Ten typical lessons of failure of the joint entrance exam

Ten typical lessons of the failure of the joint entrance examination <br /> Text / Li Guangjun's successful experience is mostly colorful, but the reasons for the failure of the lessons are similar. Some typical and common lessons of the failures of the joint entrance examination are listed. It is also a mirror for the students to reflect on themselves, reminding themselves to remind themselves, reflecting the areas to be improved and improved in the joint examination review.
Lesson 1: Ignore the foundation and be too impetuous.
One-sided emphasis on review efficiency and a short-term pursuit of a large increase in the total score is easy to make students feel upset, pursue short-term behavior, turn this reference book for a while, look at the problem book for a while, do dozens of questions a night is too small... ...in fact, they all lick water and flow on the surface. Reviewing is a subtle process of accumulating and accumulating, and the improvement of achievements and the formation of capabilities are not a jump. Measuring the level of review is not based on how many books are read. It is better to break the one finger than to break one finger. As long as you master the "truth", it is better to do one less than the general to do ten questions.
Lesson 2: Lack of a constant, clear, and powerful goal of the joint entrance exam.
"I want to go to college" and "I want to be admitted to a prestigious university" is just a generalized fuzzy general entrance exam goal. It is not very stimulating to the potential of subconscious learning. In the senior review, it takes a long time. Quantitative, clear, clear, and specific joint test objectives to pull the self-subconscious to work hard to overcome the difficulties in learning. Establish a strong goal of the joint exam.
Lesson 3: The progress of the main line review has not kept up with the teacher's review strategy.
In the general review of the third year of high school, it is not uncommon to completely open the teacher's review arrangement and independently carry out his own review plan, which is the easiest way to take a detour and enter the wrong path. Even the self-study ability and strong thinking of the solid and comprehensive joint examination champions have repeatedly told the students with their own lessons: their review plan must obey the teacher's plan, don't open the teacher and do their own. set.
Lesson 4: Eyes are low, and they are not willing to personally organize, self-induct, and self-organize the review content of each subject.
Many students have always used the reference materials to systematically organize the review content as an excuse. They are not willing to do solid and detailed review content systematically.
"There is a glimpse of the end of the paper. You must know that this must be done." Self-organized systematic knowledge notes are the crystallization of their own brain thinking, deep in the deep brain, and the brain neuron memory system hooks into a net, the subconscious mind has a sensible "friendly" familiarity, just to see the reference book The content compiled by others on behalf of the labor can be compared with it.
Lesson 5: Failure to do a timely summary of feedback on review information.
The wrong information, such as wrong questions, questions, focus, omissions, and omissions in the review are all valuable points for the “mineral source. Self-remediation and intensive review for the wrong source information can use time and energy on the cutting edge to prevent Doing too much useless work.
Lesson 6: Not good at formulating scientific plans.
Improper timing, lack of small plans, self-review of the East One Shantou Xiyi hammer, the sky casts the net, there is no stage review goal. Or the self-discipline is too tight, lack of flexibility and mobility, which is the cause of the failure of the small plan. Followed by the teacher is "big pot", his own small plan is "small spoon to feed", "big pot" to eat, "small kitchen" to feed. Formulating a small plan with time flexibility is a practical consideration for every candidate.
Lesson 7: There is no good habit of developing a self-regulating daily self-adjustment, optimism, and upward positive learning mentality.
Scientists have done such an experiment: put microelectrodes on specific parts of the actor's brain, and then ask the actors to perform various movie plots according to different content. When they performed episodes related to gray, listlessness, negative, frustration, and anger, the experimental monitor showed that the enkephalin content decreased, and when the plot entered the content of joy, health, happiness, joy, self-confidence, and love. The content of enkephalin also increased. Enkephalin is a natural pleasure agent that regulates the learning mindset. Forming a positive and positive attitude towards positive learning helps the brain to secrete enkephalin.
Lesson 8: Diversified energy, unable to focus on learning matters for a long time.

The energy of the students is like a light source. When the light source is illuminated too wide, the light is scattered and the brightness is dim. Only by focusing the light into a beam can it increase brightness and penetrate darkness. The students put all their energy into the study like a laser, and they can drill through any "bottlenecks" that hinder the improvement of their scores in various subjects, and successfully complete the review and upgrade of the weak department.
Lesson 9: Self-limitation, lack of spiritual stimulation around the mind.

The three-minute heat is a common problem that students often make in their review. Every day, they should use their self-imagining, self-suggestion, self-talk, self-reflection, self-motivation, self-motivation and other methods to break through the psychological limit of learning and rejuvenate the soul. The potential to make yourself in a state of self-confidence, such as the passion of water and passion. Subconscious learning ability can not be imagined, even if it is usually a little bit of stimulation, you can quickly optimize your learning state.
Lesson 10: Ignore the law of objective increase in the review of various subjects.
The improvement of grades is also regular. For example, the memory knowledge of each subject is sorted into a network, the summary of the classification problem solving, the review of the liberal arts focus on knowledge, the review of the lateral thinking of science review... follow the law of increasing the scores of various subjects To review hard work is to find the key to the door to success.