News reporter's year-end summary

Near the end of the year, when summing up the work of the year, the evaluation activities flooded in some places, interfered with daily work, increased the burden of grassroots and enterprises, and contributed to the unhealthy trend, causing strong dissatisfaction among the people.

Appropriate and appropriate appraisal can reward advanced, spur progress, and promote work. Once the appraisal is overwhelming, it becomes a profit tool, formalism, bureaucracy, and it goes to the opposite side of the summary work. Recently, all levels of party committees, people's congresses, political consultative conferences, courts, procuratorates and other systems across the country have carried out centralized clean-up of the appraisal activities for appraisal, involving 75,589 projects, and restored 73,726 of them, with a recovery rate of 97.54%. According to estimates, this alone can save more than 2 billion yuan annually. The waste caused by the proliferation of assessments can be seen.

In addition to direct economic losses, the pollution of the social climate cannot be underestimated. In order to vote for the superiors, some units do not realistically arbitrarily set indicators, but they do not care much about how much they implement. Some units do not verify the reported digital moisture, but receive all the receipts. There are also some units that use the appraisal machine to make money and even appraise the prizes to the grassroots, enterprises and cadres. The appraisal of the appraisal has also given some opportunities for opportunistic candidates. Individuals regard the year-end appraisal as a good opportunity for evaluation, and dig into the rankings and rewards. Organizers and participants "take what they need", but they don't know but they have contributed to the sinister evils of falsification, bullying, extravagance, and even eating cards. How much burden has been added to the grassroots, and how many people complained!

"Golden Cup Silver Cup is not as good as the people's reputation." If the work of the government is good or not, it will ultimately depend on the satisfaction of the people. If the business is operated, it will ultimately depend on market recognition and disapproval. The inspection of the lower-level units by the higher-level units and the management of the enterprises by the industry associations should look at the people's reaction and market performance. The year-end inspection and evaluation is overwhelming, deviating from the basic requirements of the scientific development concept, not only delaying the work, but also losing the hearts of the people, revealing that some localities and departments and industry associations have used the wrong "ruler" and spent the wrong energy.

At present, China's economy and society are at a critical stage of rapid development. Various contradictions and problems are intertwined, and opportunities and challenges coexist. Whether it is an administrative agency or an industry association, it is necessary to put down the effort to check the facts and do practical things, and to focus on solving problems and planning development. Spending a lot of time and energy on doing unnecessary inspections and evaluations will inevitably affect daily work, and run counter to the goal of speeding up the reform of the administrative management system and building a service-oriented government.

The proliferation of appraisal is also closely related to the backwardness and low ability of some local and departmental management and service methods. Building a service-oriented government requires that the management be in the service and reflect the service in management. This requires all levels of government to change management concepts, innovative management methods, and use scientifically applicable and practical methods to assess the work of lower-level units, rather than simply using simple evaluation. The management of the industry association should also keep pace with the times, with more services and more help, without any constraints or confusion.

Curbing the appraisal and commending the excessively excessive momentum, correcting the year-end summary is conducive to promoting the truth-seeking and pragmatic style, helping to establish a correct view of political achievements, and helping the grassroots cadres to free themselves from the busy evaluation and put more thoughts into it. Use it to do business and spend more time on work. To reduce the evaluation activities, it is necessary to change the concept, and it is necessary to establish an evaluation mechanism in line with the scientific development concept through institutional innovation, avoiding “closed-door construction” and let the evaluation work truly exert a good social effect.