Teaching evaluation implementation plan

Teaching work is an important part of school work, and it is the basic way to cultivate talents and achieve educational goals. It has the most comprehensive impact on the development of students and has the greatest impact on the quality of school education. It is one of the important foundations for the work of higher authorities and social evaluation schools. The teacher evaluation is aimed at promoting the comprehensive improvement and improvement of the school teaching work, making the school teaching management institutionalized, standardized and scientific, and promoting the development of teaching reform. At the same time, it is also to objectively quantitatively evaluate the teachers' fair teaching work, to create a competitive atmosphere, mobilize the enthusiasm of teachers to participate in teaching, and build a team of high-quality teachers who can undertake the task of quality education, according to the compulsory education stage in the harbor area. Evaluate the archives spirit of the implementation plan and combine this with the actual situation of the school.

First, the guiding ideology

To fully implement the Party's educational policy, comprehensively implement quality education, and promote and deepen curriculum reform; to discover, study, and solve problems arising from the implementation of new curriculum in schools and teachers; to improve teaching management and improve teaching quality The ultimate goal is to run a satisfactory education for the people.

Second, the principle of evaluation:

1. The principle of directionality. Under the guidance of the party's educational policy, quality education, and innovative education theory, it is necessary to improve the teaching work and promote the in-depth reform of education, in line with the education and teaching objectives of talents and qualified personnel for the country. The evaluation criteria are determined according to the requirements of the teaching plan and the syllabus to ensure the correct direction of the assessment.

2. Scientific principles. The evaluation of teachers' teaching must be based on science. It must have sufficient scientific basis, scientific attitude and scientific methods. It should follow the teaching principles and rules according to the "Standards for Teaching Evaluation of Teachers in Compulsory Education in Hebei Province" and follow the basic requirements of the school. To implement and grasp the teaching evaluation.

3. The principle of objectivity. Through the teacher self-evaluation, student and parent evaluation and evaluation team evaluation, the teacher will be given an objective and fair evaluation. The school evaluation should refer to the “Standards for School Teaching Assessment in the 2010-2010 School Year of the Compulsory Education Stage in the Harbour Area” and the “County Teaching in the Compulsory Education Stage of Hebei Province”. The evaluation criteria are realistic and the corresponding indicators and grades are evaluated.

Third, the assessment preparation work

Set up an assessment team

Team leader: An Zhenmei

Deputy leader: Zhang Li Wang Yanqi

Member: Yang Dongmei Wang Jing Wang Yajun Zhang Xujiang Wang Yan Hu Hailing Zhang Jinyan Jiang Yinhua

Study "Standards for Teaching Evaluation of Teachers in Compulsory Education in Hebei Province", "Standards for School Teaching Evaluation in the 2010-2010 School Year of Compulsory Education in the Harbour Area", and "Evaluation Criteria for County Teaching in the Stage of Compulsory Education in Hebei Province".

Fourth, the evaluation method and program

Teacher evaluation

1. Teacher self-evaluation

The teacher conducts a self-level assessment according to the "Standards for Teaching Evaluation of Teachers in Compulsory Education in Hebei Province". Complete the self-assessment and summary of the “2010-2010 Teacher Assessment Report for the Compulsory Education Phase in the Harbour Area”. The self-assessment results are recorded in the “Teacher Assessment” total score of 10%.

2. Student and parent evaluation

The evaluation shall be conducted by the school through the unified evaluation of the “Students' Assessment of Students and Parents in the 2010-2010 Academic Year of the Compulsory Education Stage in the Harbour Area”. The number of students and parents participating in the evaluation is not less than 50% and 20% of the total number of students in the class. When the evaluation form is issued, the teacher's avoidance method is adopted to achieve the authenticity of the evaluation. The feedback results of the “Scoring Form” are filled in the teacher self-assessment report, and the score sheet is archived in time. The evaluation results are each credited to the “Teacher Assessment” by 10%.

3. Evaluation of the school evaluation team

The evaluation team members evaluate the teachers according to the evaluation criteria and fill in the teacher self-assessment report. The evaluation results are recorded in the “Teacher Assessment” total score of 70%.

4. The results of the comprehensive evaluation

The school evaluation team shall calculate the scores of the above four evaluations according to the corresponding weights, determine the final evaluation score of each teacher, and determine the corresponding level. Fill out the “Summary of Teachers' Teaching Assessment for the 2010-2010 Academic Year in the Compulsory Education Phase of the Harbour Area” and complete the “List of Teachers' Teaching Assessment for the 2010-2010 Academic Year in the Compulsory Education Phase of the Harbour Area”.

Teacher evaluation results are divided into four levels: excellent, good, average, and poor. The specific scores are: excellent --- 90 points or more; good --- 89 to 70 points; general --- 69 to 40 points; worse --- 39 points or less.

The form information generated in the above evaluation process must be deposited in the teacher semester or the performance appraisal file of the current year as an important basis for teacher appointment and professional development assessment.

School teaching evaluation

1. School self-evaluation

The school self-assessed according to the “Standards for School Teaching Assessment in the 2010-2010 School Year of Compulsory Education in the Harbour Area”, and wrote the “Report on the Teaching Evaluation of Schools in the Compulsory Education Stage in the Harbour Area”, and filled out the “Evaluation of School Teaching in the 2010-2010 School Year in the Compulsory Education Stage of the Harbour Area”. report".

2. District-level final evaluation

The assessment is organized by the district assessment team in accordance with provincial assessment criteria. Through classroom observation, access to materials, teachers and student interviews, the school comprehensively evaluates the completion of important indicators such as teaching management, teacher professional development, and school teaching quality, and evaluates the classroom teaching of teachers of different levels and different levels. Finally, the school Make a comprehensive evaluation. The program is:

First, determine the sampling assessment teacher. According to the "Crystal District Compulsory Education Stage 2010-2010 Teacher Education Assessment List", randomly select 2-3 teachers per school, language, mathematics, English, morality, science, information, synthesis, school-based, music, art, physical education.

Second, classroom observation. Listen to the normal class of the teacher who was drawn, and the teachers of the subject teaching and research group participated in the lecture.

Third, participate in the disciplinary teaching and research activities of the teachers, after-school interviews and dialogues.

Fourth, access to information.

Fifth, individual interviews with students.

Sixth, evaluation feedback.

Seventh, the results are reported.

The school will regard this teaching evaluation as a review of teaching work, and do a good job in school evaluation, find the focus of the work, clarify the results, find the gap, and lay the foundation for the next step.