Risk assessment implementation plan
Part 1: Risk Assessment Implementation Plan
To fully implement the scientific development concept, adhere to the people-oriented principle, maximize the fundamental interests of the broad masses of the people, establish and improve scientific decision-making and decision-making mechanisms for major issues in key construction projects, and effectively prevent and reduce the hidden dangers affecting the stability of engineering construction from the source, and maintain In a harmonious and stable social environment, combined with the actual situation of the Bureau, the following implementation plans are formulated.
First, the evaluation content
The social stability risk assessment for major issues referred to in this program refers to whether the decision-making and implementation of major issues in the key project construction area may lead to large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents for early prediction, preliminary judgment, and early intervention. Before making important decisions involving the interests of the people or organizing other major matters, the decision-making unit or organizational unit will take the lead in coordinating the relevant departments involved in major issues, soliciting opinions extensively, conducting research and judgment through investigation and research, and conducting risk assessment. report. According to the risk assessment report, risk resolution will be carried out for major risks, and the occurrence of letters and visits and unstable events will be prevented and reduced from the source to ensure the smooth implementation of major issues.
Second, the evaluation principle
Major issues Social stability risk assessment should adhere to the following principles: people-oriented, scientific decision-making; prevention-oriented, overall planning; who is responsible, who is responsible; who decides and who is responsible.
Third, the scope of assessment
According to the requirements of the due diligence evaluation, social stability risk assessment should be carried out for major issues that are closely related to the vital interests of the general public, involve a wide range of issues, have far-reaching impacts, and are prone to conflicts or disputes that may affect social stability. Major issues include:
Due to the construction of key projects, construction projects that may affect the production and life of units along the line and the people.
It is related to the major reform and restructuring of the staff and workers of the unit, the social security relationship, the treatment of employees and the disposal of major assets.
It is related to the frontline construction personnel, especially the wages of migrant workers, the major issues of maintaining their own rights and interests, and major decisions.
Emergency handling of sudden accidents and rectification of potential safety hazards during the construction of key projects.
Other matters that the party group and the organ think should be carried out for social stability risk assessment.
Fourth, the assessment content
In accordance with the principles of objectivity, accuracy, fairness and effectiveness, we will assess the possible impacts on security and stability.
Whether it complies with national laws and regulations and relevant policies.
Whether it has undergone rigorous and thorough feasibility argumentation and follows the principles of fairness, openness, and impartiality, and has fulfilled procedures such as consultation, publicity, and hearing.
Whether it has a greater impact on the production and life of the people involved, there is a risk of causing large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents.
Whether legal and policy channels can be used to properly resolve reasonable objections and demands from the public.
Whether it can be based on laws and policies to resolve the unreasonable demands that the public may raise, and ultimately gain the understanding and support of the majority of the people.
Whether to conduct pre-existing research and demonstration on the policies, such as compensation, resettlement, and security of the people, to avoid causing similarities in similar areas or similar matters in other regions.
There are other factors that may cause instability.
V. Organizational leadership
The assessment work is managed in a unified manner and is responsible for grading. Set up a working group on social stability risk assessment for major issues of the Bureau. It is also a member of the Bureau of Migrant Workers' Rights and Interests Maintenance Leading Group. It is responsible for coordinating the coordination of the social stability risk assessment of major issues. According to the division of functions, each room is responsible for the evaluation of specific matters, the person in charge of the department is the first person responsible for risk assessment, and the party is the person directly in charge.
Six, the evaluation program
Determine the assessment. All social security risk assessments are required for all matters related to the provisions of Article 4 of this program.
The organization conducts the assessment, and the first responsible person takes the lead in organizing a special evaluation team to be responsible for the specific assessment work. The various departments actively cooperate, extensively investigate and demonstrate, and predict the risk of pre-judgment. Expert consultation, sample survey, field survey, public notice, symposium, hearings, etc. may be adopted to solicit opinions, fully listen to the grassroots opinions and reasonable appeals of representatives of relevant interest groups, and summarize and organize opinions and suggestions. Accurately determine the possible social stability risks and put forward assessment opinions.
Form an assessment report. The evaluation team forms an evaluation report based on comprehensive analysis and argumentation, and realistically makes a risky, risky, risk-free or risk-free evaluation of the assessment, and proposes whether to implement it.
Develop a work plan. The major subject of risk, the assessment subject submits the assessment report together with the risk mitigation and emergency response work plan. For major issues that must be implemented in the case of unstable risks, the unstable risks are promptly submitted to the leading group, the bureau party group or the higher authorities for scheduling and dissolving.
The evaluation report is submitted. After the various departments form an evaluation report, they need to implement a dual filing, and report to the party group of the bureau for the record at the same time as the social stability risk assessment working group of the major matters of the reporting bureau.
Seven, relevant requirements
Pay close attention to the assessment. The main responsible persons of all departments must change their concepts, put the stability risk assessment work into the overall work, plan and implement it, earnestly implement it and achieve results. It is necessary to take the social stability risk assessment as a pre-program and necessary conditions for the introduction or implementation of major issues, so that major issues are not assessed and will not be decided.
Follow the evaluation program. It is necessary to carry out evaluations in strict accordance with the procedures, gradually improve and improve the procedures and standards for risk assessment, continuously carry out exploration and research, summarize and improve, and gradually improve the scientific, rational and operability of the assessment work.
Improve the level of assessment. In the implementation of the assessment, we must extensively solicit opinions from the public on the basis of comprehensive, thoughtful and meticulous principles, comprehensively consider the interests of all parties, do not engage in closed-door assessments, imagine assessments, and go deep into the public to grasp the problem of understanding and typical appeals. Be good at discovering the risks of real potential risks and continuously improve the evaluation level.
Focus on risk resolution. For major matters that can be implemented, which belong to the department at the same level, it is necessary to clarify the main body of responsibility and work requirements for risk mitigation. If it is necessary for the superior to coordinate, it must be reported to the relevant department at a higher level in time.
Strengthen assessment and assessment. It is necessary to take the social stability risk assessment of major events as a basic work to maintain stability, incorporate it into the daily assessment scope of each project site, incorporate the annual work target assessment content and employee performance evaluation of each department, and include the content of the year-end assessment of the leadership team and middle-level cadres.
Implement accountability. In the process of decision-making in major matters, which should be assessed without assessing or organizing the implementation of assessments in the form, prevention and resolving work is not implemented, not in place, causing instability or mass incidents, and seriously affecting social stability, will be in accordance with Hefei The Municipality maintains certain provisions on social stability work to conduct accountability investigations.
Part 2: Risk Assessment Implementation Plan
In order to comprehensively implement the scientific development concept, correctly handle the relationship between reform, development, and stability, handle the relationship between economic development and audit work in our county, and effectively maintain the harmony and stability of the county's overall social situation, and sustain the economy and society of our county. The health development is escorted and the implementation plan is formulated according to the requirements of the county.
I. Guiding ideology and principles
Guided by Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thinking of the "Three Represents", adhere to the scientific concept of development, adhere to the overall idea of maintaining stability and "going forward, shifting the focus, preventing prevention, treating both the symptoms and the root causes", and may appear on major issues. Stabilize risk early prediction, early assessment, and early resolution, and strive to prevent and resolve social contradictions that affect stability from the source to ensure local social stability. The social risk assessment adopts the principle of “local management” and “who is responsible and who is responsible”.
Second, the scope and content
The major matters referred to in this embodiment are my audit projects involving the interests of the overwhelming majority of the people in our county.
The scope of risk assessment.
Major audit projects involving the interests of the people of our city.
Content of risk assessment
1. Does it meet the interests of the majority of the people and whether it has a greater impact on the production and life of the people involved;
2. Whether it will lead to large-scale collective petitions or other mass incidents, and whether the measures and measures for resolving are feasible;
3. In addition to the above-mentioned aspects, the problems encountered in the work that may seriously affect social stability are also subject to risk assessment.
Third, the subject of risk assessment
The main body responsible for social stability risk assessment is the functional department that formulates major issues. Each unit of our bureau evaluates the major audit items involved in the scope of their respective duties.
Fourth, evaluation procedures and steps
Establish an interim assessment organization
According to the requirements of the county, combined with the nature of the work of the bureau, it was decided to set up an interim assessment team. The heads of the various units will form an assessment team and be responsible for formulating the evaluation plan.
Conducting opinion polls
Each stock room should widely publicize the audit to the public, so that the public can fully understand the relevant content of the audit. It should be widely consulted in many ways, in multiple forms and in multiple channels. In particular, it is necessary to pay attention to the opinions and requirements of the people directly involved. It is necessary to collect, summarize and organize the opinions and suggestions of the people in a timely manner, and truly and completely reflect the wishes of the broad masses of the people.
Analytical argumentation
In case of disagreement and major auditing projects that have objections, the hearings shall be organized in time to invite representatives of relevant personnel to participate. The participants will conduct serious and in-depth discussions, consultation and communication, analysis and evaluation, and scientific argumentation. After the meeting, clear arguments will be formed.
Evaluation result processing
The Bureau's Temporary Assessment Team conducts a comprehensive summary and analysis of the work, and makes qualitative treatments that can be implemented, suspended or not implemented in accordance with the social stability risk level. For those who have certain risks, but comply with relevant laws and regulations and urgently need to implement matters, the responsible department should prepare emergency plans for prevention and disposal in advance, and actively resolve the risks of social stability.
Reporting of the evaluation report
The assessment subject must submit the risk assessment report to the bureau's temporary assessment team, and study and discuss the solution and timely report to the county maintenance and stability office.
V. Responsibility investigation
If it is necessary to conduct a social stability risk assessment without organizing an assessment or an organizational assessment, but the resolution and disposal measures are not implemented without reporting to the Office to maintain a stable office, resulting in large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents, the relevant stocks are mainly The responsible person and the person directly responsible shall conduct accountability. Responsibility investigation is recommended by the Bureau's provisional assessment team for accountability, and then the Bureau maintains a stable leadership team.
Part III: Risk Assessment Implementation Plan
In accordance with the spirit of the Notice of the Municipal Party Committee Office and the Municipal Government Office on Printing and Distributing the Implementation Opinions on Promoting Social Stability Risk Assessment in the City, in order to thoroughly implement the scientific development concept, correctly handle the relationship between reform, development, and stability, and promote scientific and democratic decision-making. Level, prevent and reduce unstable factors from the source, promote the scientific and rapid development of the city's human resources and social security, and maintain social harmony and stability.
First, the guiding ideology
Adhere to the scientific development concept as the guide, take people's livelihood as the foundation, and give priority to talents. Improve the administrative and democratic decision-making mechanisms according to law, standardize administrative procedures and behaviors, scientifically assess the social risks of major decisions, major initiatives, and major policies, and fully consider the society. The sustainable ability of all groups and economic and social development, continuously improve the democratic, scientific, rational and operability of various policy decisions, ensure the development of human resources and social security and synchronize economic and social development, and guarantee the improvement of people's livelihood and people's expectations. Require synchronization and focus on building a happy Zhuzhou.
Second, the basic principles
The principle of unity of powers and responsibilities. In accordance with the general principles of “who is in charge, who is responsible”, “who decides, who is responsible”, “who approves, who is responsible”, all departments and units of the bureau are responsible for leading and organizing social stability risk assessment within the scope of their duties.
People-oriented principle. Adhere to the basic principle of putting people first and governing for the people, putting the fundamental interests of the people in the first place, and whether the people's people support and support is the basic standard and scale. In accordance with national laws and regulations and the party's principles and policies, in accordance with the normative procedures, comprehensive and in-depth analysis, scientific assessment and prediction, grasp the combination of the long-term interests of the people and the real interests, accurately judge, and minimize and reduce the hidden dangers and problems.
The principle of democratic decision-making. Adhere to the popular line, enhance the transparency of analysis and evaluation of major issues, and use public participation programs such as argumentation, hearing, and publicity to widely listen to and solicit opinions from all sides, and effectively protect the people's right to know, participate, and supervise. Listen to the expressions of the disadvantaged groups, maximize the consideration of the interests of different groups, and improve the democratic and scientific decision-making.
Third, the subject of risk assessment
Where the social stability risk assessment is to be carried out, the drafting department of the relevant policy, the implementation department of the relevant work, and the lead department determined by the bureau party group when the matters involve multiple departments are responsible for organizing the implementation of the social stability risk assessment. We must do a good job in social stability risk assessment. The organ that has the power to make a decision is the subject of responsibility for evaluating whether a major matter is feasible, and is responsible for making a corresponding decision based on the assessment report. The Office of the Bureau and the Office of Letters and Calls are responsible for the guidance, coordination and review of the social stability risk assessment work, and make recommendations to the party group to supervise the implementation of prevention and mitigation of social stability risks.
4. Key areas of social stability risk assessment work
Major decisions or policy adjustments. Major adjustments in policies including pension, medical care, unemployment, work injury, maternity insurance and minimum wage; major adjustments in active employment policies and entrepreneurial support policies; major adjustments in personnel management systems and wage and welfare systems in government institutions; military retired personnel Resettlement policies, major adjustments to the policy of enterprises' difficult military to cadres, and major adjustments to the social security policies of land-expropriated farmers.
Major work items. Implementation of major laws, regulations and policies of the state and the province, coordinating employment and social security issues in urban and rural development; employment of land-expropriated farmers and implementation of social security policies; assistance for groups with employment difficulties, especially the development and resettlement of public welfare posts Matters; adjustment of social insurance benefits such as pension adjustment for enterprise retirees; changes in social insurance service methods, service programs, service connotations; personnel examinations such as civil servant recruitment; recommendation, review and title evaluation of professional and technical personnel; Resettlement and distribution work; adjustment of incentives and performance evaluation rewards for government and public institutions; maintenance of legal rights and other matters such as wage payment for migrant workers.
It involves the reform and restructuring of the majority of the people. State-owned and collectively-owned enterprises, restructuring and restructuring, and the transfer of personnel and personnel transfer, social resettlement, etc.; relevant reform procedures involved in the reform of government and public institutions, personnel relocation, social security relations, and employee benefits.
V. Main contents of social stability risk assessment work
The assessment of the social stability risk of the matter involved should be evaluated in terms of safety, legality, rationality, feasibility, and whether there are other risks of inducing unstable events.
Assess legality. Mainly assess whether the formulation and promulgation of policy measures are in conformity with national laws, administrative regulations, local regulations and regulations, whether it conforms to the party's line policy and policies; whether major issues are in compliance with legal procedures; whether issues involving the interests of the public are fully implemented in accordance with laws and policies In place.
Assess the rationality. Does the main assessment conform to the requirements of the scientific development concept, whether it takes into account the interests of the overwhelming majority of the people, whether it takes into account the interests of different interest groups in all aspects, whether it takes into account the long-term interests and real interests of the people, and whether it follows fair, just and open in principle.
Evaluate feasibility. It is mainly assessed whether it has undergone democratic decision-making, whether it conforms to the overall level of local economic and social development, whether it conforms to the local financial and public burdens, whether it is in line with the long-term planning of local economic and social development, and whether it has relative stability, continuity and rigor. Wait.
Assess security. It mainly assesses whether there are signs of causing mass incidents, tendencies, whether there are other hidden dangers affecting social stability, whether there are corresponding early warning and emergency response plans, whether they are controllable, and whether there are specific measures to resolve conflicts and solve problems.
6. Procedures and measures for social stability risk assessment
Evaluate the basic program. Before making decisions, introducing policies, and implementing reform measures, we must conduct social stability risk assessment in accordance with the following basic program requirements.
1. Determine the evaluation project. Major issues that need to be organized for social risk assessment are generally determined by the responsible entity and may be determined or recommended by the bureau party group.
2. Develop an evaluation plan. The responsible entity collects relevant files and materials, adopts questionnaires, opinion polls and other means to grasp the basic situation of the assessment objects, reasonably formulate evaluation plans, and organize assessments in a timely manner.
3. Analyze and assess risks. Focusing on the legality, rationality, feasibility, safety and other related issues of the assessment items, we will conduct in-depth and in-depth understanding of the situation, solicit opinions and suggestions from direct interest groups, and conduct comprehensive analysis and research, especially after the implementation of the assessment items. The unstable factors appearing are analyzed and forecasted on a case-by-case basis, and the number, scope, and methods of the people involved in the unstable events may be evaluated and predicted.
4. Determine the risk level. The risk of social stability is divided into three levels: A, B, and C. If the public reacts strongly and may cause major unstable events, the assessment is Grade A; if the public reflects a large degree and may cause general instability, the assessment is Grade B; although some people's opinions differ, they may only lead to individual conflicts. The assessment is C grade. Before the evaluation report is formed, the responsible party shall propose a risk assessment proposal, and report it to the Municipal Stability Office after review by the bureau leader. Based on the investigation and analysis of the situation, the Municipal Stability Office approved the risk level of major decision-making matters and issued written opinions.
5. Form an assessment report. On the basis of sufficient argumentation and evaluation, according to the risk level approved by the Municipal Stability Office, the contractor shall prepare a social stability risk assessment report on the assessment items, risk analysis, assessment conclusions and response measures.
6. The conclusion of the evaluation is adopted. Those who are rated as Class A risk shall not be implemented. For the assessment of the B-level risk, the implementation is suspended. Or the contractor and the stability department will formulate a risk response plan, clarify the responsibilities, and formulate a solution to the contradiction before implementation. For the C-level risk, the contractor shall organize and implement the contradictory prevention and resolving work according to the relevant pre-plans.
Implement measures to maintain stability and responsibility. For matters that have some contradictions and problems but have been evaluated and implemented, the responsible main department must conscientiously implement specific measures to resolve contradictions and maintain social stability: in the case of deferred implementation of the assessment, it is necessary to timely study countermeasures and resolve conflicts. When the time is ripe, implement it again; resolutely terminate the implementation of matters that cannot be understood and supported by the majority of the people; and follow the whole process of tracking and maintaining the major issues that have been evaluated and implemented, and timely discover and resolve the conflicts encountered and The problem is to ensure the smooth progress of major issues; to formulate emergency plans for potential hidden dangers, to do a good job in the work of the people, and to prevent major problems affecting social stability.
Seven, work requirements
Strengthen organizational leadership. The establishment of the Bureau of Social Stability Risk Assessment Leading Group, Director Zhou Guangyao as the team leader, deputy directors Liu Yuxian, Liu Zegui, He Xiangyuan as the deputy leader, other bureau members and the principal responsible for the second division are members. The leading group office is located in the bureau office, and Liu Yuxian serves concurrently. Director of the office, Wang Ruhai is the deputy director, and other bureaus are members of various departments and second-level divisions. All bureaus and units of the bureau should attach great importance to the assessment of social stability risk, and take it as an important basic work to maintain stability. As a major task of coordinating interests and promoting social harmony and stability, it is feasible as a research and decision-making measure. Important reference. As the first responsible person of the undergraduate department and the unit to maintain stability, the principal person in charge should strengthen the organization and leadership of the social stability risk assessment work and timely study and solve the problems encountered in the work. Establish a regular, institutionalized, and standardized work process, and build a solid defense line for social stability from the source.
Strict assessment of accountability. From 20XX onwards, all departments and units must fully implement the social stability risk assessment work and effectively strengthen the implementation of the responsibility of the responsible party. The bureau office, supervision office, and petition office should strengthen work guidance and supervision and inspection, incorporate it into the annual assessment work, directly link with the evaluation of the first evaluation, and strictly implement the one-vote veto system for maintaining stability. In the event of an unstable event, the relevant provisions of the Plant Management Office [20XX] No. 35 shall be conducted to ascertain the implementation of the incident, cause, loss and social stability risk assessment of major decision-making, and the assessment shall not be evaluated or in the assessment. In the case of formalism, if the assessment is inaccurate or the prevention and resolving work is not implemented or in place, causing major unstable events and seriously affecting social stability, it is necessary to seriously investigate the responsibilities of relevant leaders and relevant personnel.
Adhere to overall planning and consideration. All relevant units should pay attention to overall planning and consideration, correctly handle mutual relations, work closely together, and jointly do a good job in social stability risk assessment of major issues. The evaluation should invite relevant experts and representatives of the public to participate in efforts to improve the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the assessment.
Part 4: Risk Assessment Implementation Plan
First, the guiding ideology
Major issues Social stability risk assessment is the political need to maintain social stability, and is also an inevitable requirement for thoroughly implementing the scientific development concept and promoting social harmony and progress. It is of great practical significance to prevent and reduce the occurrence of unstable factors from the source for effectively preventing and resolving the outstanding problems that affect stability. The main purpose is to make advance predictions, preliminary judgments, and early interventions on possible unstable factors before the implementation of major issues, and to eliminate unstable factors to the utmost extent.
Second, the scope of assessment
The major event evaluation project refers to major decisions concerning the vital interests of the people in the economic and social development of the new rural construction and key project construction in the whole town; major projects involving more vital interests of the people; and major issues involving a considerable number of people's vital interests Construction.
Third, the subject of responsibility
The town party committee and government are the main responsibilities of the social stability risk assessment for major issues. In the process of work development, we always adhere to the people-oriented principle, in accordance with the principles of “territorial management”, “who is in charge” and “who is responsible”, strengthen the awareness of “first responsibility”, adhere to scientific development, prior to the people, stability, and social stability. Risk assessment is a pre-program for major decision-making, major project implementation and major project construction. It is effective in scientific assessment and effective prevention.
Fourth, the main content
For all major issues, we must strictly adhere to the principles of comprehensiveness, objectivity, and accuracy, and adopt scientific prediction methods to make an early assessment of the unstable factors that may arise during the implementation of major events. There are five main aspects to the assessment:
Legitimacy of the implementation of major issues
1. Whether the formulation and promulgation of major issues conform to the Party's and the state's guidelines and policies, whether there are sufficient policies and legal basis, and whether it is inconsistent with current policies, laws and regulations.
2. Whether the targets and scope of policy adjustments and interest adjustments in major matters are accurately defined, and whether the basis for adjustment and adjustment is legal.
3. Whether the implementation of the major issues is in compliance with the prescribed decision-making procedures.
Rationality of the implementation of major issues
1. Whether major events conform to the laws of economic and social development, and whether it conforms to the people-oriented scientific development concept, does it represent the fundamental interests of the majority of the people.
2. Whether major issues have surpassed the affordability of the vast majority of the people, and whether the strength of reform, the speed of development, and social affordability are organically unified.
3. Whether major issues have been understood and supported by the majority of the people, and whether the real interests and long-term interests of the people are taken into account, and how the community and the broad masses of the people reflect.
Feasibility of implementing major issues
1. Whether it has undergone rigorous review and approval and approval procedures.
2. Whether it has undergone rigorous scientific feasibility studies.
3. Whether the plan is specific and detailed, and whether the supporting measures are perfect.
4. Whether the timing of the introduction of major events is appropriate and whether the conditions are mature.
5. Whether it will cause other towns, other industries, and other people to compare each other.
6. What is the major impact on the ecological environment, and whether there are scientific measures for pollution control and environmental protection.
Controllability in the implementation of major issues
1. Whether the formulation and introduction of major issues will lead to large incidents affecting public security and social stability, and what major problems may arise during the implementation process.
2. Whether there is a corresponding emergency response plan for possible social security and social stability issues.
Fifth, the implementation steps
To implement a risk assessment of major events, follow the steps and methods below:
The first step: determine the assessment object and fully grasp the situation. The major matters of the units affiliated to our town must be reported to the town party committee and government before implementation. The work plan shall be submitted by the town party committee and government, submitted to the county stability office, and the feasibility of the program shall be discussed and evaluated in the county stability office. After reporting and determining the first responsible person of the responsible party, the responsible person responsible for the implementation of the proposed major issues, in-depth and meticulous investigation and research, through access to information, visits to the public, questionnaires, public opinion evaluation, convening a symposium In the form of, to understand and grasp the relevant situation of the evaluated objects, to provide accurate and reliable first-hand information for predictive evaluation.
The second step: careful analysis and prediction, accurate assessment of risk. The town party committee and the government shall, based on the first-hand information on major issues that are known to be mastered, conduct an item-by-item scientific analysis, accurate prediction, and objective and impartial assessment of possible unstable factors.
The third step: formulate a maintenance plan and implement measures for maintaining stability. Study and formulate prevention and disposal work plans for the major risks involved in the prediction and evaluation. The plan should reflect the principles of thoroughness, specificity, clarity and feasibility.
The fourth step: prepare an evaluation report and actively resolve conflicts. According to the results of the previous, second and third steps, prepare a report on the social stability risk prediction and evaluation of major events.
Step 5: Review the evaluation report and strictly report and verify it. After the forecast evaluation report is formed, it will be reported to the county. The County Stability Office conducted an analysis and judgment on the major issues related to the assessment and evaluation in the report.
Part V: Risk Assessment Implementation Plan
In order to comprehensively implement the scientific development concept, correctly handle the relationship among reform, development, and stability, comprehensively implement source governance, effectively strengthen personnel management and scientific decision-making evaluation management, adhere to people-oriented, scientific development, and ensure rapid and stable economic and social development. This embodiment is specifically formulated.
I. Guiding ideology and principles
Hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics, take Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thinking of the 'Three Represents' as the guidance, adhere to the scientific development concept as the guide, take social contradictions and social management innovation as the goal, take the initiative to maintain stability, and may appear on major issues. The stability risks are pre-aware, early assessment, and early resolution, and efforts are made to prevent and resolve social contradictions that affect stability from the source and ensure social stability.
Second, the scope and content
The major issues referred to in this embodiment refer to the decisions, countermeasures, projects, and reform measures involved in the management of the Party School that involve the interests of the overwhelming majority of the people.
Risk assessment scope
1. Relevant major decisions concerning institutional reform and social security.
2. Relevant major decision-making matters concerning the interests of the people.
Content of risk assessment
1. Does it meet the interests of the majority of the people and whether it has a greater impact on the production and life of the people involved;
2. Whether it will lead to large-scale collective petitions or other mass incidents, and whether the measures and measures for resolving are feasible;
3. Where can the public raise reasonable objections and appeals, and whether they can properly resolve their reasonable demands within the scope of laws and policies; whether illegal and unreasonable appeals to the public can be obtained through propaganda, education, and counseling The understanding and support of most people;
4. In addition to the above-mentioned aspects, the problems encountered in carrying out work may seriously affect social stability, and risk assessment is also required.
Third, risk assessment š responsible subject
The main body responsible for social stability risk assessment is the functional department that formulates major issues. The department that makes decision-making and countermeasures is the responsible body for social stability risk assessment. The leading group for the stability of the Party School is responsible for the supervision, inspection and guidance of the social stability risk assessment.
Fourth, evaluation procedures and steps
Established a social stability risk assessment work leading group
According to the requirements of the "Measures for the Assessment of Social Stability Risk Assessment in Ji'an City", combined with the nature of the work of our school, it was decided to establish a leading group for the social stability risk assessment of the Party School of Ji'an Municipal Committee. The social stability risk assessment involving our school was organized by the leading group. The assessment is carried out and the lead team is responsible for developing the evaluation plan.
Conducting opinion polls
In accordance with the evaluation plan, each department will make public announcements, public announcements, and extensive publicity on the proposed matters, so that the people can fully understand the relevant content, and go deep into the public to solicit opinions. It is necessary to solicit opinions from many channels, in multiple forms, and through multiple channels, especially to solicit solicitation. Directly interested in the opinions and requirements of the people. It is necessary to collect, summarize and organize the opinions and suggestions of the people in a timely manner, and truly and completely reflect the wishes of the broad masses of the people.
Analytical argumentation
All departments will hold an analysis and demonstration meeting in time, inviting relevant personnel, relevant experts and representatives of the people who have direct interests in decision-making to participate, and the representatives of the people should account for a certain proportion. The departments involved made detailed explanations on the proposed decision-making matters, and accurately reported the opinion polls. The participants conducted serious and in-depth discussions, consultation and communication, analysis and evaluation, and scientific argumentation, and formed clear arguments after the meeting.
Evaluation result processing
The Leading Group of the Party School's Social Stability Risk Assessment Work conducted a comprehensive summary and analysis of the work, and made a social stability risk registration assessment for the assessment items. The risk is very high, and the risk is level 2 and the risk is very small. According to the social stability risk level, the implementation of major issues can be implemented, suspended or not implemented. For those who have certain risks, but comply with relevant laws and regulations and urgently need to implement matters, the responsible department should prepare prevention and disposal emergency plans in advance, and actively resolve social stability risks; And handling emergency plans, implementing specific measures to resolve social stability risks; for major problems with three levels of risks, it is necessary to formulate emergency plans for prevention and disposal, and do a good job of resolving social stability risks.
Reporting of the evaluation report
The assessment subject must submit the assessment report with the above three levels of risk to the school party committee, so that the social stability risk assessment leading group can study and discuss the solution and timely report to the superior maintenance and stability office.
V. Responsibility investigation
If the social stability risk assessment is not carried out without organizing the assessment or the organizational assessment, but the resolution and disposal measures are not implemented without reporting to the Office of Maintaining Stability, which leads to mass collective appeals or mass incidents, the principal responsible person of the relevant department Responsible investigation with the person directly responsible. Responsibility investigation is proposed by the Office of Maintaining Stability and Responsibility, and then led by the Maintenance and Stability Leading Group and coordinated with relevant departments.
To fully implement the scientific development concept, adhere to the people-oriented principle, maximize the fundamental interests of the broad masses of the people, establish and improve scientific decision-making and decision-making mechanisms for major issues in key construction projects, and effectively prevent and reduce the hidden dangers affecting the stability of engineering construction from the source, and maintain In a harmonious and stable social environment, combined with the actual situation of the Bureau, the following implementation plans are formulated.
First, the evaluation content
The social stability risk assessment for major issues referred to in this program refers to whether the decision-making and implementation of major issues in the key project construction area may lead to large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents for early prediction, preliminary judgment, and early intervention. Before making important decisions involving the interests of the people or organizing other major matters, the decision-making unit or organizational unit will take the lead in coordinating the relevant departments involved in major issues, soliciting opinions extensively, conducting research and judgment through investigation and research, and conducting risk assessment. report. According to the risk assessment report, risk resolution will be carried out for major risks, and the occurrence of letters and visits and unstable events will be prevented and reduced from the source to ensure the smooth implementation of major issues.
Second, the evaluation principle
Major issues Social stability risk assessment should adhere to the following principles: people-oriented, scientific decision-making; prevention-oriented, overall planning; who is responsible, who is responsible; who decides and who is responsible.
Third, the scope of assessment
According to the requirements of the due diligence evaluation, social stability risk assessment should be carried out for major issues that are closely related to the vital interests of the general public, involve a wide range of issues, have far-reaching impacts, and are prone to conflicts or disputes that may affect social stability. Major issues include:
Due to the construction of key projects, construction projects that may affect the production and life of units along the line and the people.
It is related to the major reform and restructuring of the staff and workers of the unit, the social security relationship, the treatment of employees and the disposal of major assets.
It is related to the frontline construction personnel, especially the wages of migrant workers, the major issues of maintaining their own rights and interests, and major decisions.
Emergency handling of sudden accidents and rectification of potential safety hazards during the construction of key projects.
Other matters that the party group and the organ think should be carried out for social stability risk assessment.
Fourth, the assessment content
In accordance with the principles of objectivity, accuracy, fairness and effectiveness, we will assess the possible impacts on security and stability.
Whether it complies with national laws and regulations and relevant policies.
Whether it has undergone rigorous and thorough feasibility argumentation and follows the principles of fairness, openness, and impartiality, and has fulfilled procedures such as consultation, publicity, and hearing.
Whether it has a greater impact on the production and life of the people involved, there is a risk of causing large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents.
Whether legal and policy channels can be used to properly resolve reasonable objections and demands from the public.
Whether it can be based on laws and policies to resolve the unreasonable demands that the public may raise, and ultimately gain the understanding and support of the majority of the people.
Whether to conduct pre-existing research and demonstration on the policies, such as compensation, resettlement, and security of the people, to avoid causing similarities in similar areas or similar matters in other regions.
There are other factors that may cause instability.
V. Organizational leadership
The assessment work is managed in a unified manner and is responsible for grading. Set up a working group on social stability risk assessment for major issues of the Bureau. It is also a member of the Bureau of Migrant Workers' Rights and Interests Maintenance Leading Group. It is responsible for coordinating the coordination of the social stability risk assessment of major issues. According to the division of functions, each room is responsible for the evaluation of specific matters, the person in charge of the department is the first person responsible for risk assessment, and the party is the person directly in charge.
Six, the evaluation program
Determine the assessment. All social security risk assessments are required for all matters related to the provisions of Article 4 of this program.
The organization conducts the assessment, and the first responsible person takes the lead in organizing a special evaluation team to be responsible for the specific assessment work. The various departments actively cooperate, extensively investigate and demonstrate, and predict the risk of pre-judgment. Expert consultation, sample survey, field survey, public notice, symposium, hearings, etc. may be adopted to solicit opinions, fully listen to the grassroots opinions and reasonable appeals of representatives of relevant interest groups, and summarize and organize opinions and suggestions. Accurately determine the possible social stability risks and put forward assessment opinions.
Form an assessment report. The evaluation team forms an evaluation report based on comprehensive analysis and argumentation, and realistically makes a risky, risky, risk-free or risk-free evaluation of the assessment, and proposes whether to implement it.
Develop a work plan. The major subject of risk, the assessment subject submits the assessment report together with the risk mitigation and emergency response work plan. For major issues that must be implemented in the case of unstable risks, the unstable risks are promptly submitted to the leading group, the bureau party group or the higher authorities for scheduling and dissolving.
The evaluation report is submitted. After the various departments form an evaluation report, they need to implement a dual filing, and report to the party group of the bureau for the record at the same time as the social stability risk assessment working group of the major matters of the reporting bureau.
Seven, relevant requirements
Pay close attention to the assessment. The main responsible persons of all departments must change their concepts, put the stability risk assessment work into the overall work, plan and implement it, earnestly implement it and achieve results. It is necessary to take the social stability risk assessment as a pre-program and necessary conditions for the introduction or implementation of major issues, so that major issues are not assessed and will not be decided.
Follow the evaluation program. It is necessary to carry out evaluations in strict accordance with the procedures, gradually improve and improve the procedures and standards for risk assessment, continuously carry out exploration and research, summarize and improve, and gradually improve the scientific, rational and operability of the assessment work.
Improve the level of assessment. In the implementation of the assessment, we must extensively solicit opinions from the public on the basis of comprehensive, thoughtful and meticulous principles, comprehensively consider the interests of all parties, do not engage in closed-door assessments, imagine assessments, and go deep into the public to grasp the problem of understanding and typical appeals. Be good at discovering the risks of real potential risks and continuously improve the evaluation level.
Focus on risk resolution. For major matters that can be implemented, which belong to the department at the same level, it is necessary to clarify the main body of responsibility and work requirements for risk mitigation. If it is necessary for the superior to coordinate, it must be reported to the relevant department at a higher level in time.
Strengthen assessment and assessment. It is necessary to take the social stability risk assessment of major events as a basic work to maintain stability, incorporate it into the daily assessment scope of each project site, incorporate the annual work target assessment content and employee performance evaluation of each department, and include the content of the year-end assessment of the leadership team and middle-level cadres.
Implement accountability. In the process of decision-making in major matters, which should be assessed without assessing or organizing the implementation of assessments in the form, prevention and resolving work is not implemented, not in place, causing instability or mass incidents, and seriously affecting social stability, will be in accordance with Hefei The Municipality maintains certain provisions on social stability work to conduct accountability investigations.
Part 2: Risk Assessment Implementation Plan
In order to comprehensively implement the scientific development concept, correctly handle the relationship between reform, development, and stability, handle the relationship between economic development and audit work in our county, and effectively maintain the harmony and stability of the county's overall social situation, and sustain the economy and society of our county. The health development is escorted and the implementation plan is formulated according to the requirements of the county.
I. Guiding ideology and principles
Guided by Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thinking of the "Three Represents", adhere to the scientific concept of development, adhere to the overall idea of maintaining stability and "going forward, shifting the focus, preventing prevention, treating both the symptoms and the root causes", and may appear on major issues. Stabilize risk early prediction, early assessment, and early resolution, and strive to prevent and resolve social contradictions that affect stability from the source to ensure local social stability. The social risk assessment adopts the principle of “local management” and “who is responsible and who is responsible”.
Second, the scope and content
The major matters referred to in this embodiment are my audit projects involving the interests of the overwhelming majority of the people in our county.
The scope of risk assessment.
Major audit projects involving the interests of the people of our city.
Content of risk assessment
1. Does it meet the interests of the majority of the people and whether it has a greater impact on the production and life of the people involved;
2. Whether it will lead to large-scale collective petitions or other mass incidents, and whether the measures and measures for resolving are feasible;
3. In addition to the above-mentioned aspects, the problems encountered in the work that may seriously affect social stability are also subject to risk assessment.
Third, the subject of risk assessment
The main body responsible for social stability risk assessment is the functional department that formulates major issues. Each unit of our bureau evaluates the major audit items involved in the scope of their respective duties.
Fourth, evaluation procedures and steps
Establish an interim assessment organization
According to the requirements of the county, combined with the nature of the work of the bureau, it was decided to set up an interim assessment team. The heads of the various units will form an assessment team and be responsible for formulating the evaluation plan.
Conducting opinion polls
Each stock room should widely publicize the audit to the public, so that the public can fully understand the relevant content of the audit. It should be widely consulted in many ways, in multiple forms and in multiple channels. In particular, it is necessary to pay attention to the opinions and requirements of the people directly involved. It is necessary to collect, summarize and organize the opinions and suggestions of the people in a timely manner, and truly and completely reflect the wishes of the broad masses of the people.
Analytical argumentation
In case of disagreement and major auditing projects that have objections, the hearings shall be organized in time to invite representatives of relevant personnel to participate. The participants will conduct serious and in-depth discussions, consultation and communication, analysis and evaluation, and scientific argumentation. After the meeting, clear arguments will be formed.
Evaluation result processing
The Bureau's Temporary Assessment Team conducts a comprehensive summary and analysis of the work, and makes qualitative treatments that can be implemented, suspended or not implemented in accordance with the social stability risk level. For those who have certain risks, but comply with relevant laws and regulations and urgently need to implement matters, the responsible department should prepare emergency plans for prevention and disposal in advance, and actively resolve the risks of social stability.
Reporting of the evaluation report
The assessment subject must submit the risk assessment report to the bureau's temporary assessment team, and study and discuss the solution and timely report to the county maintenance and stability office.
V. Responsibility investigation
If it is necessary to conduct a social stability risk assessment without organizing an assessment or an organizational assessment, but the resolution and disposal measures are not implemented without reporting to the Office to maintain a stable office, resulting in large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents, the relevant stocks are mainly The responsible person and the person directly responsible shall conduct accountability. Responsibility investigation is recommended by the Bureau's provisional assessment team for accountability, and then the Bureau maintains a stable leadership team.
Part III: Risk Assessment Implementation Plan
In accordance with the spirit of the Notice of the Municipal Party Committee Office and the Municipal Government Office on Printing and Distributing the Implementation Opinions on Promoting Social Stability Risk Assessment in the City, in order to thoroughly implement the scientific development concept, correctly handle the relationship between reform, development, and stability, and promote scientific and democratic decision-making. Level, prevent and reduce unstable factors from the source, promote the scientific and rapid development of the city's human resources and social security, and maintain social harmony and stability.
First, the guiding ideology
Adhere to the scientific development concept as the guide, take people's livelihood as the foundation, and give priority to talents. Improve the administrative and democratic decision-making mechanisms according to law, standardize administrative procedures and behaviors, scientifically assess the social risks of major decisions, major initiatives, and major policies, and fully consider the society. The sustainable ability of all groups and economic and social development, continuously improve the democratic, scientific, rational and operability of various policy decisions, ensure the development of human resources and social security and synchronize economic and social development, and guarantee the improvement of people's livelihood and people's expectations. Require synchronization and focus on building a happy Zhuzhou.
Second, the basic principles
The principle of unity of powers and responsibilities. In accordance with the general principles of “who is in charge, who is responsible”, “who decides, who is responsible”, “who approves, who is responsible”, all departments and units of the bureau are responsible for leading and organizing social stability risk assessment within the scope of their duties.
People-oriented principle. Adhere to the basic principle of putting people first and governing for the people, putting the fundamental interests of the people in the first place, and whether the people's people support and support is the basic standard and scale. In accordance with national laws and regulations and the party's principles and policies, in accordance with the normative procedures, comprehensive and in-depth analysis, scientific assessment and prediction, grasp the combination of the long-term interests of the people and the real interests, accurately judge, and minimize and reduce the hidden dangers and problems.
The principle of democratic decision-making. Adhere to the popular line, enhance the transparency of analysis and evaluation of major issues, and use public participation programs such as argumentation, hearing, and publicity to widely listen to and solicit opinions from all sides, and effectively protect the people's right to know, participate, and supervise. Listen to the expressions of the disadvantaged groups, maximize the consideration of the interests of different groups, and improve the democratic and scientific decision-making.
Third, the subject of risk assessment
Where the social stability risk assessment is to be carried out, the drafting department of the relevant policy, the implementation department of the relevant work, and the lead department determined by the bureau party group when the matters involve multiple departments are responsible for organizing the implementation of the social stability risk assessment. We must do a good job in social stability risk assessment. The organ that has the power to make a decision is the subject of responsibility for evaluating whether a major matter is feasible, and is responsible for making a corresponding decision based on the assessment report. The Office of the Bureau and the Office of Letters and Calls are responsible for the guidance, coordination and review of the social stability risk assessment work, and make recommendations to the party group to supervise the implementation of prevention and mitigation of social stability risks.
4. Key areas of social stability risk assessment work
Major decisions or policy adjustments. Major adjustments in policies including pension, medical care, unemployment, work injury, maternity insurance and minimum wage; major adjustments in active employment policies and entrepreneurial support policies; major adjustments in personnel management systems and wage and welfare systems in government institutions; military retired personnel Resettlement policies, major adjustments to the policy of enterprises' difficult military to cadres, and major adjustments to the social security policies of land-expropriated farmers.
Major work items. Implementation of major laws, regulations and policies of the state and the province, coordinating employment and social security issues in urban and rural development; employment of land-expropriated farmers and implementation of social security policies; assistance for groups with employment difficulties, especially the development and resettlement of public welfare posts Matters; adjustment of social insurance benefits such as pension adjustment for enterprise retirees; changes in social insurance service methods, service programs, service connotations; personnel examinations such as civil servant recruitment; recommendation, review and title evaluation of professional and technical personnel; Resettlement and distribution work; adjustment of incentives and performance evaluation rewards for government and public institutions; maintenance of legal rights and other matters such as wage payment for migrant workers.
It involves the reform and restructuring of the majority of the people. State-owned and collectively-owned enterprises, restructuring and restructuring, and the transfer of personnel and personnel transfer, social resettlement, etc.; relevant reform procedures involved in the reform of government and public institutions, personnel relocation, social security relations, and employee benefits.
V. Main contents of social stability risk assessment work
The assessment of the social stability risk of the matter involved should be evaluated in terms of safety, legality, rationality, feasibility, and whether there are other risks of inducing unstable events.
Assess legality. Mainly assess whether the formulation and promulgation of policy measures are in conformity with national laws, administrative regulations, local regulations and regulations, whether it conforms to the party's line policy and policies; whether major issues are in compliance with legal procedures; whether issues involving the interests of the public are fully implemented in accordance with laws and policies In place.
Assess the rationality. Does the main assessment conform to the requirements of the scientific development concept, whether it takes into account the interests of the overwhelming majority of the people, whether it takes into account the interests of different interest groups in all aspects, whether it takes into account the long-term interests and real interests of the people, and whether it follows fair, just and open in principle.
Evaluate feasibility. It is mainly assessed whether it has undergone democratic decision-making, whether it conforms to the overall level of local economic and social development, whether it conforms to the local financial and public burdens, whether it is in line with the long-term planning of local economic and social development, and whether it has relative stability, continuity and rigor. Wait.
Assess security. It mainly assesses whether there are signs of causing mass incidents, tendencies, whether there are other hidden dangers affecting social stability, whether there are corresponding early warning and emergency response plans, whether they are controllable, and whether there are specific measures to resolve conflicts and solve problems.
6. Procedures and measures for social stability risk assessment
Evaluate the basic program. Before making decisions, introducing policies, and implementing reform measures, we must conduct social stability risk assessment in accordance with the following basic program requirements.
1. Determine the evaluation project. Major issues that need to be organized for social risk assessment are generally determined by the responsible entity and may be determined or recommended by the bureau party group.
2. Develop an evaluation plan. The responsible entity collects relevant files and materials, adopts questionnaires, opinion polls and other means to grasp the basic situation of the assessment objects, reasonably formulate evaluation plans, and organize assessments in a timely manner.
3. Analyze and assess risks. Focusing on the legality, rationality, feasibility, safety and other related issues of the assessment items, we will conduct in-depth and in-depth understanding of the situation, solicit opinions and suggestions from direct interest groups, and conduct comprehensive analysis and research, especially after the implementation of the assessment items. The unstable factors appearing are analyzed and forecasted on a case-by-case basis, and the number, scope, and methods of the people involved in the unstable events may be evaluated and predicted.
4. Determine the risk level. The risk of social stability is divided into three levels: A, B, and C. If the public reacts strongly and may cause major unstable events, the assessment is Grade A; if the public reflects a large degree and may cause general instability, the assessment is Grade B; although some people's opinions differ, they may only lead to individual conflicts. The assessment is C grade. Before the evaluation report is formed, the responsible party shall propose a risk assessment proposal, and report it to the Municipal Stability Office after review by the bureau leader. Based on the investigation and analysis of the situation, the Municipal Stability Office approved the risk level of major decision-making matters and issued written opinions.
5. Form an assessment report. On the basis of sufficient argumentation and evaluation, according to the risk level approved by the Municipal Stability Office, the contractor shall prepare a social stability risk assessment report on the assessment items, risk analysis, assessment conclusions and response measures.
6. The conclusion of the evaluation is adopted. Those who are rated as Class A risk shall not be implemented. For the assessment of the B-level risk, the implementation is suspended. Or the contractor and the stability department will formulate a risk response plan, clarify the responsibilities, and formulate a solution to the contradiction before implementation. For the C-level risk, the contractor shall organize and implement the contradictory prevention and resolving work according to the relevant pre-plans.
Implement measures to maintain stability and responsibility. For matters that have some contradictions and problems but have been evaluated and implemented, the responsible main department must conscientiously implement specific measures to resolve contradictions and maintain social stability: in the case of deferred implementation of the assessment, it is necessary to timely study countermeasures and resolve conflicts. When the time is ripe, implement it again; resolutely terminate the implementation of matters that cannot be understood and supported by the majority of the people; and follow the whole process of tracking and maintaining the major issues that have been evaluated and implemented, and timely discover and resolve the conflicts encountered and The problem is to ensure the smooth progress of major issues; to formulate emergency plans for potential hidden dangers, to do a good job in the work of the people, and to prevent major problems affecting social stability.
Seven, work requirements
Strengthen organizational leadership. The establishment of the Bureau of Social Stability Risk Assessment Leading Group, Director Zhou Guangyao as the team leader, deputy directors Liu Yuxian, Liu Zegui, He Xiangyuan as the deputy leader, other bureau members and the principal responsible for the second division are members. The leading group office is located in the bureau office, and Liu Yuxian serves concurrently. Director of the office, Wang Ruhai is the deputy director, and other bureaus are members of various departments and second-level divisions. All bureaus and units of the bureau should attach great importance to the assessment of social stability risk, and take it as an important basic work to maintain stability. As a major task of coordinating interests and promoting social harmony and stability, it is feasible as a research and decision-making measure. Important reference. As the first responsible person of the undergraduate department and the unit to maintain stability, the principal person in charge should strengthen the organization and leadership of the social stability risk assessment work and timely study and solve the problems encountered in the work. Establish a regular, institutionalized, and standardized work process, and build a solid defense line for social stability from the source.
Strict assessment of accountability. From 20XX onwards, all departments and units must fully implement the social stability risk assessment work and effectively strengthen the implementation of the responsibility of the responsible party. The bureau office, supervision office, and petition office should strengthen work guidance and supervision and inspection, incorporate it into the annual assessment work, directly link with the evaluation of the first evaluation, and strictly implement the one-vote veto system for maintaining stability. In the event of an unstable event, the relevant provisions of the Plant Management Office [20XX] No. 35 shall be conducted to ascertain the implementation of the incident, cause, loss and social stability risk assessment of major decision-making, and the assessment shall not be evaluated or in the assessment. In the case of formalism, if the assessment is inaccurate or the prevention and resolving work is not implemented or in place, causing major unstable events and seriously affecting social stability, it is necessary to seriously investigate the responsibilities of relevant leaders and relevant personnel.
Adhere to overall planning and consideration. All relevant units should pay attention to overall planning and consideration, correctly handle mutual relations, work closely together, and jointly do a good job in social stability risk assessment of major issues. The evaluation should invite relevant experts and representatives of the public to participate in efforts to improve the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the assessment.
Part 4: Risk Assessment Implementation Plan
First, the guiding ideology
Major issues Social stability risk assessment is the political need to maintain social stability, and is also an inevitable requirement for thoroughly implementing the scientific development concept and promoting social harmony and progress. It is of great practical significance to prevent and reduce the occurrence of unstable factors from the source for effectively preventing and resolving the outstanding problems that affect stability. The main purpose is to make advance predictions, preliminary judgments, and early interventions on possible unstable factors before the implementation of major issues, and to eliminate unstable factors to the utmost extent.
Second, the scope of assessment
The major event evaluation project refers to major decisions concerning the vital interests of the people in the economic and social development of the new rural construction and key project construction in the whole town; major projects involving more vital interests of the people; and major issues involving a considerable number of people's vital interests Construction.
Third, the subject of responsibility
The town party committee and government are the main responsibilities of the social stability risk assessment for major issues. In the process of work development, we always adhere to the people-oriented principle, in accordance with the principles of “territorial management”, “who is in charge” and “who is responsible”, strengthen the awareness of “first responsibility”, adhere to scientific development, prior to the people, stability, and social stability. Risk assessment is a pre-program for major decision-making, major project implementation and major project construction. It is effective in scientific assessment and effective prevention.
Fourth, the main content
For all major issues, we must strictly adhere to the principles of comprehensiveness, objectivity, and accuracy, and adopt scientific prediction methods to make an early assessment of the unstable factors that may arise during the implementation of major events. There are five main aspects to the assessment:
Legitimacy of the implementation of major issues
1. Whether the formulation and promulgation of major issues conform to the Party's and the state's guidelines and policies, whether there are sufficient policies and legal basis, and whether it is inconsistent with current policies, laws and regulations.
2. Whether the targets and scope of policy adjustments and interest adjustments in major matters are accurately defined, and whether the basis for adjustment and adjustment is legal.
3. Whether the implementation of the major issues is in compliance with the prescribed decision-making procedures.
Rationality of the implementation of major issues
1. Whether major events conform to the laws of economic and social development, and whether it conforms to the people-oriented scientific development concept, does it represent the fundamental interests of the majority of the people.
2. Whether major issues have surpassed the affordability of the vast majority of the people, and whether the strength of reform, the speed of development, and social affordability are organically unified.
3. Whether major issues have been understood and supported by the majority of the people, and whether the real interests and long-term interests of the people are taken into account, and how the community and the broad masses of the people reflect.
Feasibility of implementing major issues
1. Whether it has undergone rigorous review and approval and approval procedures.
2. Whether it has undergone rigorous scientific feasibility studies.
3. Whether the plan is specific and detailed, and whether the supporting measures are perfect.
4. Whether the timing of the introduction of major events is appropriate and whether the conditions are mature.
5. Whether it will cause other towns, other industries, and other people to compare each other.
6. What is the major impact on the ecological environment, and whether there are scientific measures for pollution control and environmental protection.
Controllability in the implementation of major issues
1. Whether the formulation and introduction of major issues will lead to large incidents affecting public security and social stability, and what major problems may arise during the implementation process.
2. Whether there is a corresponding emergency response plan for possible social security and social stability issues.
Fifth, the implementation steps
To implement a risk assessment of major events, follow the steps and methods below:
The first step: determine the assessment object and fully grasp the situation. The major matters of the units affiliated to our town must be reported to the town party committee and government before implementation. The work plan shall be submitted by the town party committee and government, submitted to the county stability office, and the feasibility of the program shall be discussed and evaluated in the county stability office. After reporting and determining the first responsible person of the responsible party, the responsible person responsible for the implementation of the proposed major issues, in-depth and meticulous investigation and research, through access to information, visits to the public, questionnaires, public opinion evaluation, convening a symposium In the form of, to understand and grasp the relevant situation of the evaluated objects, to provide accurate and reliable first-hand information for predictive evaluation.
The second step: careful analysis and prediction, accurate assessment of risk. The town party committee and the government shall, based on the first-hand information on major issues that are known to be mastered, conduct an item-by-item scientific analysis, accurate prediction, and objective and impartial assessment of possible unstable factors.
The third step: formulate a maintenance plan and implement measures for maintaining stability. Study and formulate prevention and disposal work plans for the major risks involved in the prediction and evaluation. The plan should reflect the principles of thoroughness, specificity, clarity and feasibility.
The fourth step: prepare an evaluation report and actively resolve conflicts. According to the results of the previous, second and third steps, prepare a report on the social stability risk prediction and evaluation of major events.
Step 5: Review the evaluation report and strictly report and verify it. After the forecast evaluation report is formed, it will be reported to the county. The County Stability Office conducted an analysis and judgment on the major issues related to the assessment and evaluation in the report.
Part V: Risk Assessment Implementation Plan
In order to comprehensively implement the scientific development concept, correctly handle the relationship among reform, development, and stability, comprehensively implement source governance, effectively strengthen personnel management and scientific decision-making evaluation management, adhere to people-oriented, scientific development, and ensure rapid and stable economic and social development. This embodiment is specifically formulated.
I. Guiding ideology and principles
Hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics, take Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thinking of the 'Three Represents' as the guidance, adhere to the scientific development concept as the guide, take social contradictions and social management innovation as the goal, take the initiative to maintain stability, and may appear on major issues. The stability risks are pre-aware, early assessment, and early resolution, and efforts are made to prevent and resolve social contradictions that affect stability from the source and ensure social stability.
Second, the scope and content
The major issues referred to in this embodiment refer to the decisions, countermeasures, projects, and reform measures involved in the management of the Party School that involve the interests of the overwhelming majority of the people.
Risk assessment scope
1. Relevant major decisions concerning institutional reform and social security.
2. Relevant major decision-making matters concerning the interests of the people.
Content of risk assessment
1. Does it meet the interests of the majority of the people and whether it has a greater impact on the production and life of the people involved;
2. Whether it will lead to large-scale collective petitions or other mass incidents, and whether the measures and measures for resolving are feasible;
3. Where can the public raise reasonable objections and appeals, and whether they can properly resolve their reasonable demands within the scope of laws and policies; whether illegal and unreasonable appeals to the public can be obtained through propaganda, education, and counseling The understanding and support of most people;
4. In addition to the above-mentioned aspects, the problems encountered in carrying out work may seriously affect social stability, and risk assessment is also required.
Third, risk assessment š responsible subject
The main body responsible for social stability risk assessment is the functional department that formulates major issues. The department that makes decision-making and countermeasures is the responsible body for social stability risk assessment. The leading group for the stability of the Party School is responsible for the supervision, inspection and guidance of the social stability risk assessment.
Fourth, evaluation procedures and steps
Established a social stability risk assessment work leading group
According to the requirements of the "Measures for the Assessment of Social Stability Risk Assessment in Ji'an City", combined with the nature of the work of our school, it was decided to establish a leading group for the social stability risk assessment of the Party School of Ji'an Municipal Committee. The social stability risk assessment involving our school was organized by the leading group. The assessment is carried out and the lead team is responsible for developing the evaluation plan.
Conducting opinion polls
In accordance with the evaluation plan, each department will make public announcements, public announcements, and extensive publicity on the proposed matters, so that the people can fully understand the relevant content, and go deep into the public to solicit opinions. It is necessary to solicit opinions from many channels, in multiple forms, and through multiple channels, especially to solicit solicitation. Directly interested in the opinions and requirements of the people. It is necessary to collect, summarize and organize the opinions and suggestions of the people in a timely manner, and truly and completely reflect the wishes of the broad masses of the people.
Analytical argumentation
All departments will hold an analysis and demonstration meeting in time, inviting relevant personnel, relevant experts and representatives of the people who have direct interests in decision-making to participate, and the representatives of the people should account for a certain proportion. The departments involved made detailed explanations on the proposed decision-making matters, and accurately reported the opinion polls. The participants conducted serious and in-depth discussions, consultation and communication, analysis and evaluation, and scientific argumentation, and formed clear arguments after the meeting.
Evaluation result processing
The Leading Group of the Party School's Social Stability Risk Assessment Work conducted a comprehensive summary and analysis of the work, and made a social stability risk registration assessment for the assessment items. The risk is very high, and the risk is level 2 and the risk is very small. According to the social stability risk level, the implementation of major issues can be implemented, suspended or not implemented. For those who have certain risks, but comply with relevant laws and regulations and urgently need to implement matters, the responsible department should prepare prevention and disposal emergency plans in advance, and actively resolve social stability risks; And handling emergency plans, implementing specific measures to resolve social stability risks; for major problems with three levels of risks, it is necessary to formulate emergency plans for prevention and disposal, and do a good job of resolving social stability risks.
Reporting of the evaluation report
The assessment subject must submit the assessment report with the above three levels of risk to the school party committee, so that the social stability risk assessment leading group can study and discuss the solution and timely report to the superior maintenance and stability office.
V. Responsibility investigation
If the social stability risk assessment is not carried out without organizing the assessment or the organizational assessment, but the resolution and disposal measures are not implemented without reporting to the Office of Maintaining Stability, which leads to mass collective appeals or mass incidents, the principal responsible person of the relevant department Responsible investigation with the person directly responsible. Responsibility investigation is proposed by the Office of Maintaining Stability and Responsibility, and then led by the Maintenance and Stability Leading Group and coordinated with relevant departments.
recommended article
- Supermarket 5.1 Promotions
- July 1 commendation activity plan
- Equipment Management Implementation Plan
- Company opening ceremony planning plan
- Guoxiaoxin Teacher Training Program
- Celebration program
- Create a smoke-free unit implementation
- Village-level environmental sanitation improvement plan
- New Year's event plan for 2019
- Collective wedding planning
- 2014 organization life meeting plan
- Winter Fire Prevention Program 2019
popular articles
- Bing Xin’s famous words
- Teacher's Day Program for 2019
- Qq space mood phrase
- Sad love sentence 2019
- Du Yuexi's famous sayings
- Tao Xingzhi's famous sayings
- July 1st activity plan
- Taizai’s famous sayings
- Jiujiu Chongyang Festival Program in 2019
- Teacher's famous saying
- Classical life motto
- Deaf people jingle 2019
- Summer camp program for 2019
- Company activity planning
- 2019 annual training program
- Injured sentence
- I want to say something to the teacher.
- English famous words
- 2019 Christmas Eve event plan
- a good saying that loves labor
- Describe the fast time sentence 2019
- College entrance examination inspirational quotes
- In-house training program
- College student business plan
- Korean swear words
- The latest high school inspirational maxim
- Thanks to the friend's words 2019
- 2014 Mall National Day Festival Plan
- Strong words
- 2014 is very touching words