Financial work summary 3

The relationship between social investment and financing institutions and enterprises is the relationship between shareholders, investors and enterprises. The most important aspect in this regard is to improve the operating rules of the securities stock market. At the same time as cultivating and standardizing social investment and financing institutions, we should speed up the improvement of relevant rules of the securities stock market, especially accounting and auditing rules. Through the development of social investment and financing institutions, institutional investors have become the mainstay of the securities stock market, thus promoting the market to regulate; on the other hand, through the regulation of the securities stock market, the relationship between social investment and financing institutions and listed companies It tends to standardize and lays the foundation for the establishment of a modern enterprise system. ?

Social investment and financing institutions are the relationship of market competition. The most important thing in this regard is to improve the relevant rules of entry, operation and withdrawal to prevent unfair competition. ?

In recent years, with the increase of stock market risks, various forms of investment funds have developed rapidly with the development of high-tech industries. This is also an objective trend in the development of investment and financing activities under the current ownership of property. In this regard, we should actively guide and standardize it so that it can be spontaneously and consciously as soon as possible, and closely integrate this process with the activities of perfecting the rules and order of the socialist market economy and promote each other. Accelerating the development of social investment and financing institutions and accelerating the development of the securities stock market will lay the basic structure for the new investment and financing system and will become the most effective institutional basis for launching private investment.

CCTV's focus interview column reported on November 10, 1999 that the Siping Municipal Government of Jilin Province, in order to support the city's major taxpayer and key enterprise, Siping Cigarette Factory, convened a meeting of responsible persons of all counties and districts, and reached a sales meeting at the meeting. The guiding tasks of the Jiji cigarettes produced by the tobacco factory are assigned to the county by the city, distributed to the town by the county, then distributed to the village by the town, and finally distributed to the head of the people. The money is directly deducted from the wages, and no wages are paid. The farmers mobilized them to pay for the cigarettes. The “Yoshiyan phenomenon” in Siping City has caused us to think about the normative necessity of government economic behavior in the socialist market economy.

Regulating the government's economic behavior under the conditions of a socialist market economy is a requirement for realizing the "market + government" regulation of the modern market economy. The development of the market economy has gone through two stages. One is the free market economy. The market plays a full and full role in resource allocation. One is the modern market economy, which is what we call the market economy. The modern market economy, in terms of its operation or regulation, is a mixed market of “market + government”. On the one hand, the market is the basis of resource allocation, and on the other hand, there is government regulation and intervention. This means that in the modern market economy, the government must “do something and do something”. The government can't "do something", then it will change into the early free market economy. The development of the market economy in the western countries has already proved many defects of the free market economy. They have long abandoned the free market economy and the socialist market economy we want to establish. It is a modern market economy. Of course, we cannot take the old road of Western market economy countries. The government can't "do something wrong", and we will go back to China's original planning economy. We have already exhausted the economic hardship of planning, and changing the economy of the painting to the socialist market economy is the goal of China’s economic system reform. We have made a lot of efforts and achieved great results, and we must never return to the plan. Going in the economy. Since the Government must "do something and do something" in the modern market economy, it must make a reasonable definition of what needs to be "doing something" and what must be "doing something wrong". There are further countermeasures for the problem of "there must be a reasonable standardization of the government's economic behavior in the socialist market economy to ensure the normal operation and healthy development of the socialist market economy."

Regulating the government's economic behavior under the conditions of a socialist market economy is a requirement for making up for the government shortage and overcoming the failure of government behavior in China's transition period. China's transition from a planned economy to a market economy still retains a large amount of inertia of the planned economy, and the real market economy has not yet finally formed. At the same time, due to the low level of personnel and the level of legal norms have not yet met the requirements, there is a shortage of government at the same time as the market is short. The market system is incomplete, the market rules are not perfect, the market information is not smooth, and the market signal distortion is the main performance of the market shortage. The government shortage is mainly reflected in: the government's behavior is not standardized; the government and enterprises are not divided; the government has a lot of management The government has not yet learned the economics of the market economy. The Siping Municipal Government in the “Yiyan Phenomenon” is a manifestation of the government shortage. The market shortage depends on the government to make up for it, and the government shortage depends on the standardization of government behavior to overcome and eliminate. If the government's behavior is not standardized and the government itself is in short supply, it will not only eliminate the market shortage, but also make the government shortage and the market shortage vicious circle, which will bring great difficulties and obstacles to the national economic construction. To overcome and eliminate the government shortage in the transition period and the failure of government behavior and promote the healthy development of the socialist market economy, it is necessary to regulate the government behavior in the socialist market economy, especially to regulate the government's economic behavior.

Regulating the government's economic behavior under the conditions of a socialist market economy is also a requirement for advancing and deepening the reform of state-owned enterprises in China. The property rights of state-owned enterprises in China are both clear and vague. It is clear that the property rights of state-owned enterprises are defined by the current law as state-owned; it is vague because the state cannot clearly define the various capabilities of property rights. This property relationship is not only manifested in the extreme abstraction of the ultimate ownership of property, but also in the ambiguity of legal ownership, the so-called "rights shortage." If we want to develop a socialist market economy and make enterprises become real market players, we must eliminate this shortage of property rights and establish a modern enterprise system with clear property rights as the direction for the reform of state-owned enterprises in China. In the clear property rights system, asset ownership and legal person property rights are separated. As one of the funders, the state has ownership of assets, enjoys the benefits of assets, participates in major decisions, and chooses managers' rights, but cannot directly interfere with the business activities of legal entities. Therefore, one of the keys to establishing a modern enterprise system is to regulate the government's economic behavior and prevent the government from directly intervening in the state-owned enterprises' business activities. In other words, to promote and deepen the reform of state-owned enterprises in China and to clarify the relationship between property rights, we must reasonably regulate the economic behavior of the government in the socialist market economy.

Under the conditions of socialist market economy, the government's economic behavior is mainly aimed at achieving the requirements of efficiency, fairness, sustainable development and common prosperity. The scope of the government's economic behavior or the content involved must also be regulated around this main goal. Generally speaking, the requirements of efficiency, fairness and development span the gap between development and time and the country boundary. It is the common goal pursued by the government's economic behavior in different national conditions under different national conditions. China has chosen the socialist market economy in order to improve the efficiency of resource allocation. The government's economic behavior in the socialist market economy is of course also for higher efficiency. Taking into account efficiency and fairness is the essential requirement of socialism. Efficiency improvement should be manifested through economic development and sustainable development. Fairness should also be achieved through sustainable socio-economic development, while efficiency, equity and sustainable development are all about achieving common prosperity. Therefore, the requirements for achieving efficiency, fairness, sustainable development and common prosperity can be the goal of government economic behavior in the socialist market economy. Regardless of whether the behavior of the Siping Municipal Government in the Jiyan phenomenon is conducive to efficiency improvement and sustainable development, it is at least unfair and not conducive to the realization of the goal of common prosperity. Equity includes fairness of opportunity and fairness of results. Fairness of opportunity means that the rules of competition are the same, just like a fair sporting event. The municipal government of Siping has sold the cigarettes for the Siping tobacco factory by means of decentralization, limited time retrieval, distribution to the head of the people, and direct deduction of money from the wages.

The relationship between social investment and financing institutions and enterprises is the relationship between shareholders, investors and enterprises. The most important aspect in this regard is to improve the operating rules of the securities stock market. At the same time as cultivating and standardizing social investment and financing institutions, we should speed up the improvement of relevant rules of the securities stock market, especially accounting and auditing rules. Through the development of social investment and financing institutions, institutional investors have become the mainstay of the securities stock market, thus promoting the market to regulate; on the other hand, through the regulation of the securities stock market, the relationship between social investment and financing institutions and listed companies It tends to standardize and lays the foundation for the establishment of a modern enterprise system. ?

Social investment and financing institutions are the relationship of market competition. The most important thing in this regard is to improve the relevant rules of entry, operation and withdrawal to prevent unfair competition. ?

In recent years, with the increase of stock market risks, various forms of investment funds have developed rapidly with the development of high-tech industries. This is also an objective trend in the development of investment and financing activities under the current ownership of property. In this regard, we should actively guide and standardize it so that it can be spontaneously and consciously as soon as possible, and closely integrate this process with the activities of perfecting the rules and order of the socialist market economy and promote each other. Accelerating the development of social investment and financing institutions and accelerating the development of the securities stock market will lay the basic structure for the new investment and financing system and will become the most effective institutional basis for launching private investment.

CCTV's focus interview column reported on November 10, 1999 that the Siping Municipal Government of Jilin Province, in order to support the city's major taxpayer and key enterprise, Siping Cigarette Factory, convened a meeting of responsible persons of all counties and districts, and reached a sales meeting at the meeting. The guiding tasks of the Jiji cigarettes produced by the tobacco factory are assigned to the county by the city, distributed to the town by the county, then distributed to the village by the town, and finally distributed to the head of the people. The money is directly deducted from the wages, and no wages are paid. The farmers mobilized them to pay for the cigarettes. The “Yoshiyan phenomenon” in Siping City has caused us to think about the normative necessity of government economic behavior in the socialist market economy.

Regulating the government's economic behavior under the conditions of a socialist market economy is a requirement for realizing the "market + government" regulation of the modern market economy. The development of the market economy has gone through two stages. One is the free market economy. The market plays a full and full role in resource allocation. One is the modern market economy, which is what we call the market economy. The modern market economy, in terms of its operation or regulation, is a mixed market of “market + government”. On the one hand, the market is the basis of resource allocation, and on the other hand, there is government regulation and intervention. This means that in the modern market economy, the government must “do something and do something”. The government can't "do something", then it will change into the early free market economy. The development of the market economy in the western countries has already proved many defects of the free market economy. They have long abandoned the free market economy and the socialist market economy we want to establish. It is a modern market economy. Of course, we cannot take the old road of Western market economy countries. The government can't "do something wrong", and we will go back to China's original planning economy. We have already exhausted the economic hardship of planning, and changing the economy of the painting to the socialist market economy is the goal of China’s economic system reform. We have made a lot of efforts and achieved great results, and we must never return to the plan. Going in the economy. Since the Government must "do something and do something" in the modern market economy, it must make a reasonable definition of what needs to be "doing something" and what must be "doing something wrong". There are further countermeasures for the problem of "there must be a reasonable standardization of the government's economic behavior in the socialist market economy to ensure the normal operation and healthy development of the socialist market economy."

Regulating the government's economic behavior under the conditions of a socialist market economy is a requirement for making up for the government shortage and overcoming the failure of government behavior in China's transition period. China's transition from a planned economy to a market economy still retains a large amount of inertia of the planned economy, and the real market economy has not yet finally formed. At the same time, due to the low level of personnel and the level of legal norms have not yet met the requirements, there is a shortage of government at the same time as the market is short. The market system is incomplete, the market rules are not perfect, the market information is not smooth, and the market signal distortion is the main performance of the market shortage. The government shortage is mainly reflected in: the government's behavior is not standardized; the government and enterprises are not divided; the government has a lot of management The government has not yet learned the economics of the market economy. The Siping Municipal Government in the “Yiyan Phenomenon” is a manifestation of the government shortage. The market shortage depends on the government to make up for it, and the government shortage depends on the standardization of government behavior to overcome and eliminate. If the government's behavior is not standardized and the government itself is in short supply, it will not only eliminate the market shortage, but also make the government shortage and the market shortage vicious circle, which will bring great difficulties and obstacles to the national economic construction. To overcome and eliminate the government shortage in the transition period and the failure of government behavior and promote the healthy development of the socialist market economy, it is necessary to regulate the government behavior in the socialist market economy, especially to regulate the government's economic behavior.

Regulating the government's economic behavior under the conditions of a socialist market economy is also a requirement for advancing and deepening the reform of state-owned enterprises in China. The property rights of state-owned enterprises in China are both clear and vague. It is clear that the property rights of state-owned enterprises are defined by the current law as state-owned; it is vague because the state cannot clearly define the various capabilities of property rights. This property relationship is not only manifested in the extreme abstraction of the ultimate ownership of property, but also in the ambiguity of legal ownership, the so-called "rights shortage." If we want to develop a socialist market economy and make enterprises become real market players, we must eliminate this shortage of property rights and establish a modern enterprise system with clear property rights as the direction for the reform of state-owned enterprises in China. In the clear property rights system, asset ownership and legal person property rights are separated. As one of the funders, the state has ownership of assets, enjoys the benefits of assets, participates in major decisions, and chooses managers' rights, but cannot directly interfere with the business activities of legal entities. Therefore, one of the keys to establishing a modern enterprise system is to regulate the government's economic behavior and prevent the government from directly intervening in the state-owned enterprises' business activities. In other words, to promote and deepen the reform of state-owned enterprises in China and to clarify the relationship between property rights, we must reasonably regulate the economic behavior of the government in the socialist market economy.

Under the conditions of socialist market economy, the government's economic behavior is mainly aimed at achieving the requirements of efficiency, fairness, sustainable development and common prosperity. The scope of the government's economic behavior or the content involved must also be regulated around this main goal. Generally speaking, the requirements of efficiency, fairness and development span the gap between development and time and the country boundary. It is the common goal pursued by the government's economic behavior in different national conditions under different national conditions. China has chosen the socialist market economy in order to improve the efficiency of resource allocation. Government economic behavior in the socialist market economy, of course,

[1] [2] [3] Next