Secretarial knowledge > interview skills

Practical interview: "We received an anonymous call..."

In the year of the graduation of Southern Network News, I joined the mighty tide of civil service examinations in the central authorities of Beijing and the State Council. After several days of light-fighting night battles, I finally passed the written test stage and obtained the qualification for interviewing a certain ministry. But this is only the first step in the long march of the Long March. There are still many gullies waiting for me. As everyone knows, there are three types of “difficult households” who are looking for work in Beijing every year, namely female students, students without Beijing hukou, and students from Beijing foreign schools. And my condition is "three in one", which is a difficult household in a difficult household. What's more, the finalists in the interviews were all top students in colleges and universities, and the final admission was only one. Although I know that the road to job hunting is difficult, I still seriously prepare for professional knowledge and report on the belief that "a few hard times in life" and set foot on the train to Beijing. Since the ministry I applied for was the public security inspection system, when I entered the examination hall, I saw more than a dozen examiners who were dressed in uniforms and majesty, but they shocked the earthquake. The next step is a routine self-introduction, followed by a professional question, and the scene seems to be difficult to deal with. At this moment, the examiner suddenly said with a serious look: "We received an anonymous phone call yesterday, which was sent by your classmates. It is reported that your teacher-student relationship in the school has always been bad. The title of the student cadre and the finalist interview are also based on I got it by improper means. How do you explain this?" The examiners' eyes all gathered on my face. I was shocked first, then immediately calmly reflected on myself. It should be said that in the school, not only isn’t it as ridiculous as the classmates said, but it is also a recognized enthusiasm. My squad leader and the president of the student union are elected by everyone, and there is nothing wrong with it. During my time at school, I have been working hard for my classmates, and my relationship with my classmates is very harmonious. Therefore, no one should call such a call. Thinking of this, I said to the examiner very confidently: "I have always been doing things in a down-to-earth manner, being honest, not hurting others, and my classmates know me very well. The reason why I can come here for an interview is me. It is impossible to make a fake test based on my own real talents. I believe that no classmates will call such a call." After listening to this, the examiner is still aggressive: "But there is such a call to us." How do you explain?" I replied: "I am not afraid of shadows. If there is such a phone call, the examiner present can go to my school to investigate. I believe my teacher and classmates will give me a fair evaluation." At this time, the examiner and other examiners loosened their tight faces and revealed a smiling smile. It turned out that this phone is fictitious, and it is specifically to examine my understanding of myself and the reaction to my own attack. Obviously, my performance makes them satisfied. At the end of everything, suddenly an examiner asked: "Since you have applied for our department, do you know the names of our ministers?" This can be difficult for me. I know the current one. I can think of it in the first session. But I can’t quite understand the ministers in the middle, and the names of ministers in the mind are stirring up. How to do? It is better to recruit from it than to edit it. I am embarrassed but frankly said: "I do know that it is not complete, good comrades do not swear, ask the examiner to judge!" My words gave the examiners amused. In the end, I received a letter of acceptance as I wished. After getting familiar with the people in the ministry, they told me that at the beginning, my "three-in-one" was the most difficult. However, other students who participated in the interview either reacted strongly to the anonymous call, and some even shed tears, claiming that it was because A certain student who has offended has deliberately framed him; or when he answered the last question, he wrote the name of the minister and made a crown. All kinds of unsatisfactory performances do not meet the basic requirements of honesty and calmness of the public prosecution law.

recommended article

popular articles