Community security precautions
** Comrades demanded that the public security organs should study and implement the scientific development concept in combination with actual work and solve practical problems in the in-depth study and implementation of the scientific development concept mobilization meeting. Based on this, the author conducted a survey on the community safety precautions in the city. The main problems and reasons for the current community safety precautions in urban areas of our city are as follows:
First, the working hours of community police are difficult to guarantee. The role of community police is difficult to play. From the perspective of community police, the working hours of the community are difficult to guarantee, and the role of community police is difficult to play. Community police are the backbone of community security work, and should play an important role in security and prevention: organization and guidance. Promotional role. Integration. Service role. However, for various reasons, it has affected the role of the community police. From a subjective point of view, the community awareness of the police is weak, and the quality of the police is not enough. The public security organs implemented the community policing strategy, and the police in the responsible area was renamed the community police. This is not a simple change of name, but a significant change in the management and service targets of the police. There are differences between the “community” and the “responsible area” in terms of the main body, principles and standards of the division. They are two completely different concepts. It can be said that the division of the community is more scientific, reasonable and standardized than the responsibility area divided by the police station according to the jurisdiction, because the community is divided on the basis of regional focus, resource sharing, identity and facilitation of residents' autonomy and service management. of. Some community policemen lack a correct understanding of the connotation of the community, and confuse the two. The concept of “based on the community and jointly fighting against the crime and maintaining public order with the community public” is not fully established, and the old practice is adhered to in the work, and it is difficult to adapt to the new situation. The requirements of community safety and prevention work affect the play of their own role. At the same time, the quality of the police also restricts the role of the community police. In practice, some community police officers have unreasonable knowledge structures and weak comprehensive skills. In particular, they do not understand the knowledge of modern community safety management. They do not master the rules of interaction between police work and residents under market economy conditions, resulting in a lack of overall planning in the work. It is difficult to effectively control and control community policing; some community policemen are accustomed to combating crimes, are not good at crime prevention and services, mobilize people's work, can't listen to people's criticism and suggestions, work methods are blunt and simple, causing people to misunderstand, Affect the development of security precautions. From an objective point of view, first, the functions of management and prevention are not guaranteed. Although the Ministry of Public Security stipulates that the main function of the police station is to manage and prevent it, and stipulate that it is not allowed to issue arrests, fines and fee indicators to the team, and effectively reduce the burden on the team, in fact, the focus of the police station has not been completely transferred. The public security organs successively issued to the police station a number of indicators of arrests, fines and fees. The completion of the indicators directly affected the honor of the unit and the future of the individual, causing many grassroots police stations to treat punishment and combat as hard tasks. Implement the community policing strategy as a soft task. This inevitably produces two kinds of results: one is that the community police will go into the community to work in time, the workload will not be effectively guaranteed, and they will not meet the requirements of integrating into the community, competing with the people, and tapping and utilizing community security resources. Some community residents have not seen a community police in a dozen days, and residents have to make appointments for police. The other is a police station with good prevention and management work. The police can not complete the arrest, fine and fee indicators, and can only enforce law across jurisdictions, otherwise it can only be punished. This has also greatly hampered the enthusiasm of the police for prevention and management. Second, the police are overwhelmed. The Ministry of Public Security stipulates that every police officer is responsible for the jurisdiction of 1,000 households. In fact, the number of residents in charge of the police in the city has reached more than 3,000, and some have reached 6,000, more than five times the regulations, plus the handling of daily security cases and various The service work, the public security patrol work, the workload can be seen. Moreover, there are too many things in the form of community policing. The community policing office is full of rules, duties, obligations, methods, institutions, personnel lists, etc. Some people describe it as "psoriasis" and a book of the community police. This book is thicker than a book. It is necessary to fill in several books and multiple repetitive tasks when accepting a case. In contrast to the main duties of the community police, the community police are a bit "not doing business", and the public security organs at the higher levels have too many "frames" for the community police. Third, the community construction is not perfect. Community building is the basis for security prevention. Most of the communities in developed countries in Europe and America are naturally formed in the process of long-term urbanization. However, the characteristics of community administration in China at present are obvious, and community construction is still in its infancy. The public infrastructure of culture, health, and services in the community is relatively lagging behind. The functional departments of the government lack communication with the public security organs, and there is no effective work force. The resources that community defense can rely on are not very rich. In particular, the community's autonomy and self-management awareness are not strong, and the sense of belonging and identity to the community is low. They are still accustomed to the obedience management and passive behaviors of the economic era, and lack the initiative to participate in community management and construction. This situation has not only increased the difficulty of the police to mobilize the enthusiasm of the public, but also affected the role of the community police. Fourth, the assessment of the work of the community police is not reasonable enough. In practice, the unreasonable assessment of the work of the community police is mainly manifested in the fact that there is a “one size fits all” phenomenon in the assessment. The content of the assessment focuses on the form to ignore the substantive content, resulting in some civilian police not working in peace, assessing for assessment, engaging in formalism, practicing fraud, and deviating. The purpose of the community policing strategy; the investigation and punishment of criminals and cases of cracked cases accounted for a heavier score in the assessment, misleading the police to deviate from the focus of work. The fifth is the deterioration of the law enforcement environment and the enthusiasm of the police. In recent years, the police have been obstructed by the implementation of official duties in accordance with the law, and the incidents of infringement have emerged in an endless stream. The incidents of violating police, disturbing police, assaulting police and maliciously complaining about the police have occurred frequently. However, in dealing with these incidents, they are often not strict enough. The parties are not able to get the punishment they deserve. In addition to the media’s misreporting and misleading, the police have placed the police in a weak position, which has seriously hampered the enthusiasm of the police. The work of the police does not contribute to the phenomenon of passive perfunctory.
Second, the group anti-group governance in name of the real situation Under the new situation, the group defense work has changed from administrative to non-governmental, and the group defense personnel have changed from the original "unit person" to "social person." Although the group defense group has been established in form and is still relatively rich, but in terms of actual operation, it is in a state of paralysis, and there has been a "five difficulties" problem, that is, "the concept is difficult to change, the fundraising is difficult, and personnel are launched. Difficulties, difficult interaction between police and civilians, and prevention of implementation difficulties. Because some leaders and civilian police are accustomed to using the administrative orders formed under the economic conditions of the plan, they are still limited to the traditional old ideas and old routines in organizing the implementation of group defense and group work. They are unwilling or not good at making fine Propaganda and organization of work, so as to eat "closed doors" under the new situation, can not effectively mobilize the enthusiasm, initiative and creativity of the people. In addition, at present, in the city, the daily management funds for group defense are based on the principle of voluntariness. Financial arrangements are adopted. The beneficiary units and individuals have a little point to carry out the convenience of the people to solve the problem. However, due to the strengthening of the legal awareness of the members of the society and the "taxpayer's awareness", they believe that they have already paid taxes, and the state should guarantee the safety of taxpayers. Naturally, there is no need to pay for security work. Therefore, this method is adopted. Raising funds is very difficult. This has led to a chain reaction of “difficulty in conceptual change, difficulty in raising funds, difficulty in launching personnel, difficulty in interacting with police and civilians, and prevention of implementation difficulties”.
Third, the community cadres are basically indifferent to the security issues With the warming of community construction, many government departments have extended their functional tasks to the community. The community can't refuse the tasks assigned by the higher authorities, only try to cope with them, the work tasks are particularly heavy, and they are overloaded for a long time. The survey shows that its annual work, stage work, seasonal work, temporary work, report ledgers, etc. have accumulated more than 100. It takes 2/3 of the time for community cadres to cope with various forms of inspection and evaluation. . At the same time, the cultural level of community cadres is generally not high, and the knowledge structure is single, while the higher levels of the departments are more tasks, requirements, and results, but the education and training of community workers is not enough, subject to cultural level and knowledge structure. Limit, lack of a solid work theory basis and leadership experience, organizational talent, coordination ability, language expression ability and scientific work methods, work hard and no innovation, and increase the difficulty of work. In addition, because other work has special funds, and comprehensive management is not, plus the "one-vote veto system" of comprehensive management is not as rigid as family planning. Therefore, community cadres are of course more willing to do work with subsidies and leadership attention, and basically have no regard for public security issues.
Fourth, community residents have insufficient self-defense awareness, and the awareness of “paying for money to buy peace” is not strong. Community residents’ self-defense awareness is an important part of community security. However, community residents are less self-defense, and the resulting cases account for 40% of the number of cases. Such as theft, scams, scams, motor vehicles, bicycles, and theft caused by the chaos, are caused by the lack of self-defense awareness of community residents. The lack of awareness of self-defense is also reflected in the reporting rate. The investigation found that the reporting rate of general cases of residents did not reach 70%. The case was not reported, and the low reporting rate was mainly due to the high cost of reporting and the low rate of detection. In the investigation, some residents thought that the report should be made with the police to send the transcripts, from a few hours to more than half a day. In one case, several times to the police station, several transcripts, and not a transcript. Can break, the loss can be taken back, or self-confessed bad luck. On the other hand, the general public lacks the awareness of “spending money to buy security”. The concept that security service is a kind of "commodity" has not yet been established. The general public relies too much on the power of the government. It is considered that the maintenance of public security is the responsibility of the public security organs. "There is something to look for in the government and blame the police." However, they did not realize that government agencies only provide the basic public security guarantees to the society and cannot meet the special security needs of the units and citizens. Since the reform and opening up more than 30 years, many people, organizations, experts and scholars have called for the government to transition from the "universal government" to the "limited government", but there is less awareness of the public's dependence on the government. The people still pin their own personal and property safety to the government, and do not want to spend money to increase security.
5. Technical defense is not universal and the layout is unscientific. Many units and people are reluctant to invest more in security. Even if some citizens are willing to pay for their own security, they are also limited to the traditional physical defense of “door-to-door”. It is a person who hires property and security personnel, and conducts civil defenses that are strictly guarded. Most citizens know little about technology prevention, or even do not understand it at all, let alone use technology as a commodity to enhance their lives and property. The public security organs unified the organization and installation of technical defense, and the units and the public were suspicious of fund-raising. Therefore, the promotion of technical defense has great difficulties.
In addition, there are still many problems in the prevention of the problem, the leakage management rate of the floating population is high, and the key population is managed by the location of the permanent residence, which causes the key population of the foreigners to become the object of leakage; the helper does not cooperate, and the difficulty of helping the work Large; the owner of the renter is too frequent to change, unable to contact the owner, and the difficulty of managing the tenant is also a prominent problem in public security prevention.
First, the working hours of community police are difficult to guarantee. The role of community police is difficult to play. From the perspective of community police, the working hours of the community are difficult to guarantee, and the role of community police is difficult to play. Community police are the backbone of community security work, and should play an important role in security and prevention: organization and guidance. Promotional role. Integration. Service role. However, for various reasons, it has affected the role of the community police. From a subjective point of view, the community awareness of the police is weak, and the quality of the police is not enough. The public security organs implemented the community policing strategy, and the police in the responsible area was renamed the community police. This is not a simple change of name, but a significant change in the management and service targets of the police. There are differences between the “community” and the “responsible area” in terms of the main body, principles and standards of the division. They are two completely different concepts. It can be said that the division of the community is more scientific, reasonable and standardized than the responsibility area divided by the police station according to the jurisdiction, because the community is divided on the basis of regional focus, resource sharing, identity and facilitation of residents' autonomy and service management. of. Some community policemen lack a correct understanding of the connotation of the community, and confuse the two. The concept of “based on the community and jointly fighting against the crime and maintaining public order with the community public” is not fully established, and the old practice is adhered to in the work, and it is difficult to adapt to the new situation. The requirements of community safety and prevention work affect the play of their own role. At the same time, the quality of the police also restricts the role of the community police. In practice, some community police officers have unreasonable knowledge structures and weak comprehensive skills. In particular, they do not understand the knowledge of modern community safety management. They do not master the rules of interaction between police work and residents under market economy conditions, resulting in a lack of overall planning in the work. It is difficult to effectively control and control community policing; some community policemen are accustomed to combating crimes, are not good at crime prevention and services, mobilize people's work, can't listen to people's criticism and suggestions, work methods are blunt and simple, causing people to misunderstand, Affect the development of security precautions. From an objective point of view, first, the functions of management and prevention are not guaranteed. Although the Ministry of Public Security stipulates that the main function of the police station is to manage and prevent it, and stipulate that it is not allowed to issue arrests, fines and fee indicators to the team, and effectively reduce the burden on the team, in fact, the focus of the police station has not been completely transferred. The public security organs successively issued to the police station a number of indicators of arrests, fines and fees. The completion of the indicators directly affected the honor of the unit and the future of the individual, causing many grassroots police stations to treat punishment and combat as hard tasks. Implement the community policing strategy as a soft task. This inevitably produces two kinds of results: one is that the community police will go into the community to work in time, the workload will not be effectively guaranteed, and they will not meet the requirements of integrating into the community, competing with the people, and tapping and utilizing community security resources. Some community residents have not seen a community police in a dozen days, and residents have to make appointments for police. The other is a police station with good prevention and management work. The police can not complete the arrest, fine and fee indicators, and can only enforce law across jurisdictions, otherwise it can only be punished. This has also greatly hampered the enthusiasm of the police for prevention and management. Second, the police are overwhelmed. The Ministry of Public Security stipulates that every police officer is responsible for the jurisdiction of 1,000 households. In fact, the number of residents in charge of the police in the city has reached more than 3,000, and some have reached 6,000, more than five times the regulations, plus the handling of daily security cases and various The service work, the public security patrol work, the workload can be seen. Moreover, there are too many things in the form of community policing. The community policing office is full of rules, duties, obligations, methods, institutions, personnel lists, etc. Some people describe it as "psoriasis" and a book of the community police. This book is thicker than a book. It is necessary to fill in several books and multiple repetitive tasks when accepting a case. In contrast to the main duties of the community police, the community police are a bit "not doing business", and the public security organs at the higher levels have too many "frames" for the community police. Third, the community construction is not perfect. Community building is the basis for security prevention. Most of the communities in developed countries in Europe and America are naturally formed in the process of long-term urbanization. However, the characteristics of community administration in China at present are obvious, and community construction is still in its infancy. The public infrastructure of culture, health, and services in the community is relatively lagging behind. The functional departments of the government lack communication with the public security organs, and there is no effective work force. The resources that community defense can rely on are not very rich. In particular, the community's autonomy and self-management awareness are not strong, and the sense of belonging and identity to the community is low. They are still accustomed to the obedience management and passive behaviors of the economic era, and lack the initiative to participate in community management and construction. This situation has not only increased the difficulty of the police to mobilize the enthusiasm of the public, but also affected the role of the community police. Fourth, the assessment of the work of the community police is not reasonable enough. In practice, the unreasonable assessment of the work of the community police is mainly manifested in the fact that there is a “one size fits all” phenomenon in the assessment. The content of the assessment focuses on the form to ignore the substantive content, resulting in some civilian police not working in peace, assessing for assessment, engaging in formalism, practicing fraud, and deviating. The purpose of the community policing strategy; the investigation and punishment of criminals and cases of cracked cases accounted for a heavier score in the assessment, misleading the police to deviate from the focus of work. The fifth is the deterioration of the law enforcement environment and the enthusiasm of the police. In recent years, the police have been obstructed by the implementation of official duties in accordance with the law, and the incidents of infringement have emerged in an endless stream. The incidents of violating police, disturbing police, assaulting police and maliciously complaining about the police have occurred frequently. However, in dealing with these incidents, they are often not strict enough. The parties are not able to get the punishment they deserve. In addition to the media’s misreporting and misleading, the police have placed the police in a weak position, which has seriously hampered the enthusiasm of the police. The work of the police does not contribute to the phenomenon of passive perfunctory.
Second, the group anti-group governance in name of the real situation Under the new situation, the group defense work has changed from administrative to non-governmental, and the group defense personnel have changed from the original "unit person" to "social person." Although the group defense group has been established in form and is still relatively rich, but in terms of actual operation, it is in a state of paralysis, and there has been a "five difficulties" problem, that is, "the concept is difficult to change, the fundraising is difficult, and personnel are launched. Difficulties, difficult interaction between police and civilians, and prevention of implementation difficulties. Because some leaders and civilian police are accustomed to using the administrative orders formed under the economic conditions of the plan, they are still limited to the traditional old ideas and old routines in organizing the implementation of group defense and group work. They are unwilling or not good at making fine Propaganda and organization of work, so as to eat "closed doors" under the new situation, can not effectively mobilize the enthusiasm, initiative and creativity of the people. In addition, at present, in the city, the daily management funds for group defense are based on the principle of voluntariness. Financial arrangements are adopted. The beneficiary units and individuals have a little point to carry out the convenience of the people to solve the problem. However, due to the strengthening of the legal awareness of the members of the society and the "taxpayer's awareness", they believe that they have already paid taxes, and the state should guarantee the safety of taxpayers. Naturally, there is no need to pay for security work. Therefore, this method is adopted. Raising funds is very difficult. This has led to a chain reaction of “difficulty in conceptual change, difficulty in raising funds, difficulty in launching personnel, difficulty in interacting with police and civilians, and prevention of implementation difficulties”.
Third, the community cadres are basically indifferent to the security issues With the warming of community construction, many government departments have extended their functional tasks to the community. The community can't refuse the tasks assigned by the higher authorities, only try to cope with them, the work tasks are particularly heavy, and they are overloaded for a long time. The survey shows that its annual work, stage work, seasonal work, temporary work, report ledgers, etc. have accumulated more than 100. It takes 2/3 of the time for community cadres to cope with various forms of inspection and evaluation. . At the same time, the cultural level of community cadres is generally not high, and the knowledge structure is single, while the higher levels of the departments are more tasks, requirements, and results, but the education and training of community workers is not enough, subject to cultural level and knowledge structure. Limit, lack of a solid work theory basis and leadership experience, organizational talent, coordination ability, language expression ability and scientific work methods, work hard and no innovation, and increase the difficulty of work. In addition, because other work has special funds, and comprehensive management is not, plus the "one-vote veto system" of comprehensive management is not as rigid as family planning. Therefore, community cadres are of course more willing to do work with subsidies and leadership attention, and basically have no regard for public security issues.
Fourth, community residents have insufficient self-defense awareness, and the awareness of “paying for money to buy peace” is not strong. Community residents’ self-defense awareness is an important part of community security. However, community residents are less self-defense, and the resulting cases account for 40% of the number of cases. Such as theft, scams, scams, motor vehicles, bicycles, and theft caused by the chaos, are caused by the lack of self-defense awareness of community residents. The lack of awareness of self-defense is also reflected in the reporting rate. The investigation found that the reporting rate of general cases of residents did not reach 70%. The case was not reported, and the low reporting rate was mainly due to the high cost of reporting and the low rate of detection. In the investigation, some residents thought that the report should be made with the police to send the transcripts, from a few hours to more than half a day. In one case, several times to the police station, several transcripts, and not a transcript. Can break, the loss can be taken back, or self-confessed bad luck. On the other hand, the general public lacks the awareness of “spending money to buy security”. The concept that security service is a kind of "commodity" has not yet been established. The general public relies too much on the power of the government. It is considered that the maintenance of public security is the responsibility of the public security organs. "There is something to look for in the government and blame the police." However, they did not realize that government agencies only provide the basic public security guarantees to the society and cannot meet the special security needs of the units and citizens. Since the reform and opening up more than 30 years, many people, organizations, experts and scholars have called for the government to transition from the "universal government" to the "limited government", but there is less awareness of the public's dependence on the government. The people still pin their own personal and property safety to the government, and do not want to spend money to increase security.
5. Technical defense is not universal and the layout is unscientific. Many units and people are reluctant to invest more in security. Even if some citizens are willing to pay for their own security, they are also limited to the traditional physical defense of “door-to-door”. It is a person who hires property and security personnel, and conducts civil defenses that are strictly guarded. Most citizens know little about technology prevention, or even do not understand it at all, let alone use technology as a commodity to enhance their lives and property. The public security organs unified the organization and installation of technical defense, and the units and the public were suspicious of fund-raising. Therefore, the promotion of technical defense has great difficulties.
In addition, there are still many problems in the prevention of the problem, the leakage management rate of the floating population is high, and the key population is managed by the location of the permanent residence, which causes the key population of the foreigners to become the object of leakage; the helper does not cooperate, and the difficulty of helping the work Large; the owner of the renter is too frequent to change, unable to contact the owner, and the difficulty of managing the tenant is also a prominent problem in public security prevention.
recommended article
- Bathing department marketing and various charging schemes
- Gala Party Planning Book
- Public satisfaction window creation plan
- School legal education activities guidance program
- Work arrangement for the study of party organization in 2019
- Passenger company propaganda film copy
- Spring Mountaineering Challenge Camp Activity Plan
- Key points of civil affairs work
- Outdoor activity program
- Golf Tournament Awards Easy Process
- 50th Anniversary Celebration Program
- Preschool teacher three-year development plan
popular articles
- Funny quotes
- Mandela’s famous words
- The 90th Anniversary Celebration Plan for the Founding of the School
- Gala Party Planning Book
- 2019 Mid-Autumn Festival event plan
- The latest topic of chatting with girls
- Missing childhood sentences
- 2014 encourages the words of a lost person
- 2012 Kindergarten Teaching Plan
- Blessing Dad’s words
- Lincoln's famous sayings
- a good sentence for the motherland
- English inspirational maxim
- Christmas theme event planning
- Dedicated good words
- Putin's famous sayings
- Boasting words 2019
- a famous saying that overcomes setbacks
- Philosophical words 2019
- Reading activity plan
- Common English sentences
- 2019 Beauty Salon Mid-Autumn Festival Promotion Program
- Sad sentence
- Say goodbye
- 2019 School National Day Program
- MacArthur's famous sayings
- Autumn school slogan
- Trusted quotes
- Beauty contest plan
- Save your boyfriend's words