Secretarial knowledge > Secretary basis

Evaluation of graduation thesis


To evaluate graduation thesis, it is necessary to adhere to the standard of scoring, study the writing of reviews, and make accurate judgments, fair evaluations, and norms.
First, the standard of graduation paper review results According to the relevant regulations, the results of graduation papers can generally be divided into excellent, good, passing, failing four files. The specific standards for graduation thesis of the Central Party School Correspondence School are now reproduced below for reference.
excellent
1. It can correctly reflect the relevant policies and policies of the party and the state, and can comprehensively apply the theory of learning and the relevant knowledge of the profession.
2. Can closely contact the actual work of the system, the department, and the unit. The analysis of the problem is correct and comprehensive, with certain depth or originality, and has certain guiding significance for practical work.
3. The center is outstanding, the arguments are sufficient, the structure is rigorous, the level is clear, and the expression ability is strong.
4. Rich in materials, reliable in data, and able to use scientific methods for processing.
good
1. It can correctly reflect the relevant policies of the party and the state, and can better apply the knowledge related to the theory and profession.
2. It can better link the actual work, analyze the problem more correctly and comprehensively, and have a certain reference role in guiding the actual work.
3. The center is clear, the arguments are sufficient, the levels are clearer, the sentences are smooth, and the expressions are better.
4. The materials are abundant, the data is basically reliable, and the processing can be well finished.
Pass
1. I can correctly understand the relevant policies and policies of the party and the state. There is no principled error in theory, and I can basically grasp and apply the relevant knowledge that I have learned in this major.
2. Still able to contact the actual work, basically can express their own views, have a certain ability to analyze problems and solve problems. However, the analysis of the problem is superficial, or only the phenomenon can be listed, and the center is not prominent enough.
3. There are certain arguments, the main data is basically reliable, and the sentences are still fluent.
4. There is a certain amount of raw materials, and a certain degree of processing is carried out.
If you fail to meet one of the following terms, you should be rated as failing.
1. Violating the relevant policies and policies of the party and the state, or theoretically making mistakes in principle, it is very poor to master the relevant professional knowledge.
2. The article has no center and the level is unclear. The logic is confusing and the sentence is unreasonable.
3. The material is incomplete or the main data is distorted, and the processing is poor.
4. The main content basically plagiarizes the results of others.
Any paper that is copied from others' results or written by others will be disqualified for review and defense once it is found to be verified.
The above review criteria must be strictly controlled, and the standards should not be lowered, and the scores should be increased. Second, it should be adapted to local conditions, but at the same time, the same batch of students should be “one bowl of water flat”, and different standards should not be adopted for different people.
Second, the writing of the comments of the graduation thesis has two kinds of comments: one is to guide the opinions of the instructors, and the other is the opinion of the defense committee.
The guidance of the instructor's opinion is to guide the instructor's opinion, mainly to evaluate the whole paper from the perspective of writing. The main points of the evaluation are:
1. Whether the point of view is correct and clear;
2. Whether the argument is sufficient;
3. Whether the analysis is comprehensive;
4. Whether the structure is reasonable;
5. Whether the statement is fluent;
6. There is no practical guiding significance.
The following is a comment on the article "Some Thoughts on Stopping the Charges of Small Charges in China":
This paper can link theory with practice, make a comprehensive analysis of the current performance of China's small unreasonable charging phenomenon and its causes, and put forward the suppression measures, which have certain reference role for practical work. The structure of the article is reasonable, well-organized, the arguments are more adequate, and the statements are fluent.
The answer to the opinion of the defense committee
1. How is the attitude of the defense;
2. Whether the idea is clear;
3. Whether the answer is accurate;
4. Whether the language is smooth;
5. Whether there is any compensation for the lack of original text.
The following is the opinion of the defense committee of the article "Private Enterprise Problems and Countermeasures" of the 86th-level students of the Central Party School Correspondence College. It not only makes an objective evaluation of the defense, but also affirms the topic selection and originality. Make necessary additions to the guidance of the mentor.
This subject is a sensitive issue in the current theoretical circle. The systematic and complete research results are very few. The author's topic is bold and the writing intention is clear.
In the process of defense, the ideas are clear, the logic is strong, and the discussion of some issues is deepened.
The texts of graduation thesis should be concise, the attitude should be objective, the evaluation should be appropriate, and both the ambiguity and the ambiguity must pay attention to the measurement. It should be pointed out that some of the graduation thesis comments are too simple and sloppy, which is not advisable.

recommended article

popular articles