Secretarial knowledge > writing guidance

How to describe "performance" in the report


Generally speaking, the debriefing report requires the debrief to make statements and self-evaluation on the situation of morality, ability, diligence, performance, etc., so that the leaders and the public can understand, affirm and even appreciate the performance of the descriptive staff during the performance period. Among them, the presentation and presentation of “performance” is the top priority, and Germany, energy, and diligence must be extended and summarized based on “performance”. Therefore, in the debriefing report, how to write "performance" has become a core issue that writers must focus on.
First, with the point of the face, the point and face combination point and face are a pair of contradictions often encountered in artistic performance. “Face” is often expressed as a broad, general, general reason and fact; “point” is a specific fact or typical case. The face is composed of points. The face without points is empty and fuzzy. The point is prominent on the background of the face, showing its meaning. Without the face, the point has no meaning, and it also loses its foothold. . Depending on the needs of the expression, it is sometimes necessary to take a point with a face, and sometimes with a point.
In the process of debriefing, the debriefing will inevitably involve collective achievements. Collective achievement refers to the achievements obtained in the name of the entire organization or unit. For example, a certain company is rated as “consumer trustworthy enterprise”, and a certain university is rated as “advanced unit of scientific research work” and so on. For such achievements on the "face", there must be a "point" credit for the person in charge, which can naturally be written into the debriefing report. However, how to write the scores on this "face" in the process of debriefing really needs to grasp the sense of proportions - it has been written that it may give people a kind of suspicion; if they don't write enough or don't write, it will inevitably weaken or drown the reporters. Due to the achievements, it is easy to give people a bad impression that the person in charge of the narrator is not capable and has a heavy responsibility. Obviously, these two results are unwilling to be seen by the person in charge. This requires dealing with the relationship between the collective achievement on the "face" and the individual contribution on the "point", and grasping the strategies and techniques of writing. So, how to deal with the relationship between collective work and personal performance in actual writing? The person in charge of the job should adopt a writing strategy that combines face-to-face and point-to-face, which not only demonstrates collective work, but also brings out personal achievements and achieves an organic combination of points and faces.
For example, a toll station manager wrote in his report:
The annual toll station of the × state toll station is 16 million yuan. In response to this arduous task of charging, we conducted a collective study at the team meeting at the beginning of the year and formulated a practical and feasible strategy... overfulfilled the charging task.
The debriefing report mentioned the over-fulfillment of the 16 million yuan fee-based task, which is obviously the result of the joint efforts of the entire toll station and the correct leadership of the superior. There is a correct expression for the performance of such a “face”. In the article, the author used the phrase "We started a collective study at the team meeting at the beginning of the year and formulated a set of practical strategies." It pointed out that the achievement of the achievement came from the collective. It was not directly written about how I wrote it. This kind of writing is worthy of recognition. On the surface, it does not highlight its individual status and role. In fact, it implies that it is indispensable to it. It can be said that the words are hereby intended. And it will give people a sense of humility, and humility is clearly one of the traditional virtues that are highly respected, and naturally will win the goodwill of the report object. It is effective to describe collective work and show individual achievements.
In short, to take the point, first of all, it is necessary to clarify that the performance on the “face” contains the performance on the “point”. This is the premise. Secondly, it is necessary to carefully sculpt the words and correctly express the position of the individual in the collective achievement, not to greet others. The merits are not too self-effacing. Only by doing the above two points can we see the spirit in a subtle way and receive a good debriefing effect.
Second, in the case of virtual reality, virtual reality, when you conceive an article, you will encounter the problem of the relationship between virtual and real. The so-called imaginary and real, generally refers to the law of the unity of opposites when the object of expression is inked and not inked, tangible and intangible, specific and non-specific. Virtual, refers to the ethereal, emotional, fuzzy abstraction or the combination of life and thoughts; in fact, refers to the substantive, specific, and clear writing. Virtuality is not illusory, but always comes from real change. In terms of the writing of an article, illusion and reality can refer to the relationship between thought and material. It refers to the factual material of the article, while the virtual refers to the ideological viewpoint in the article. The writing of the debriefing report, especially the writing about “performance”, also has such problems.
Some of the performances in the debriefing report often need to be summarized and expressed in the form of subheadings, which will result in a “virtual” question that is often referred to as a paragraph. For such a general "virtual" problem, it is necessary to have a solid and effective "real" as support and support, and there must be real work and activities that have already been carried out. The facts must be conclusive, and the original reflects the true nature of the matter. Otherwise, "virtual" may be pale and powerless. Such as:
......
4. Innovate working methods to stimulate employment. In the 200× year reemployment work, we have put forward the “Ten, Hundred and Thousands” project in a targeted manner. In the same year, we established a typical example of self-employment in the city, and × × a laid-off employee demonstration shop, which absorbed a total of × × Ten thousand laid-off workers are re-employed. At the end of the year of 200×, we organized a large-scale warm-up event for “sending skills, sending jobs, and sending training” in the winter. We participated in various types of job-seekers×10,000 people, and signed employment agreements on the spot. ......
The "performance" of the debriefed performance is so powerful and convincing in such a de facto statement that it is true, and it can be said to "speak with facts." Such expressions will naturally be recognized by the leaders, the satisfaction of the people, and the affirmation of the review.
Of course, speaking with facts, avoiding falsification and ambiguity, you must not "add fuel and vinegar" or use the title to play, play with word games, make a superficial article; not allowed to be born out of nothing, arbitrarily created. The result of that kind of work must be self-defeating, and in the end, "the bamboo basket will be filled with water."

Third, the combination of suppression and promotion, highlighting the dialectical so-called suppression, refers to the dialectic of life in accordance with the truth of life and the dialectic of art, so that the plot arrangement, the development of things, etc., show the ups and downs in line with the objective of life and the subjective subjectivity of the author. It is worth noting that the use of the stagnation method must grasp the distinction between the primary and the secondary. When writing, it is necessary to focus on or suppress the intention of the text, and not to exert average force.
A good report on debriefing can't just be listed in the scores. It’s also possible to give people a sense of over-the-fact or the king’s love of selling melons. The general practice is that you can first raise and then suppress. That is to say, while "drying" your own achievements, it also shows out the problems or deficiencies of its own existence, what are the aspects that are worth improving, and so on. Only by objectively listing some of the personal problems in the debriefing report can the relevant departments or leaders feel your dialectical wisdom and self-criticism. This point is also reflected in the writing of the work style.
From the perspective of writing strategy, the latter "suppression" is not only a self-critic attitude, but also a good opportunity to enhance the personal image of the person in charge. Well handled, it can demonstrate the wisdom, courage and heart of the person in charge, effectively strengthen the "Yang" in front, and give the leader or judge a more comprehensive, profound and good impression. "There is no gold in the red, no one is perfect." In this case, we don't have to make a statement when we don't have to state our grades. When we talk about lacks or defects, we will twist and pinch. In fact, if you don't avoid the shortcomings in your performance, you will be able to turn the disadvantages into favorable ones, become passive and take the initiative, win the goodwill of the judges and the people, and add luster to your report. Such as:
In the 200× year, although I have achieved some achievements in my work, there are still some problems that need to be solved urgently. Mainly: lack of detailed guidance on the development and construction of scenic spots in this city, blindness and randomness; weak coordination and coordination with tourism-related industries, restricting the industry's leap to the industry; the bureau's political theory learning is not enough Tight, political and ideological work is not done in detail. These are all I will gradually solve in my future work.

1 2 3


It should be said that the self-dissection of the person in charge in the text is relatively pertinent. Moreover, such self-review will not only affect the value of the previous "performance", but will better highlight the credibility of the tellers and the credibility of "performance."
Fourth, the strip cutting, the outline of the chapter cutting is a structural layout method of the article. It refers to the basic requirement of conforming to the logical order of objective things when conceiving an article. According to the needs of the ideology, the structure is divided into a number of interrelated pieces, and the subtitles are used to guide the performance of the debrievers. For the application of writing, this method can better state the situation, clarify the thought or the purpose.
Most of the debrievers are supervisors and supervisors on the one hand and in many aspects. There may be many things and achievements to be described. Then, in the process of performance, we must establish a concept of splitting, layering, and introduction of blocks. We must not catch eyebrows and beards. In this way, it is possible to inundate a good score of considerable weight, and it may also give people a bad impression of the logical confusion of the debrief, thus affecting the quality of the debriefing report and causing the loss that could have been avoided.
For example, the debriefing report of the deputy secretary of the Party branch of a university branch:
Dear leaders and comrades:
Hello everyone!
I have served in the 200x year. In accordance with the duties of the deputy secretary of the Party branch, combined with my five aspects of virtue, ability, diligence, performance, and integrity, I would like to comment here.
I. On theoretical study and ideological and political work II. About party building and daily work III. About teaching work and teacher team building IV. About self-learning, self-cultivation and other five, about existing problems and future plans.
Please comrades to supervise.
Thank you for your debriefing.
The full text is divided into five pieces of organic connection, each of which has its own relatively independent content, which is combined to better explain the achievements of the person in charge and other conditions such as morality, energy, diligence and honesty. This kind of slitting and outline writing has in fact been widely recognized and adopted. In particular, in writing practice, it is important to grasp how to divide the blocks so that the leaders and judges can hear it. This requires the descriptive person to carefully plan and scientifically arrange according to the requirements of the superior and the actual situation of the unit, combined with personal responsibilities, so that the segment or the block can reflect the performance of the person in a more comprehensive manner without overlapping and content. Logic issues such as *.
Of course, the above strategy must be based on the fact that the descriptive person has achieved corresponding performance. Without this, the debriefing report becomes a passive water and a tree without a foundation. The strategy of being smart will also be useless. Therefore, it is the best policy to write a good report on the dedication of doing things in a down-to-earth manner.

recommended article

popular articles