this bidding or the latest identical or similar equipment contract price or valuation.
5.0.5 The design, technical service and personnel training costs of each bidder shall be converted to the same standard.
5.0.6 Adjust the delivery year to the same benchmark based on the price increase index reported by each bidder.
5.0.7 Calculate other business expenses to be evaluated according to the requirements of the bidding file.
5.0.8 Calculate the business evaluation based on the quotation.
6 comprehensive evaluation
6.1 comprehensive sorting
6.1.1 According to the evaluation results of the business group and the technical group, the bidders designated by the organization responsible for the evaluation of the bidding and the team members of the bidding agency organization technical group and the head of the business group jointly conduct the comprehensive evaluation, and propose the pre-bidder order and listen. Project bidding leading group.
6.1.2 The tendency of pure technology or pure economy should be avoided when conducting comprehensive evaluation.
6.1.3 Comprehensive sequencing principle
6.1.3.1 The evaluation price is low and the technical evaluation is the highest. When the evaluation price is the same and the technical score is different, the technical score is higher. When the evaluation price is different and the technical score is the same, the lower evaluation price is preferred.
6.1.3.2 When the bid evaluation price is high and the technical score is also high or the bid evaluation price is low and the technical score is also low, the ranking can be as follows:
When the technical scores are similar and the bid evaluation price is different, the lower bid evaluation price is preferred;
When the technical score is relatively large and the bid evaluation price is similar, the technical score is higher;
The price “similar” and the “similar” scores are determined by the bid evaluation team and submitted to the project bidding leading group, which can generally be controlled within the range of 1%-2% of the evaluation price and technical score.
6.1.3.3 The technical score and the bid evaluation price can also be converted into the same form for comprehensive sorting when conditions are met.
6.1.3.4 When the technical scores are similar and the prices are similar, the bid evaluation team will submit the evaluation opinions and report to the project bidding leading group for decision.
6.1.3.5 The qualifications of the recommended pre-winners shall be reviewed and confirmed, and the results of the review and confirmation shall be included in the evaluation report.
7 Preparation of bid evaluation report
7.0.1 The evaluation level is responsible for the preparation of the bid evaluation report, including the bid evaluation process, the composition and signature of the bid evaluation personnel, the main technical performance data, the sub-item quotation and the evaluation price list, the technical score sheet, the main technical features and recommendations. Yibei and information review.
8 calibration
8.0.1 The project bidding leading group shall be subject to the approval or approval of the provisions of the Electricity Industry Department [1997] No. 23.
9. Confidentiality principle
9.0.1 Personnel participating in the bid evaluation shall strictly abide by the state's laws, regulations and regulations on confidentiality, strictly abide by self-discipline, and accept the audit and supervision of the higher authorities and relevant departments.
9.0.2 Within the specified time and scope, the bid evaluation and the evaluation results are confidential and no one may disclose it.
9.0.3 The members of the bid evaluation team do not represent their respective units and have no right or obligation to report the evaluation of the bids to their respective units.
9.0.4 Prior to the comprehensive bid evaluation, the business group and the technical team should not exchange information on price and technical scores.
9.0.5 During the bid evaluation period, no one is allowed to bring the bidding documents and their summary materials out of the designated location of the bid evaluation. The materials should be kept and distributed by the special person, and the user will be returned after the completion of the bid evaluation.
9.0.6 In case of violation of the above provisions, the responsibility of the relevant personnel shall be investigated.
recommended article
- Engineering construction bidding contract (performance bank
- Construction project bidding agency contract
- Project construction bidding contract (subsidiary file)
- Bid entrustment guarantee contract (trial)
- International civil engineering bidding
- Characteristic class cooperation agreement
- Power engineering equipment tendering procedures and tendering files
- Project construction bidding contract conditions (1st
- International civil engineering bidding (bid)
- Contract model: tender for construction and installation projects
- Construction and installation project bidding
- General conditions for construction supervision contract of highway engineering
popular articles
- Strong words
- Qq space mood phrase
- English famous words
- Teacher's famous saying
- Sad love sentence 2019
- Project construction bidding contract (bid)
- Engineering construction bidding contract (prequalification
- Bing Xin’s famous words
- Characteristic class cooperation agreement
- 2014 is very touching words
- Tao Xingzhi's famous sayings
- a good saying that loves labor
- College entrance examination inspirational quotes
- Taizai’s famous sayings
- Injured sentence
- Tender specification
- Thanks to the friend's words 2019
- Vegetable/fruit tender contract template
- Tendering agreement
- Lease management bidding procedures and rules
- Deaf people jingle 2019
- Describe the fast time sentence 2019
- Tender specification
- Classical life motto
- Korean swear words
- I want to say something to the teacher.
- The latest high school inspirational maxim
- Medical institution drug centralized bidding negotiation contract
- International Cargo Bidding Purchasing Contract
- Du Yuexi's famous sayings