Social stability risk assessment program
Part 1: Social Stability Risk Assessment Program
In order to comprehensively implement the scientific development concept, correctly handle the relationship between reform, development, and stability, handle the relationship between economic development and audit work in our county, and effectively maintain the harmony and stability of the county's overall social situation, and sustain the economy and society of our county. The health development is escorted and the implementation plan is formulated according to the requirements of the county.
I. Guiding ideology and principles
Guided by Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thinking of the "Three Represents", adhere to the scientific concept of development, adhere to the overall idea of maintaining stability and "going forward, shifting the focus, preventing prevention, treating both the symptoms and the root causes", and may appear on major issues. Stabilize risk early prediction, early assessment, and early resolution, and strive to prevent and resolve social contradictions that affect stability from the source to ensure local social stability. The social risk assessment adopts the principle of “local management” and “who is responsible and who is responsible”.
Second, the scope and content
The major matters referred to in this embodiment are my audit projects involving the interests of the overwhelming majority of the people in our county.
The scope of risk assessment.
Major audit projects involving the interests of the people of our city.
Content of risk assessment
1. Does it meet the interests of the majority of the people and whether it has a greater impact on the production and life of the people involved;
2. Whether it will lead to large-scale collective petitions or other mass incidents, and whether the measures and measures for resolving are feasible;
3. In addition to the above-mentioned aspects, the problems encountered in the work that may seriously affect social stability are also subject to risk assessment.
Third, the subject of risk assessment
The main body responsible for social stability risk assessment is the functional department that formulates major issues. Each unit of our bureau evaluates the major audit items involved in the scope of their respective duties.
Fourth, evaluation procedures and steps
Establish an interim assessment organization
According to the requirements of the county, combined with the nature of the work of the bureau, it was decided to set up an interim assessment team. The heads of the various units will form an assessment team and be responsible for formulating the evaluation plan.
Conducting opinion polls
Each stock room should widely publicize the audit to the public, so that the public can fully understand the relevant content of the audit. It should be widely consulted in many ways, in multiple forms and in multiple channels. In particular, it is necessary to pay attention to the opinions and requirements of the people directly involved. It is necessary to collect, summarize and organize the opinions and suggestions of the people in a timely manner, and truly and completely reflect the wishes of the broad masses of the people.
Analytical argumentation
In case of disagreement and major auditing projects that have objections, the hearings shall be organized in time to invite representatives of relevant personnel to participate. The participants will conduct serious and in-depth discussions, consultation and communication, analysis and evaluation, and scientific argumentation. After the meeting, clear arguments will be formed.
Evaluation result processing
The Bureau's Temporary Assessment Team conducts a comprehensive summary and analysis of the work, and makes qualitative treatments that can be implemented, suspended or not implemented in accordance with the social stability risk level. For those who have certain risks, but comply with relevant laws and regulations and urgently need to implement matters, the responsible department should prepare emergency plans for prevention and disposal in advance, and actively resolve the risks of social stability.
Reporting of the evaluation report
The assessment subject must submit the risk assessment report to the bureau's temporary assessment team, and study and discuss the solution and timely report to the county maintenance and stability office.
V. Responsibility investigation
If it is necessary to conduct a social stability risk assessment without organizing an assessment or an organizational assessment, but the resolution and disposal measures are not implemented without reporting to the Office to maintain a stable office, resulting in large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents, the relevant stocks are mainly The responsible person and the person directly responsible shall conduct accountability. Responsibility investigation is recommended by the Bureau's provisional assessment team for accountability, and then the Bureau maintains a stable leadership team.
Part 2: Social Stability Risk Assessment Program
According to the work opinions of the Central Committee, the Provincial Party Committee and the Suzhou Municipal Committee on actively carrying out social stability risk assessment and the implementation measures of the city's “Social Stability Risk Assessment Work in the City”, effectively safeguarding the overall interests of the people's people and social stability, and adhering to the scientific development concept, Adhere to the people-oriented principle, promote the rapid and good development of the city's economy, and formulate this plan in combination with the actual planning and administrative licensing work of the bureau.
I. Guiding ideology and work objectives
Guided by Deng Xiaoping Theory, the important thinking of the "Three Represents" and the scientific outlook on development, conscientiously implement the Party's XX spirit and the general requirements for building a socialist harmonious society, correctly handle the internal contradictions among the people under the new situation, and prepare and implement the plan. In management, we must correctly grasp the relationship between maintaining public order in accordance with the law and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the people, and strive to achieve early and resolving of mass incidents and signs, control, and disposal, and solve problems in the bud. Minimize social and political impacts and economic losses, and create a long-term harmonious social environment.
Second, the scope of social stability risk assessment and the main content of the assessment
Scope of assessment: Major decisions related to the interests of the people's people, including urban old city renovation projects, planning changes in urban construction, etc.
1. Site selection of municipal facilities, substation, wireless transmission tower station, garbage transfer station, public toilets, public parking lots and other projects. If there are residential buildings in the surrounding area, it may affect the legitimate rights and interests of the citizens and trigger petitions.
2. Old town reconstruction plot
3. Major project planning
4. Planning administrative licenses that have a greater impact on the surrounding areas and involve more stakeholders
5. Residential project planning plan changes, etc.
The main content of the assessment:
The implementation risk assessment must include the following:
1. Legality assessment. It mainly assesses whether decisions, projects, and programs meet the requirements of laws and policies, and whether they conform to the principles and policies of the party and the state.
2. Rationality assessment. It mainly assesses whether decisions, projects, and programs take into account the interests of all parties and whether they take into account the realities and long-term interests of the people.
3. Feasibility assessment. It mainly assesses whether the timing of decision-making, project and program decision-making is mature, and whether it is compatible with the economic and social development level of the region.
4. Safety assessment. It is mainly to assess whether there are hidden dangers that affect social stability, such as major social conflicts, after the implementation of decision-making, projects and programs. Can these potential hazards be effectively eliminated and whether there are corresponding plans?
Third, the social stability risk assessment implementation steps
1. Identify the assessment items and develop an evaluation plan. The business department and its leaders in the planning and administrative licensing will make assessment recommendations based on the specific circumstances. The leading group shall determine the items included in the social stability risk assessment. The responsible department shall formulate the evaluation work plan in a timely manner, clarify the responsible leadership, organization form, time schedule and specific requirements, and do all the preparatory work.
2. Extensive research and demonstration to predict the risk of pre-judgment. According to the actual situation, the responsible department should take the form of expert consultation, special discussion, on-the-spot investigation, public announcement, hearing, etc., to fully listen to the demands of administrative counterparts and interested parties. And summarize and sort out opinions and suggestions, and strive to accurately determine the possible social stability risks.
3. Scientific assessment analysis and formation of an evaluation report. The Responsible Department analyzes and predicts various social stability risks that may arise, especially on the possible conflicts, the comprehensive determination of the objects, scope, problems and intensity, and forms the “Social Stability Risk Analysis and Evaluation Report”. Proposals for implementation, suspension or temporary implementation of the matter. And according to the hidden dangers, formulate coping strategies and emergency plans.
4. Review the assessment report and establish a filing system. The Responsible Department shall submit the Social Stability Risk Analysis and Evaluation Report to the Leading Group within 3 days after the end of the assessment. Evaluate the leadership team's audit report, review the implementation of the decision, suspend or not implement it. And submitted to the municipal social stability risk assessment work leading group office for the record.
5. Adhere to the whole process of tracking and implement dynamic assessment. After the social stability risk assessment items are put into practice through analysis and evaluation, the responsible department should constantly listen to relevant people's opinions, timely discover new risks and risks, and follow up countermeasures to ensure the smooth progress of the evaluation.
Fourth, accountability
The implementation of social stability risk assessment will be included in the management and assessment of work objectives. Those who have major hidden dangers or cause major group incidents due to the failure to implement social stability risk assessment work, and have significant impacts, shall be accountable to the responsible department, the leaders in charge and related responsible personnel.
V. Leading group
Team leader: Xu Zhenmin
Deputy leader: Sheng Xuedong
Members: Shan Junyi, He Jianming, Shen Jun, Chen Lixin, Shao Guilin, Zhang Yumei
Coordination: Office
Part 3: Social Stability Risk Assessment Program
In order to thoroughly implement the scientific development concept, correctly handle the relationship between reform, development, and stability, we will focus on preventing and reducing the contradictions and hidden dangers that affect social stability in the process of decision-making, implementation, and implementation of major issues, and safeguarding the overall social harmony and stability of the town. The spirit of the Notice of the CPC Ankang Municipal Committee Office and the Office of the People's Government of Ankang Municipality on Printing and Distributing the Implementation Measures for Social Stability Risks of Major Events in Ankang City, combined with the actual situation of our town, formulated this implementation plan.
First, the guiding ideology
Guided by the scientific outlook on development, adhere to the principle of stability overriding and stability first, establish and improve the social stability risk assessment and resolution mechanism, accurately predict, prompt, evade and resolve stability risks through mechanism innovation, and actively present potential or potential instability risks. Reduce the scope of social affordability, effectively prevent and overcome the tendency to grasp the reform and development and grasp the decoupling of social stability, prevent and overcome the hidden dangers caused by the deviation of decision-making, policies, projects, and reforms, and achieve the goal of passive stability and stability. Create a stable transformation, maximize the factors of harmony, minimize the factors of disharmony, ensure the harmony and stability of the overall social situation of the town, and create a stable social environment for the construction of a peaceful river and a harmonious river.
Second, the basic principles
Evaluate according to law. Strictly follow the legal permission and procedures, formulate comprehensive, scientific and standardized evaluation standards, adhere to the combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis, and take into account the relationship between development needs and affordability, and correctly perform statutory duties.
Scientific assessment. Respect the objective laws, use scientific methods to implement assessments, and combine realistic and forward-looking, make decision-making in line with the laws of social development, and effectively enhance the scientific, feasible, and authoritative assessment.
Democratic assessment. Strengthen investigation and research, extensively solicit opinions, and further broaden the channels for public participation in decision-making. For evaluation matters with large disputes, strong professionalism and wide influence, it is necessary to organize relevant departments and personnel to conduct hearings and arguments, so as to achieve public participation, expert argumentation and government decision-making, so that decision-making can reflect and reflect the people. The fundamental interests of the people.
Public assessment. In addition to matters involving state secrets, trade secrets and personal privacy, major decisions should be made public to the public in accordance with the law; and through the website, news media and other means to carry out extensive publicity to ensure the public's right to know, public opinion assessment and supervision.
Third, the scope of assessment and key areas
Main range
1. Major decisions concerning social management and social security that are of vital interest to a large number of people;
2. Policy formulation or revision concerning the people's livelihood issues that are of general concern to the people's population;
3. Reform or restructuring of enterprises and institutions that are related to the adjustment of major interests such as property rights transfer, asset disposal, and employee resettlement;
4. Municipal planning and project construction that may have a major impact on the production and life of the people in a larger or longer period;
5. Adjustment of industry policies involving the interests of many interest groups or larger groups;
6. Formulation and adjustment of major measures such as production safety, market safety, food safety, drug safety, major epidemics, and traffic safety;
7. Other matters that should be assessed for social stability risks.
Important area
1. State-owned and collectively-owned enterprises are reorganized and restructured, property rights transfer in the closure of bankruptcy, asset disposal, personnel diversion and social security, etc.;
2. Transfer of rural land and forest land management rights, peasant land acquisition, compensation and personnel resettlement in project construction and rural planning and construction, fundraising for infrastructure construction, labor employment and social security for migrant workers, cooperative medical care, family planning , agricultural production water and other policy fees related to farmers;
3. Adjustment of administrative divisions, renovation of old cities, planning of affordable housing and compensation for land acquisition, demolition and resettlement in urban infrastructure construction; adjustment of urban public utilities prices and charging standards to increase the burden of residents and enterprises;
4. Project site selection, physical investigation, land acquisition, compensation for demolition, resettlement, etc., involving resource development and transportation, water conservancy, public service facilities and other key projects;
5. Major adjustments to policies such as pension, medical care, unemployment, work injury, maternity insurance, minimum wage, minimum living security, and employment promotion; adjustment of educational fees; early warning, prevention and control of major epidemics;
6. The reform procedures of institutions and institutions, and the diversion and resettlement of personnel, asset disposal, social security relations, and adjustment of employee benefits;
7. The formulation and adjustment of environmental protection charging standards may result in changes in the environmental status or project construction of larger pollutants.
Fourth, the assessment content
Assess legality. Mainly analyze whether the formulation and promulgation of major issues are in line with the party and state policies, whether it is inconsistent with current policies, laws and regulations, whether there is sufficient policy and legal basis; whether the target and scope of policy adjustments involving major issues are Defining accuracy, whether the basis for adjustment is legal; whether to adhere to strict examination and approval and approval procedures.
Assess the rationality. It mainly analyzes whether the major issues are in line with the laws of economic and social development, whether it adheres to the scientific development concept of people-oriented, whether it meets the fundamental interests of the majority of the people, whether it exceeds the local financial resources and the affordability of the vast majority of the people, whether to strengthen the intensity and development of the reform. The speed and social affordability are organically unified; whether it is understood and supported by the majority of the people, whether the real interests and long-term interests of the people are taken into account, and how the community and the general public reflect.
Evaluate feasibility. It mainly analyzes whether public items such as necessary arguments, hearings, and public announcements have been evaluated; whether it has undergone rigorous and scientific feasibility studies; whether it meets the overall level of local economic and social development, and can be afforded by this level of financial resources; Stability, continuity and rigor; whether the timing of the introduction is mature; whether the constraints of time, space, manpower, material resources and financial resources are fully taken into account; whether the plan is specific, detailed, and whether the supporting measures are perfect; In place; whether major events will lead to the comparison of people in related industries and neighboring areas.
Assess security. Whether it meets the requirements of sustainable development and has a major impact on the ecological environment; whether the local people have strong reflections and requirements on the construction of the project; whether there are projects that may cause environmental pollution and ecological environment damage, whether there are scientific treatments and environmental protection measures, Whether it has the environmental appraisal or approval procedures of the relevant authoritative departments; whether the formulation and introduction of major issues will affect the safety of production, market, finance, food, transportation, etc., will it lead to a large incident affecting social security and social stability, and implementation What are the major social security problems that may arise in the process; whether it will bring about a major impact on the surrounding social security; before the implementation of major issues, the outstanding problems of public security and whether the chaotic areas have been effectively rectified.
Assess controllability. It mainly analyzes whether there are hidden dangers that may cause instability and mass incidents in major events; whether it is necessary to formulate corresponding preventive and early warning measures and emergency response plans for possible problems affecting social security and social stability, and whether there are countermeasures to resolve contradictions Whether the measures are within the controllable range.
V. Evaluation of the subject of responsibility
Major issues Social stability risk assessment Responsibility main body refers to the decision-making department, the policy drafting department, the project's reporting department, the reform leading department, and the major issues, the final decision-making and approval departments of major projects, and the formulation of major issues. Functional department. If the major issues are formulated by the party committee, the people's congress, and the government, the party committee, the people's congress, and the government shall assign the subject of assessment responsibility; if it involves multiple departments and functions, it is difficult to define the main body of responsibility, and the party committee and the government shall designate the responsible party. The specific division of labor of the key responsible departments is as follows: the Development and Reform Bureau is responsible for leading major reform decisions, etc. The Economic and Trade Bureau and the Economic Reform Office are responsible for the restructuring of the enterprise units to which the lead is affiliated; the Housing and Construction Bureau is responsible for the planning, construction, and house demolition of major urban construction projects. , residential property management and other aspects; the Land and Resources Bureau is responsible for land development, land regulation, reserves and mineral resources development for major construction projects; the Transportation Bureau is responsible for leading transportation; the Water Resources Bureau is responsible for soil and water conservation, water resources Utilization; the Environmental Protection Agency is responsible for ecology and environmental protection; the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau is responsible for social employment, labor security, labor and labor disputes, etc.; the Price Bureau is responsible for price management; the Health Bureau and the Food and Drug Administration are responsible for public health and medical services. Food and drug safety, etc.; Agriculture Bureau, Forestry Bureau is responsible for agricultural production, forestry ecology, forest tenure system reform, etc.; Poverty Alleviation Bureau is responsible for doing a good job in resettlement; other functional departments are responsible for doing a good job in this department and Systematic major issues social stability risk assessment work; towns Responsible for the implementation of major decisions within the administrative area, significant policy development, in charge of major projects, to assess the main responsibility for major reform measures. The Office of the Town Peacekeeping Office and the Joint Meeting of Letters and Visits is responsible for supervising, inspecting, guiding and coordinating the work of social stability risk assessment.
Six, the evaluation program
Determine the evaluation project. All evaluation items identified in this Implementation Plan shall be included in the scope of assessment and no omissions shall be allowed. All responsible entities shall report the social stability risk assessment plan of this year to the town stability planning office before the end of March; report the work progress report form before the 20th of each month; no unapproved matters will be approved.
Develop an evaluation plan. After the assessment items are determined, it is necessary to make reasonable evaluation plans, clearly assess the lead and assist departmental responsibilities, assess personnel responsibilities, etc., clearly assess the responsibilities, contents, methods, etc., organize assessments in a timely manner; and establish special work files to do a good job of standardized collection of materials and Organize for future reference.
Widely consulted. Responsible subjects should take the form of visiting the public, sampling survey, media publicity, holding hearings, holding discussions with stakeholders, organizing expert analysis and argumentation, etc., soliciting opinions and suggestions from all walks of life, especially interest groups, and accurately grasping the public's assessment matters. Attitude, do a good job in propaganda and interpretation, and promptly respond to questions from all walks of life and the public,
Major decisions and major projects are revised and improved.
Carefully analyze the forecast. According to the first-hand information on the major issues that are known to be mastered, according to the main content of the assessment, the unstable factors that may appear after the determination of major issues are analyzed and predicted item by item, and the assessment is made scientifically and objectively. When necessary, relevant experts, scholars, and party and government leaders may be invited to convene a stability risk assessment meeting and a hearing to conduct scientific argumentation. In particular, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the opinions and suggestions of interest groups, analyze the possible unstable factors item by item, evaluate the probability of predicting the risk, the number, scope and intensity of the people involved in the conflict, and the possible Negative effects, etc. For major and complicated problems, we must solicit opinions and suggestions from the higher authorities.
Divide risk levels. The responsible entity makes a risk level assessment based on scientific analysis and prediction and research and demonstration, and proposes implementation based on the risk level. The risk level is generally divided into four levels, the fourth level is risk free, the third level is less risky, the second level is risky, and the first level is risky. If the people are welcome, the conditions are mature, there is no risk of stability or the risk of stability is small, and the relevant measures can be resolved, and suggestions that can be implemented are put forward; if there is any objection to the people and relevant stakeholders, there is a certain risk of stability and it is difficult to resolve at one time. Proposing to suspend or partially implement the proposal, and implement it after the conditions are mature; if the concentration of hidden dangers is concentrated, the risk of stability is high, and group events or extreme events may be triggered, suggestions for not implementing it are proposed.
Form an assessment report. The evaluation leading group shall conduct scientific analysis and research and demonstration on the premise, timing and follow-up social impacts, supporting facilities, etc. of the assessment items, make an overall evaluation conclusion, and form an evaluation report. The assessment report generally includes the following contents: major decisions or generalization of major engineering projects, evaluation of relevant situations, analysis of stability risk factors, evaluation of stable risk levels, implementation of major issues, resolution of risk plans and plans for emergency response.
Determine implementation comments. The responsible entity determines whether major matters are implemented based on the opinions expressed in the assessment report, and submits major policy drafts, major project reports, and major reform plans to the organizations that have the authority to make decisions according to relevant decision-making procedures; the evaluation reports are approved and reviewed. After the review, it shall be submitted to the township-level responsible management for review and approval, and the decision on the major issues may be implemented, partially implemented, suspended or not implemented; and the township committee and the town government that have major problems related to stability shall be examined and approved. Once the assessment report has been approved, the responsible entity shall report the assessment report and the verification opinions to the town stability office and the town joint office for the record on the next day of the decision.
Implement countermeasures. After the implementation of major issues, the responsible department should formulate and implement countermeasures to resolve unstable factors and maintain social stability based on the analysis and assessment. It is necessary to formulate a response plan for possible hidden dangers, do a good job in public work, and prevent major incidents that affect social stability. In the process of implementation of major events, new major instability will occur. The responsible department shall promptly and properly handle the plan according to the plan, or make appropriate adjustments to major issues.
Seven, work requirements
Strengthen organizational leadership. All town offices and departments must attach great importance to the social stability risk assessment of major issues, and take it as an important basic task for maintaining stability and grasp the implementation. It is necessary to strengthen leadership, conscientiously deploy, meticulously organize, and set up a special work organization. The party and government leaders should bear the overall responsibility and be in charge of the leadership. The specific implementation measures and work plans should be formulated according to the implementation plan and the actual situation, on March 30. Recently reported to the town to maintain stability, joint office. It is necessary to improve the working mechanism, establish a regular and standardized workflow, and ensure that the evaluation work is carried out in an orderly manner.
Strictly enforce the system. All townships and departments should take the social stability risk assessment as the pre-program and necessary conditions for the implementation of major decisions, major policies, major projects, major reform measures, establish a strict working system, and resolutely eliminate blindness in social stability risk assessment. Make major events or project decisions. It is necessary to fully respect and apply the results of forecasting and evaluation, scientific decision-making, overall coordination, and take into account the interests of the state, the collective, and the individual. Anything that harms the interests of the majority of the people will not be done, and most people will not understand the policy of support. Resolutely not to introduce, prevent and reduce problems affecting social stability from the source. We must conscientiously sum up experience, constantly explore and innovate in practice, and gradually improve, and truly establish a long-term working mechanism that prevents the origin, maintains stability, and prevents problems before they occur.
Strengthen collaboration and cooperation. All departments and units must, in accordance with the requirements of “who is in charge, who is responsible”, “who approves, who is responsible”, “who operates, who is responsible” and the management of the centralized management, comprehensively implement the major areas of the jurisdiction, the system, and the unit. Matters for social stability risk assessment; it is necessary to establish a chess game, make overall plans, strengthen collaboration, cooperate with each other, and properly handle the relationship between responsible departments and relevant departments. We must persist in relying on the business department to evaluate the stability risks in making decisions, policies, projects, and reforms. We must also insist that the stability department should focus on the front line to understand the real situation and properly handle the stability department.
The relationship between the door and the business unit. It is necessary to correctly handle the relationship between the professionalism of the matter and the publicity of the personnel involved, and to do a good job in publicizing and explaining the professional knowledge. It is necessary to correctly handle the relationship between the opinions of the majority and the opinions of a few people, and do a good job in educating and guiding the work to prevent excessive and extreme behavior. The town maintains stability and the joint office is responsible for the supervision, coordination and guidance of this work.
Serious accountability. The town maintains stability and the joint office should increase supervision and inspection efforts, incorporate social stability risk assessment into annual target assessment, and strictly honor rewards and punishments. Corresponding to the assessment without assessing, or engaging in formalism and falsification in the assessment work, resulting in inaccurate assessment, or prevention of resolving work is not implemented, not in place, resulting in large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents, causing serious impact on social stability, Responsible investigation of the relevant units and their main responsible persons and directly responsible persons. For those who have passed the risk assessment in advance and implemented the risk response measures, but still cause large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents, which have serious impact on social stability, mitigate accountability as appropriate. In case of violation of discipline, disciplinary action shall be taken in accordance with relevant regulations.
Part 4: Social Stability Risk Assessment Program
To fully implement the scientific development concept, adhere to the people-oriented principle, maximize the fundamental interests of the broad masses of the people, establish and improve scientific decision-making and decision-making mechanisms for major issues in key construction projects, and effectively prevent and reduce the hidden dangers affecting the stability of engineering construction from the source, and maintain In a harmonious and stable social environment, combined with the actual situation of the Bureau, the following implementation plans are formulated.
First, the evaluation content
The social stability risk assessment for major issues referred to in this program refers to whether the decision-making and implementation of major issues in the key project construction area may lead to large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents for early prediction, preliminary judgment, and early intervention. Before making important decisions involving the interests of the people or organizing other major matters, the decision-making unit or organizational unit will take the lead in coordinating the relevant departments involved in major issues, soliciting opinions extensively, conducting research and judgment through investigation and research, and conducting risk assessment. report. According to the risk assessment report, risk resolution will be carried out for major risks, and the occurrence of letters and visits and unstable events will be prevented and reduced from the source to ensure the smooth implementation of major issues.
Second, the evaluation principle
Major issues Social stability risk assessment should adhere to the following principles: people-oriented, scientific decision-making; prevention-oriented, overall planning; who is responsible, who is responsible; who decides and who is responsible.
Third, the scope of assessment
According to the requirements of the due diligence evaluation, social stability risk assessment should be carried out for major issues that are closely related to the vital interests of the general public, involve a wide range of issues, have far-reaching impacts, and are prone to conflicts or disputes that may affect social stability. Major issues include:
Due to the construction of key projects, construction projects that may affect the production and life of units along the line and the people.
It is related to the major reform and restructuring of the staff and workers of the unit, the social security relationship, the treatment of employees and the disposal of major assets.
It is related to the frontline construction personnel, especially the wages of migrant workers, the major issues of maintaining their own rights and interests, and major decisions.
Emergency handling of sudden accidents and rectification of potential safety hazards during the construction of key projects.
Other matters that the party group and the organ think should be carried out for social stability risk assessment.
Fourth, the assessment content
In accordance with the principles of objectivity, accuracy, fairness and effectiveness, we will assess the possible impacts on security and stability.
Whether it complies with national laws and regulations and relevant policies.
Whether it has undergone rigorous and thorough feasibility argumentation and follows the principles of fairness, openness, and impartiality, and has fulfilled procedures such as consultation, publicity, and hearing.
Whether it has a greater impact on the production and life of the people involved, there is a risk of causing large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents.
Whether legal and policy channels can be used to properly resolve reasonable objections and demands from the public.
Whether it can be based on laws and policies to resolve the unreasonable demands that the public may raise, and ultimately gain the understanding and support of the majority of the people.
Whether to conduct pre-existing research and demonstration on the policies, such as compensation, resettlement, and security of the people, to avoid causing similarities in similar areas or similar matters in other regions.
There are other factors that may cause instability.
V. Organizational leadership
The assessment work is managed in a unified manner and is responsible for grading. Set up a working group on social stability risk assessment for major issues of the Bureau. It is also a member of the Bureau of Migrant Workers' Rights and Interests Maintenance Leading Group. It is responsible for coordinating the coordination of the social stability risk assessment of major issues. According to the division of functions, each room is responsible for the evaluation of specific matters, the person in charge of the department is the first person responsible for risk assessment, and the party is the person directly in charge.
Six, the evaluation program
Determine the assessment. All social security risk assessments are required for all matters related to the provisions of Article 4 of this program.
The organization conducts the assessment, and the first responsible person takes the lead in organizing a special evaluation team to be responsible for the specific assessment work. The various departments actively cooperate, extensively investigate and demonstrate, and predict the risk of pre-judgment. Expert consultation, sample survey, field survey, public notice, symposium, hearings, etc. may be adopted to solicit opinions, fully listen to the grassroots opinions and reasonable appeals of representatives of relevant interest groups, and summarize and organize opinions and suggestions. Accurately determine the possible social stability risks and put forward assessment opinions.
Form an assessment report. The evaluation team forms an evaluation report based on comprehensive analysis and argumentation, and realistically makes a risky, risky, risk-free or risk-free evaluation of the assessment, and proposes whether to implement it.
Develop a work plan. The major subject of risk, the assessment subject submits the assessment report together with the risk mitigation and emergency response work plan. For major issues that must be implemented in the case of unstable risks, the unstable risks are promptly submitted to the leading group, the bureau party group or the higher authorities for scheduling and dissolving.
The evaluation report is submitted. After the various departments form an evaluation report, they need to implement a dual filing, and report to the party group of the bureau for the record at the same time as the social stability risk assessment working group of the major matters of the reporting bureau.
Seven, relevant requirements
Pay close attention to the assessment. The main responsible persons of all departments must change their concepts, put the stability risk assessment work into the overall work, plan and implement it, earnestly implement it and achieve results. It is necessary to take the social stability risk assessment as a pre-program and necessary conditions for the introduction or implementation of major issues, so that major issues are not assessed and will not be decided.
Follow the evaluation program. It is necessary to carry out evaluations in strict accordance with the procedures, gradually improve and improve the procedures and standards for risk assessment, continuously carry out exploration and research, summarize and improve, and gradually improve the scientific, rational and operability of the assessment work.
Improve the level of assessment. In the implementation of the assessment, we must extensively solicit opinions from the public on the basis of comprehensive, thoughtful and meticulous principles, comprehensively consider the interests of all parties, do not engage in closed-door assessments, imagine assessments, and go deep into the public to grasp the problem of understanding and typical appeals. Be good at discovering the risks of real potential risks and continuously improve the evaluation level.
Focus on risk resolution. For major matters that can be implemented, which belong to the department at the same level, it is necessary to clarify the main body of responsibility and work requirements for risk mitigation. If it is necessary for the superior to coordinate, it must be reported to the relevant department at a higher level in time.
Strengthen assessment and assessment. It is necessary to take the social stability risk assessment of major events as a basic work to maintain stability, incorporate it into the daily assessment scope of each project site, incorporate the annual work target assessment content and employee performance evaluation of each department, and include the content of the year-end assessment of the leadership team and middle-level cadres.
Implement accountability. In the process of decision-making in major matters, which should be assessed without assessing or organizing the implementation of assessments in the form, prevention and resolving work is not implemented, not in place, causing instability or mass incidents, and seriously affecting social stability, will be in accordance with Hefei The Municipality maintains certain provisions on social stability work to conduct accountability investigations.
Part V: Social Stability Risk Assessment Program
First, the guiding ideology
Major issues Social stability risk assessment is the political need to maintain social stability, and is also an inevitable requirement for thoroughly implementing the scientific development concept and promoting social harmony and progress. It is of great practical significance to prevent and reduce the occurrence of unstable factors from the source for effectively preventing and resolving the outstanding problems that affect stability. The main purpose is to make advance predictions, preliminary judgments, and early interventions on possible unstable factors before the implementation of major issues, and to eliminate unstable factors to the utmost extent.
Second, the scope of assessment
The major event evaluation project refers to major decisions concerning the vital interests of the people in the economic and social development of the new rural construction and key project construction in the whole town; major projects involving more vital interests of the people; and major issues involving a considerable number of people's vital interests Construction.
Third, the subject of responsibility
The town party committee and government are the main responsibilities of the social stability risk assessment for major issues. In the process of work development, we always adhere to the people-oriented principle, in accordance with the principles of “territorial management”, “who is in charge” and “who is responsible”, strengthen the awareness of “first responsibility”, adhere to scientific development, prior to the people, stability, and social stability. Risk assessment is a pre-program for major decision-making, major project implementation and major project construction. It is effective in scientific assessment and effective prevention.
Fourth, the main content
For all major issues, we must strictly adhere to the principles of comprehensiveness, objectivity, and accuracy, and adopt scientific prediction methods to make an early assessment of the unstable factors that may arise during the implementation of major events.評估內容主要有五個方面：
重大事項實施出台的合法性
1、重大事項的制定和出台是否符合黨和國家的方針政策，是否有充足的政策、法律依據，是否與現行政策、法律、法規相牴觸。
2、重大事項所涉及政策調整、利益調節的對象和範圍是否界定準確，調整、調節的依據是否合法。
3、重大事項實施出台是否符合規定的議事決策程式。
重大事項實施出台的合理性
1、重大事項是否符合經濟社會發展規律，是否符合以人為本的科學發展觀，是否代表大多數民眾的根本利益。
2、重大事項是否超越絕大多數民眾的承受能力，是否把改革的力度、發展的速度和社會可承受度有機統一起來。
3、重大事項是否得到大多數民眾的理解和支持，是否兼顧了人民民眾的現實利益和長遠利益，社會各界和廣大人民民眾的反映如何。
重大事項實施出台的可行性
1、是否經過嚴格的審查審批和報批程式。
2、是否經過嚴謹科學的可行性研究論證。
3、方案是否具體、詳實，配套措施是否完善。
4、重大事項出台的時機是否合適，條件是否成熟。
5、是否會造成其他鎮鎮、其他行業、其他民眾的相互攀比。
6、對生態環境有何重大影響，是否有科學的治污、環保配套措施。
重大事項實施過程中的可控性
1、重大事項的制定和出台是否會引發較大的影響社會治安和社會穩定的事件，實施過程中可能出現哪些較大的問題。
2、對可能出現的影響社會治安和社會穩定問題，是否有相應的應急處置預案。
Fifth, the implementation steps
實施重大事項風險評估，按照以下步驟和方法進行：
第一步：確定評估對象，全面掌握情況。我鎮所屬單位的重大事項在實施前必須報告鎮黨委、政府，其工作方案由鎮黨委、政府提出，報送縣維穩辦，在縣維穩辦對方案的可行性進行討論並做出相應的評估報告，且確定責任主體的第一責任人後，由責任主體責任人對擬定出台的重大事項實施方案，深入細緻地開展調查研究，通過查閱資料、走訪民眾、問卷調查、民意測評、召開座談會等形式，了解並掌握所評估的對象的相關情況，為預測評估提供準確、可靠的第一手資料。
第二步：縝密分析預測，準確評估風險。鎮黨委、政府根據了解掌握的有關重大事項的第一手資料，對可能出現的不穩定因素進行逐項科學分析、準確預測、客觀公正地作出評估。
第三步：制定維穩預案，落實維穩措施。針對預測評估出來的涉及較大隱患，研究制定預防和處置工作預案。預案應體現周密、具體、清晰、可行的原則
第四步：編制評估報告，主動化解矛盾。根據前一、二、三步的工作結果，編制重大事項社會穩定風險預測評估化解報告。
第五步：審查評估報告，嚴格報告審定。預測評估報告形成後，報縣維穩辦。在縣維穩辦對報告中預測評估出的涉穩重大問題進行分析和判斷。
In order to comprehensively implement the scientific development concept, correctly handle the relationship between reform, development, and stability, handle the relationship between economic development and audit work in our county, and effectively maintain the harmony and stability of the county's overall social situation, and sustain the economy and society of our county. The health development is escorted and the implementation plan is formulated according to the requirements of the county.
I. Guiding ideology and principles
Guided by Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thinking of the "Three Represents", adhere to the scientific concept of development, adhere to the overall idea of maintaining stability and "going forward, shifting the focus, preventing prevention, treating both the symptoms and the root causes", and may appear on major issues. Stabilize risk early prediction, early assessment, and early resolution, and strive to prevent and resolve social contradictions that affect stability from the source to ensure local social stability. The social risk assessment adopts the principle of “local management” and “who is responsible and who is responsible”.
Second, the scope and content
The major matters referred to in this embodiment are my audit projects involving the interests of the overwhelming majority of the people in our county.
The scope of risk assessment.
Major audit projects involving the interests of the people of our city.
Content of risk assessment
1. Does it meet the interests of the majority of the people and whether it has a greater impact on the production and life of the people involved;
2. Whether it will lead to large-scale collective petitions or other mass incidents, and whether the measures and measures for resolving are feasible;
3. In addition to the above-mentioned aspects, the problems encountered in the work that may seriously affect social stability are also subject to risk assessment.
Third, the subject of risk assessment
The main body responsible for social stability risk assessment is the functional department that formulates major issues. Each unit of our bureau evaluates the major audit items involved in the scope of their respective duties.
Fourth, evaluation procedures and steps
Establish an interim assessment organization
According to the requirements of the county, combined with the nature of the work of the bureau, it was decided to set up an interim assessment team. The heads of the various units will form an assessment team and be responsible for formulating the evaluation plan.
Conducting opinion polls
Each stock room should widely publicize the audit to the public, so that the public can fully understand the relevant content of the audit. It should be widely consulted in many ways, in multiple forms and in multiple channels. In particular, it is necessary to pay attention to the opinions and requirements of the people directly involved. It is necessary to collect, summarize and organize the opinions and suggestions of the people in a timely manner, and truly and completely reflect the wishes of the broad masses of the people.
Analytical argumentation
In case of disagreement and major auditing projects that have objections, the hearings shall be organized in time to invite representatives of relevant personnel to participate. The participants will conduct serious and in-depth discussions, consultation and communication, analysis and evaluation, and scientific argumentation. After the meeting, clear arguments will be formed.
Evaluation result processing
The Bureau's Temporary Assessment Team conducts a comprehensive summary and analysis of the work, and makes qualitative treatments that can be implemented, suspended or not implemented in accordance with the social stability risk level. For those who have certain risks, but comply with relevant laws and regulations and urgently need to implement matters, the responsible department should prepare emergency plans for prevention and disposal in advance, and actively resolve the risks of social stability.
Reporting of the evaluation report
The assessment subject must submit the risk assessment report to the bureau's temporary assessment team, and study and discuss the solution and timely report to the county maintenance and stability office.
V. Responsibility investigation
If it is necessary to conduct a social stability risk assessment without organizing an assessment or an organizational assessment, but the resolution and disposal measures are not implemented without reporting to the Office to maintain a stable office, resulting in large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents, the relevant stocks are mainly The responsible person and the person directly responsible shall conduct accountability. Responsibility investigation is recommended by the Bureau's provisional assessment team for accountability, and then the Bureau maintains a stable leadership team.
Part 2: Social Stability Risk Assessment Program
According to the work opinions of the Central Committee, the Provincial Party Committee and the Suzhou Municipal Committee on actively carrying out social stability risk assessment and the implementation measures of the city's “Social Stability Risk Assessment Work in the City”, effectively safeguarding the overall interests of the people's people and social stability, and adhering to the scientific development concept, Adhere to the people-oriented principle, promote the rapid and good development of the city's economy, and formulate this plan in combination with the actual planning and administrative licensing work of the bureau.
I. Guiding ideology and work objectives
Guided by Deng Xiaoping Theory, the important thinking of the "Three Represents" and the scientific outlook on development, conscientiously implement the Party's XX spirit and the general requirements for building a socialist harmonious society, correctly handle the internal contradictions among the people under the new situation, and prepare and implement the plan. In management, we must correctly grasp the relationship between maintaining public order in accordance with the law and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the people, and strive to achieve early and resolving of mass incidents and signs, control, and disposal, and solve problems in the bud. Minimize social and political impacts and economic losses, and create a long-term harmonious social environment.
Second, the scope of social stability risk assessment and the main content of the assessment
Scope of assessment: Major decisions related to the interests of the people's people, including urban old city renovation projects, planning changes in urban construction, etc.
1. Site selection of municipal facilities, substation, wireless transmission tower station, garbage transfer station, public toilets, public parking lots and other projects. If there are residential buildings in the surrounding area, it may affect the legitimate rights and interests of the citizens and trigger petitions.
2. Old town reconstruction plot
3. Major project planning
4. Planning administrative licenses that have a greater impact on the surrounding areas and involve more stakeholders
5. Residential project planning plan changes, etc.
The main content of the assessment:
The implementation risk assessment must include the following:
1. Legality assessment. It mainly assesses whether decisions, projects, and programs meet the requirements of laws and policies, and whether they conform to the principles and policies of the party and the state.
2. Rationality assessment. It mainly assesses whether decisions, projects, and programs take into account the interests of all parties and whether they take into account the realities and long-term interests of the people.
3. Feasibility assessment. It mainly assesses whether the timing of decision-making, project and program decision-making is mature, and whether it is compatible with the economic and social development level of the region.
4. Safety assessment. It is mainly to assess whether there are hidden dangers that affect social stability, such as major social conflicts, after the implementation of decision-making, projects and programs. Can these potential hazards be effectively eliminated and whether there are corresponding plans?
Third, the social stability risk assessment implementation steps
1. Identify the assessment items and develop an evaluation plan. The business department and its leaders in the planning and administrative licensing will make assessment recommendations based on the specific circumstances. The leading group shall determine the items included in the social stability risk assessment. The responsible department shall formulate the evaluation work plan in a timely manner, clarify the responsible leadership, organization form, time schedule and specific requirements, and do all the preparatory work.
2. Extensive research and demonstration to predict the risk of pre-judgment. According to the actual situation, the responsible department should take the form of expert consultation, special discussion, on-the-spot investigation, public announcement, hearing, etc., to fully listen to the demands of administrative counterparts and interested parties. And summarize and sort out opinions and suggestions, and strive to accurately determine the possible social stability risks.
3. Scientific assessment analysis and formation of an evaluation report. The Responsible Department analyzes and predicts various social stability risks that may arise, especially on the possible conflicts, the comprehensive determination of the objects, scope, problems and intensity, and forms the “Social Stability Risk Analysis and Evaluation Report”. Proposals for implementation, suspension or temporary implementation of the matter. And according to the hidden dangers, formulate coping strategies and emergency plans.
4. Review the assessment report and establish a filing system. The Responsible Department shall submit the Social Stability Risk Analysis and Evaluation Report to the Leading Group within 3 days after the end of the assessment. Evaluate the leadership team's audit report, review the implementation of the decision, suspend or not implement it. And submitted to the municipal social stability risk assessment work leading group office for the record.
5. Adhere to the whole process of tracking and implement dynamic assessment. After the social stability risk assessment items are put into practice through analysis and evaluation, the responsible department should constantly listen to relevant people's opinions, timely discover new risks and risks, and follow up countermeasures to ensure the smooth progress of the evaluation.
Fourth, accountability
The implementation of social stability risk assessment will be included in the management and assessment of work objectives. Those who have major hidden dangers or cause major group incidents due to the failure to implement social stability risk assessment work, and have significant impacts, shall be accountable to the responsible department, the leaders in charge and related responsible personnel.
V. Leading group
Team leader: Xu Zhenmin
Deputy leader: Sheng Xuedong
Members: Shan Junyi, He Jianming, Shen Jun, Chen Lixin, Shao Guilin, Zhang Yumei
Coordination: Office
Part 3: Social Stability Risk Assessment Program
In order to thoroughly implement the scientific development concept, correctly handle the relationship between reform, development, and stability, we will focus on preventing and reducing the contradictions and hidden dangers that affect social stability in the process of decision-making, implementation, and implementation of major issues, and safeguarding the overall social harmony and stability of the town. The spirit of the Notice of the CPC Ankang Municipal Committee Office and the Office of the People's Government of Ankang Municipality on Printing and Distributing the Implementation Measures for Social Stability Risks of Major Events in Ankang City, combined with the actual situation of our town, formulated this implementation plan.
First, the guiding ideology
Guided by the scientific outlook on development, adhere to the principle of stability overriding and stability first, establish and improve the social stability risk assessment and resolution mechanism, accurately predict, prompt, evade and resolve stability risks through mechanism innovation, and actively present potential or potential instability risks. Reduce the scope of social affordability, effectively prevent and overcome the tendency to grasp the reform and development and grasp the decoupling of social stability, prevent and overcome the hidden dangers caused by the deviation of decision-making, policies, projects, and reforms, and achieve the goal of passive stability and stability. Create a stable transformation, maximize the factors of harmony, minimize the factors of disharmony, ensure the harmony and stability of the overall social situation of the town, and create a stable social environment for the construction of a peaceful river and a harmonious river.
Second, the basic principles
Evaluate according to law. Strictly follow the legal permission and procedures, formulate comprehensive, scientific and standardized evaluation standards, adhere to the combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis, and take into account the relationship between development needs and affordability, and correctly perform statutory duties.
Scientific assessment. Respect the objective laws, use scientific methods to implement assessments, and combine realistic and forward-looking, make decision-making in line with the laws of social development, and effectively enhance the scientific, feasible, and authoritative assessment.
Democratic assessment. Strengthen investigation and research, extensively solicit opinions, and further broaden the channels for public participation in decision-making. For evaluation matters with large disputes, strong professionalism and wide influence, it is necessary to organize relevant departments and personnel to conduct hearings and arguments, so as to achieve public participation, expert argumentation and government decision-making, so that decision-making can reflect and reflect the people. The fundamental interests of the people.
Public assessment. In addition to matters involving state secrets, trade secrets and personal privacy, major decisions should be made public to the public in accordance with the law; and through the website, news media and other means to carry out extensive publicity to ensure the public's right to know, public opinion assessment and supervision.
Third, the scope of assessment and key areas
Main range
1. Major decisions concerning social management and social security that are of vital interest to a large number of people;
2. Policy formulation or revision concerning the people's livelihood issues that are of general concern to the people's population;
3. Reform or restructuring of enterprises and institutions that are related to the adjustment of major interests such as property rights transfer, asset disposal, and employee resettlement;
4. Municipal planning and project construction that may have a major impact on the production and life of the people in a larger or longer period;
5. Adjustment of industry policies involving the interests of many interest groups or larger groups;
6. Formulation and adjustment of major measures such as production safety, market safety, food safety, drug safety, major epidemics, and traffic safety;
7. Other matters that should be assessed for social stability risks.
Important area
1. State-owned and collectively-owned enterprises are reorganized and restructured, property rights transfer in the closure of bankruptcy, asset disposal, personnel diversion and social security, etc.;
2. Transfer of rural land and forest land management rights, peasant land acquisition, compensation and personnel resettlement in project construction and rural planning and construction, fundraising for infrastructure construction, labor employment and social security for migrant workers, cooperative medical care, family planning , agricultural production water and other policy fees related to farmers;
3. Adjustment of administrative divisions, renovation of old cities, planning of affordable housing and compensation for land acquisition, demolition and resettlement in urban infrastructure construction; adjustment of urban public utilities prices and charging standards to increase the burden of residents and enterprises;
4. Project site selection, physical investigation, land acquisition, compensation for demolition, resettlement, etc., involving resource development and transportation, water conservancy, public service facilities and other key projects;
5. Major adjustments to policies such as pension, medical care, unemployment, work injury, maternity insurance, minimum wage, minimum living security, and employment promotion; adjustment of educational fees; early warning, prevention and control of major epidemics;
6. The reform procedures of institutions and institutions, and the diversion and resettlement of personnel, asset disposal, social security relations, and adjustment of employee benefits;
7. The formulation and adjustment of environmental protection charging standards may result in changes in the environmental status or project construction of larger pollutants.
Fourth, the assessment content
Assess legality. Mainly analyze whether the formulation and promulgation of major issues are in line with the party and state policies, whether it is inconsistent with current policies, laws and regulations, whether there is sufficient policy and legal basis; whether the target and scope of policy adjustments involving major issues are Defining accuracy, whether the basis for adjustment is legal; whether to adhere to strict examination and approval and approval procedures.
Assess the rationality. It mainly analyzes whether the major issues are in line with the laws of economic and social development, whether it adheres to the scientific development concept of people-oriented, whether it meets the fundamental interests of the majority of the people, whether it exceeds the local financial resources and the affordability of the vast majority of the people, whether to strengthen the intensity and development of the reform. The speed and social affordability are organically unified; whether it is understood and supported by the majority of the people, whether the real interests and long-term interests of the people are taken into account, and how the community and the general public reflect.
Evaluate feasibility. It mainly analyzes whether public items such as necessary arguments, hearings, and public announcements have been evaluated; whether it has undergone rigorous and scientific feasibility studies; whether it meets the overall level of local economic and social development, and can be afforded by this level of financial resources; Stability, continuity and rigor; whether the timing of the introduction is mature; whether the constraints of time, space, manpower, material resources and financial resources are fully taken into account; whether the plan is specific, detailed, and whether the supporting measures are perfect; In place; whether major events will lead to the comparison of people in related industries and neighboring areas.
Assess security. Whether it meets the requirements of sustainable development and has a major impact on the ecological environment; whether the local people have strong reflections and requirements on the construction of the project; whether there are projects that may cause environmental pollution and ecological environment damage, whether there are scientific treatments and environmental protection measures, Whether it has the environmental appraisal or approval procedures of the relevant authoritative departments; whether the formulation and introduction of major issues will affect the safety of production, market, finance, food, transportation, etc., will it lead to a large incident affecting social security and social stability, and implementation What are the major social security problems that may arise in the process; whether it will bring about a major impact on the surrounding social security; before the implementation of major issues, the outstanding problems of public security and whether the chaotic areas have been effectively rectified.
Assess controllability. It mainly analyzes whether there are hidden dangers that may cause instability and mass incidents in major events; whether it is necessary to formulate corresponding preventive and early warning measures and emergency response plans for possible problems affecting social security and social stability, and whether there are countermeasures to resolve contradictions Whether the measures are within the controllable range.
V. Evaluation of the subject of responsibility
Major issues Social stability risk assessment Responsibility main body refers to the decision-making department, the policy drafting department, the project's reporting department, the reform leading department, and the major issues, the final decision-making and approval departments of major projects, and the formulation of major issues. Functional department. If the major issues are formulated by the party committee, the people's congress, and the government, the party committee, the people's congress, and the government shall assign the subject of assessment responsibility; if it involves multiple departments and functions, it is difficult to define the main body of responsibility, and the party committee and the government shall designate the responsible party. The specific division of labor of the key responsible departments is as follows: the Development and Reform Bureau is responsible for leading major reform decisions, etc. The Economic and Trade Bureau and the Economic Reform Office are responsible for the restructuring of the enterprise units to which the lead is affiliated; the Housing and Construction Bureau is responsible for the planning, construction, and house demolition of major urban construction projects. , residential property management and other aspects; the Land and Resources Bureau is responsible for land development, land regulation, reserves and mineral resources development for major construction projects; the Transportation Bureau is responsible for leading transportation; the Water Resources Bureau is responsible for soil and water conservation, water resources Utilization; the Environmental Protection Agency is responsible for ecology and environmental protection; the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau is responsible for social employment, labor security, labor and labor disputes, etc.; the Price Bureau is responsible for price management; the Health Bureau and the Food and Drug Administration are responsible for public health and medical services. Food and drug safety, etc.; Agriculture Bureau, Forestry Bureau is responsible for agricultural production, forestry ecology, forest tenure system reform, etc.; Poverty Alleviation Bureau is responsible for doing a good job in resettlement; other functional departments are responsible for doing a good job in this department and Systematic major issues social stability risk assessment work; towns Responsible for the implementation of major decisions within the administrative area, significant policy development, in charge of major projects, to assess the main responsibility for major reform measures. The Office of the Town Peacekeeping Office and the Joint Meeting of Letters and Visits is responsible for supervising, inspecting, guiding and coordinating the work of social stability risk assessment.
Six, the evaluation program
Determine the evaluation project. All evaluation items identified in this Implementation Plan shall be included in the scope of assessment and no omissions shall be allowed. All responsible entities shall report the social stability risk assessment plan of this year to the town stability planning office before the end of March; report the work progress report form before the 20th of each month; no unapproved matters will be approved.
Develop an evaluation plan. After the assessment items are determined, it is necessary to make reasonable evaluation plans, clearly assess the lead and assist departmental responsibilities, assess personnel responsibilities, etc., clearly assess the responsibilities, contents, methods, etc., organize assessments in a timely manner; and establish special work files to do a good job of standardized collection of materials and Organize for future reference.
Widely consulted. Responsible subjects should take the form of visiting the public, sampling survey, media publicity, holding hearings, holding discussions with stakeholders, organizing expert analysis and argumentation, etc., soliciting opinions and suggestions from all walks of life, especially interest groups, and accurately grasping the public's assessment matters. Attitude, do a good job in propaganda and interpretation, and promptly respond to questions from all walks of life and the public,
Major decisions and major projects are revised and improved.
Carefully analyze the forecast. According to the first-hand information on the major issues that are known to be mastered, according to the main content of the assessment, the unstable factors that may appear after the determination of major issues are analyzed and predicted item by item, and the assessment is made scientifically and objectively. When necessary, relevant experts, scholars, and party and government leaders may be invited to convene a stability risk assessment meeting and a hearing to conduct scientific argumentation. In particular, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the opinions and suggestions of interest groups, analyze the possible unstable factors item by item, evaluate the probability of predicting the risk, the number, scope and intensity of the people involved in the conflict, and the possible Negative effects, etc. For major and complicated problems, we must solicit opinions and suggestions from the higher authorities.
Divide risk levels. The responsible entity makes a risk level assessment based on scientific analysis and prediction and research and demonstration, and proposes implementation based on the risk level. The risk level is generally divided into four levels, the fourth level is risk free, the third level is less risky, the second level is risky, and the first level is risky. If the people are welcome, the conditions are mature, there is no risk of stability or the risk of stability is small, and the relevant measures can be resolved, and suggestions that can be implemented are put forward; if there is any objection to the people and relevant stakeholders, there is a certain risk of stability and it is difficult to resolve at one time. Proposing to suspend or partially implement the proposal, and implement it after the conditions are mature; if the concentration of hidden dangers is concentrated, the risk of stability is high, and group events or extreme events may be triggered, suggestions for not implementing it are proposed.
Form an assessment report. The evaluation leading group shall conduct scientific analysis and research and demonstration on the premise, timing and follow-up social impacts, supporting facilities, etc. of the assessment items, make an overall evaluation conclusion, and form an evaluation report. The assessment report generally includes the following contents: major decisions or generalization of major engineering projects, evaluation of relevant situations, analysis of stability risk factors, evaluation of stable risk levels, implementation of major issues, resolution of risk plans and plans for emergency response.
Determine implementation comments. The responsible entity determines whether major matters are implemented based on the opinions expressed in the assessment report, and submits major policy drafts, major project reports, and major reform plans to the organizations that have the authority to make decisions according to relevant decision-making procedures; the evaluation reports are approved and reviewed. After the review, it shall be submitted to the township-level responsible management for review and approval, and the decision on the major issues may be implemented, partially implemented, suspended or not implemented; and the township committee and the town government that have major problems related to stability shall be examined and approved. Once the assessment report has been approved, the responsible entity shall report the assessment report and the verification opinions to the town stability office and the town joint office for the record on the next day of the decision.
Implement countermeasures. After the implementation of major issues, the responsible department should formulate and implement countermeasures to resolve unstable factors and maintain social stability based on the analysis and assessment. It is necessary to formulate a response plan for possible hidden dangers, do a good job in public work, and prevent major incidents that affect social stability. In the process of implementation of major events, new major instability will occur. The responsible department shall promptly and properly handle the plan according to the plan, or make appropriate adjustments to major issues.
Seven, work requirements
Strengthen organizational leadership. All town offices and departments must attach great importance to the social stability risk assessment of major issues, and take it as an important basic task for maintaining stability and grasp the implementation. It is necessary to strengthen leadership, conscientiously deploy, meticulously organize, and set up a special work organization. The party and government leaders should bear the overall responsibility and be in charge of the leadership. The specific implementation measures and work plans should be formulated according to the implementation plan and the actual situation, on March 30. Recently reported to the town to maintain stability, joint office. It is necessary to improve the working mechanism, establish a regular and standardized workflow, and ensure that the evaluation work is carried out in an orderly manner.
Strictly enforce the system. All townships and departments should take the social stability risk assessment as the pre-program and necessary conditions for the implementation of major decisions, major policies, major projects, major reform measures, establish a strict working system, and resolutely eliminate blindness in social stability risk assessment. Make major events or project decisions. It is necessary to fully respect and apply the results of forecasting and evaluation, scientific decision-making, overall coordination, and take into account the interests of the state, the collective, and the individual. Anything that harms the interests of the majority of the people will not be done, and most people will not understand the policy of support. Resolutely not to introduce, prevent and reduce problems affecting social stability from the source. We must conscientiously sum up experience, constantly explore and innovate in practice, and gradually improve, and truly establish a long-term working mechanism that prevents the origin, maintains stability, and prevents problems before they occur.
Strengthen collaboration and cooperation. All departments and units must, in accordance with the requirements of “who is in charge, who is responsible”, “who approves, who is responsible”, “who operates, who is responsible” and the management of the centralized management, comprehensively implement the major areas of the jurisdiction, the system, and the unit. Matters for social stability risk assessment; it is necessary to establish a chess game, make overall plans, strengthen collaboration, cooperate with each other, and properly handle the relationship between responsible departments and relevant departments. We must persist in relying on the business department to evaluate the stability risks in making decisions, policies, projects, and reforms. We must also insist that the stability department should focus on the front line to understand the real situation and properly handle the stability department.
The relationship between the door and the business unit. It is necessary to correctly handle the relationship between the professionalism of the matter and the publicity of the personnel involved, and to do a good job in publicizing and explaining the professional knowledge. It is necessary to correctly handle the relationship between the opinions of the majority and the opinions of a few people, and do a good job in educating and guiding the work to prevent excessive and extreme behavior. The town maintains stability and the joint office is responsible for the supervision, coordination and guidance of this work.
Serious accountability. The town maintains stability and the joint office should increase supervision and inspection efforts, incorporate social stability risk assessment into annual target assessment, and strictly honor rewards and punishments. Corresponding to the assessment without assessing, or engaging in formalism and falsification in the assessment work, resulting in inaccurate assessment, or prevention of resolving work is not implemented, not in place, resulting in large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents, causing serious impact on social stability, Responsible investigation of the relevant units and their main responsible persons and directly responsible persons. For those who have passed the risk assessment in advance and implemented the risk response measures, but still cause large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents, which have serious impact on social stability, mitigate accountability as appropriate. In case of violation of discipline, disciplinary action shall be taken in accordance with relevant regulations.
Part 4: Social Stability Risk Assessment Program
To fully implement the scientific development concept, adhere to the people-oriented principle, maximize the fundamental interests of the broad masses of the people, establish and improve scientific decision-making and decision-making mechanisms for major issues in key construction projects, and effectively prevent and reduce the hidden dangers affecting the stability of engineering construction from the source, and maintain In a harmonious and stable social environment, combined with the actual situation of the Bureau, the following implementation plans are formulated.
First, the evaluation content
The social stability risk assessment for major issues referred to in this program refers to whether the decision-making and implementation of major issues in the key project construction area may lead to large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents for early prediction, preliminary judgment, and early intervention. Before making important decisions involving the interests of the people or organizing other major matters, the decision-making unit or organizational unit will take the lead in coordinating the relevant departments involved in major issues, soliciting opinions extensively, conducting research and judgment through investigation and research, and conducting risk assessment. report. According to the risk assessment report, risk resolution will be carried out for major risks, and the occurrence of letters and visits and unstable events will be prevented and reduced from the source to ensure the smooth implementation of major issues.
Second, the evaluation principle
Major issues Social stability risk assessment should adhere to the following principles: people-oriented, scientific decision-making; prevention-oriented, overall planning; who is responsible, who is responsible; who decides and who is responsible.
Third, the scope of assessment
According to the requirements of the due diligence evaluation, social stability risk assessment should be carried out for major issues that are closely related to the vital interests of the general public, involve a wide range of issues, have far-reaching impacts, and are prone to conflicts or disputes that may affect social stability. Major issues include:
Due to the construction of key projects, construction projects that may affect the production and life of units along the line and the people.
It is related to the major reform and restructuring of the staff and workers of the unit, the social security relationship, the treatment of employees and the disposal of major assets.
It is related to the frontline construction personnel, especially the wages of migrant workers, the major issues of maintaining their own rights and interests, and major decisions.
Emergency handling of sudden accidents and rectification of potential safety hazards during the construction of key projects.
Other matters that the party group and the organ think should be carried out for social stability risk assessment.
Fourth, the assessment content
In accordance with the principles of objectivity, accuracy, fairness and effectiveness, we will assess the possible impacts on security and stability.
Whether it complies with national laws and regulations and relevant policies.
Whether it has undergone rigorous and thorough feasibility argumentation and follows the principles of fairness, openness, and impartiality, and has fulfilled procedures such as consultation, publicity, and hearing.
Whether it has a greater impact on the production and life of the people involved, there is a risk of causing large-scale collective petitions or mass incidents.
Whether legal and policy channels can be used to properly resolve reasonable objections and demands from the public.
Whether it can be based on laws and policies to resolve the unreasonable demands that the public may raise, and ultimately gain the understanding and support of the majority of the people.
Whether to conduct pre-existing research and demonstration on the policies, such as compensation, resettlement, and security of the people, to avoid causing similarities in similar areas or similar matters in other regions.
There are other factors that may cause instability.
V. Organizational leadership
The assessment work is managed in a unified manner and is responsible for grading. Set up a working group on social stability risk assessment for major issues of the Bureau. It is also a member of the Bureau of Migrant Workers' Rights and Interests Maintenance Leading Group. It is responsible for coordinating the coordination of the social stability risk assessment of major issues. According to the division of functions, each room is responsible for the evaluation of specific matters, the person in charge of the department is the first person responsible for risk assessment, and the party is the person directly in charge.
Six, the evaluation program
Determine the assessment. All social security risk assessments are required for all matters related to the provisions of Article 4 of this program.
The organization conducts the assessment, and the first responsible person takes the lead in organizing a special evaluation team to be responsible for the specific assessment work. The various departments actively cooperate, extensively investigate and demonstrate, and predict the risk of pre-judgment. Expert consultation, sample survey, field survey, public notice, symposium, hearings, etc. may be adopted to solicit opinions, fully listen to the grassroots opinions and reasonable appeals of representatives of relevant interest groups, and summarize and organize opinions and suggestions. Accurately determine the possible social stability risks and put forward assessment opinions.
Form an assessment report. The evaluation team forms an evaluation report based on comprehensive analysis and argumentation, and realistically makes a risky, risky, risk-free or risk-free evaluation of the assessment, and proposes whether to implement it.
Develop a work plan. The major subject of risk, the assessment subject submits the assessment report together with the risk mitigation and emergency response work plan. For major issues that must be implemented in the case of unstable risks, the unstable risks are promptly submitted to the leading group, the bureau party group or the higher authorities for scheduling and dissolving.
The evaluation report is submitted. After the various departments form an evaluation report, they need to implement a dual filing, and report to the party group of the bureau for the record at the same time as the social stability risk assessment working group of the major matters of the reporting bureau.
Seven, relevant requirements
Pay close attention to the assessment. The main responsible persons of all departments must change their concepts, put the stability risk assessment work into the overall work, plan and implement it, earnestly implement it and achieve results. It is necessary to take the social stability risk assessment as a pre-program and necessary conditions for the introduction or implementation of major issues, so that major issues are not assessed and will not be decided.
Follow the evaluation program. It is necessary to carry out evaluations in strict accordance with the procedures, gradually improve and improve the procedures and standards for risk assessment, continuously carry out exploration and research, summarize and improve, and gradually improve the scientific, rational and operability of the assessment work.
Improve the level of assessment. In the implementation of the assessment, we must extensively solicit opinions from the public on the basis of comprehensive, thoughtful and meticulous principles, comprehensively consider the interests of all parties, do not engage in closed-door assessments, imagine assessments, and go deep into the public to grasp the problem of understanding and typical appeals. Be good at discovering the risks of real potential risks and continuously improve the evaluation level.
Focus on risk resolution. For major matters that can be implemented, which belong to the department at the same level, it is necessary to clarify the main body of responsibility and work requirements for risk mitigation. If it is necessary for the superior to coordinate, it must be reported to the relevant department at a higher level in time.
Strengthen assessment and assessment. It is necessary to take the social stability risk assessment of major events as a basic work to maintain stability, incorporate it into the daily assessment scope of each project site, incorporate the annual work target assessment content and employee performance evaluation of each department, and include the content of the year-end assessment of the leadership team and middle-level cadres.
Implement accountability. In the process of decision-making in major matters, which should be assessed without assessing or organizing the implementation of assessments in the form, prevention and resolving work is not implemented, not in place, causing instability or mass incidents, and seriously affecting social stability, will be in accordance with Hefei The Municipality maintains certain provisions on social stability work to conduct accountability investigations.
Part V: Social Stability Risk Assessment Program
First, the guiding ideology
Major issues Social stability risk assessment is the political need to maintain social stability, and is also an inevitable requirement for thoroughly implementing the scientific development concept and promoting social harmony and progress. It is of great practical significance to prevent and reduce the occurrence of unstable factors from the source for effectively preventing and resolving the outstanding problems that affect stability. The main purpose is to make advance predictions, preliminary judgments, and early interventions on possible unstable factors before the implementation of major issues, and to eliminate unstable factors to the utmost extent.
Second, the scope of assessment
The major event evaluation project refers to major decisions concerning the vital interests of the people in the economic and social development of the new rural construction and key project construction in the whole town; major projects involving more vital interests of the people; and major issues involving a considerable number of people's vital interests Construction.
Third, the subject of responsibility
The town party committee and government are the main responsibilities of the social stability risk assessment for major issues. In the process of work development, we always adhere to the people-oriented principle, in accordance with the principles of “territorial management”, “who is in charge” and “who is responsible”, strengthen the awareness of “first responsibility”, adhere to scientific development, prior to the people, stability, and social stability. Risk assessment is a pre-program for major decision-making, major project implementation and major project construction. It is effective in scientific assessment and effective prevention.
Fourth, the main content
For all major issues, we must strictly adhere to the principles of comprehensiveness, objectivity, and accuracy, and adopt scientific prediction methods to make an early assessment of the unstable factors that may arise during the implementation of major events.評估內容主要有五個方面：
重大事項實施出台的合法性
1、重大事項的制定和出台是否符合黨和國家的方針政策，是否有充足的政策、法律依據，是否與現行政策、法律、法規相牴觸。
2、重大事項所涉及政策調整、利益調節的對象和範圍是否界定準確，調整、調節的依據是否合法。
3、重大事項實施出台是否符合規定的議事決策程式。
重大事項實施出台的合理性
1、重大事項是否符合經濟社會發展規律，是否符合以人為本的科學發展觀，是否代表大多數民眾的根本利益。
2、重大事項是否超越絕大多數民眾的承受能力，是否把改革的力度、發展的速度和社會可承受度有機統一起來。
3、重大事項是否得到大多數民眾的理解和支持，是否兼顧了人民民眾的現實利益和長遠利益，社會各界和廣大人民民眾的反映如何。
重大事項實施出台的可行性
1、是否經過嚴格的審查審批和報批程式。
2、是否經過嚴謹科學的可行性研究論證。
3、方案是否具體、詳實，配套措施是否完善。
4、重大事項出台的時機是否合適，條件是否成熟。
5、是否會造成其他鎮鎮、其他行業、其他民眾的相互攀比。
6、對生態環境有何重大影響，是否有科學的治污、環保配套措施。
重大事項實施過程中的可控性
1、重大事項的制定和出台是否會引發較大的影響社會治安和社會穩定的事件，實施過程中可能出現哪些較大的問題。
2、對可能出現的影響社會治安和社會穩定問題，是否有相應的應急處置預案。
Fifth, the implementation steps
實施重大事項風險評估，按照以下步驟和方法進行：
第一步：確定評估對象，全面掌握情況。我鎮所屬單位的重大事項在實施前必須報告鎮黨委、政府，其工作方案由鎮黨委、政府提出，報送縣維穩辦，在縣維穩辦對方案的可行性進行討論並做出相應的評估報告，且確定責任主體的第一責任人後，由責任主體責任人對擬定出台的重大事項實施方案，深入細緻地開展調查研究，通過查閱資料、走訪民眾、問卷調查、民意測評、召開座談會等形式，了解並掌握所評估的對象的相關情況，為預測評估提供準確、可靠的第一手資料。
第二步：縝密分析預測，準確評估風險。鎮黨委、政府根據了解掌握的有關重大事項的第一手資料，對可能出現的不穩定因素進行逐項科學分析、準確預測、客觀公正地作出評估。
第三步：制定維穩預案，落實維穩措施。針對預測評估出來的涉及較大隱患，研究制定預防和處置工作預案。預案應體現周密、具體、清晰、可行的原則
第四步：編制評估報告，主動化解矛盾。根據前一、二、三步的工作結果，編制重大事項社會穩定風險預測評估化解報告。
第五步：審查評估報告，嚴格報告審定。預測評估報告形成後，報縣維穩辦。在縣維穩辦對報告中預測評估出的涉穩重大問題進行分析和判斷。
recommended article
- July 1 commendation activity plan
- 2014 organization life meeting plan
- Equipment Management Implementation Plan
- Guoxiaoxin Teacher Training Program
- Collective wedding planning
- New Year's event plan for 2019
- Company opening ceremony planning plan
- Create a smoke-free unit implementation
- Supermarket 5.1 Promotions
- Winter Fire Prevention Program 2019
- Village-level environmental sanitation improvement plan
- Celebration program
popular articles
- College entrance examination inspirational quotes
- English famous words
- Injured sentence
- Summer camp program for 2019
- In-house training program
- Teacher's famous saying
- I want to say something to the teacher.
- Classical life motto
- Strong words
- a good saying that loves labor
- 2014 is very touching words
- Describe the fast time sentence 2019
- College student business plan
- 2019 Christmas Eve event plan
- Korean swear words
- Jiujiu Chongyang Festival Program in 2019
- Company activity planning
- Taizai’s famous sayings
- Thanks to the friend's words 2019
- Sad love sentence 2019
- Tao Xingzhi's famous sayings
- Deaf people jingle 2019
- Du Yuexi's famous sayings
- Qq space mood phrase
- 2014 Mall National Day Festival Plan
- Teacher's Day Program for 2019
- 2019 annual training program
- July 1st activity plan
- Bing Xin’s famous words
- The latest high school inspirational maxim