[Boutique] College Student Debate Competition Planning Book

This article directory 1 college debates planning book 2 college students debate game planning book 3 college students debate game planning book 1: college students debate game planning book

In order to showcase the new generation of college students, especially the students of the electric power engineering department, they are full of vigor and courage to show their self. They provide a platform for students to communicate and exercise, enrich the campus cultural life, develop students' ideas, and cultivate and explore talents. In the spirit of fair competition and striving for the first, the Department of Power Engineering held the college debates with the aim of “focusing on social hotspots, demanding progress, exercising eloquence, and developing self”. Organizational Unit

Organizer: Department of Electrical Engineering Student Union

Executive unit: Department of Electrical Engineering, Student Affairs Center, Learning Department, Organization Department, Discipline Inspection Department

Activity content: College debate

Theme of the event: Focus on social hotspots, pursue progress, exercise eloquence, develop self, and show the style of college students with a debate on positive and progressive debates.

Purpose of the event: The debate contest is mainly to enrich the students' after-school life, to activate the after-school atmosphere, to develop ideas, to reflect the energetic and positive spirit of the students, to cultivate and explore the talents of the debate, and to improve the spirit of “fair competition and strive for the first”. Student reading, writing, audiovisual, presentation and other abilities, team organization and solidarity

Significance of the event: Debate is an activity that can improve the ability to think, enrich after-school knowledge, cultivate team spirit, and exercise thinking expression. Carrying out this activity will enable students to better integrate into university life, enhance self-confidence in activities, and foster innovation and teamwork. Therefore, I hope that through this competition, I will enrich my classmates' after-school life, improve their ability to think and develop, and cultivate an innovative spirit, so that students can interact with each other.

Activity object: All students of the Electric Power Engineering Department Activity time: March 1, 2019 Event location: Library lecture hall

Participation method: four classes per class for the preliminary competition, and then the preliminaries, semi-finals, finals

Argument: Each team consists of 4 people. Ask the defender to have clear articulation, quick thinking, well prepared before the game, the appearance of the instrument is correct, the articulation is clear, cheerful and generous

Competition rules and procedures: 1. Composition

Each debate team has four debates, which are divided into one to four debates in order. One argument is responsible for the argumentation and the summary of the argument; the second and third arguments are responsible for the argument; the fourth argument is responsible for the summary.

2. Process self introduction

First, the self-introduction is carried out by the square, and then the self-introduction is carried out by the opposing party for one minute each time.

Opening an argument

First, the arguments are debated by the defending party, and then the opposing party argues for one argument. The time is two minutes.

One-on-one attack

The attack consists of four phases. First of all, the second party arbitrarily chooses the anti-party two arguments or the three arguments to conduct the attack. After that, the anti-party arguments choose the square two arguments or the three arguments to attack. After the completion, the above steps are repeated by the third party and the third party. .

After the opponent is selected, the other party will ask questions and the other party will answer. The attacker can only ask questions, each question is up to 15 seconds; the opponent can only answer, each answer up to 25 seconds. Each round of attack is limited to 1 minute and 30 seconds.

In each stage of the attack, both sides of the attack and defense cannot change in the middle, and both the offensive and defensive positions stand. After the attacker has finished asking questions, the attacker can end the attack ahead of time.

Attack summary

The squad is summed up by the defending party, and then the counter-party arguing for a summary of the argument, one minute each.

Free debate

The right side begins to freely debate. The two sides make a speech at a time. It is impossible for the same party to speak continuously, and each party is timed for 5 minutes. After one party arrives, the four debaters who have not arrived by time can speak freely until the time is exhausted, or the party who has not arrived by time can give up the time to end the free debate.

Summary of the words

First, the anti-party four arguments summed up the remarks, and then the Zhengfang four arguments, each time 3 points.

3, control

The debater should strictly abide by the time limit of the debate. Argument on the debate and free debate Debates At the end of 30 seconds, when the attack is 15 seconds left, the timekeeper will remind; time is up. If the score exceeds 5 seconds, the penalty will be awarded. According to the record, the score is 2, 5 or 10 points according to the severity.

4, matters needing attention

The contestants should be neatly dressed and behave in a civilized manner.

Attention should be paid to the language during the competition, and personal attacks are prohibited. If there is obvious embarrassment or insult, the qualification of the relevant team will be cancelled.

The four debaters in the free debate stage should participate together.

No disputes may occur during the competition. Relevant opinions and problems arising in the competition shall be presented to the moderator at intervals in each link.

Appraisal method: According to the performance of the player, the best debater, the most valuable debater, the first prize of the group, the second prize of the group, and the best organization award.

Reviewer: A member of the Student Union of the Department of Electrical Engineering.

Part 2: College Student Debate Game Plan

Planning Department: Department of Electronic Information

Organizer: Gan Chen Huang Xiujuan staff distribution

Moderator: Yang Lei Zhu Haitao Propaganda Group: Each class life committee logistics group: each class life committee

Referee: Chang Shuai Cheng Tingluo examines Liu Bo Zhou Hongbo Photographer: Wang Hai

Team mode: 09, 1, 9, 2, 09, 3, 09 communication for a team, 09 electronics, 09 animation team, a team of four players. Precautions

1. The debaters in the debates cannot be impersonated

2. All responsible persons and contestants must be present in the first 10 minutes.

3. During the debate, the players must follow the conductor's command.

4. There must be no uncivilized phenomenon in the debates and exhibitions, and no littering, and the classes are not allowed to speak loudly.

1. Theme: The pros and cons of college students falling in love

2, the main purpose: in the first game of friendship, the second concept fully demonstrates the style of contemporary college students

3. The representatives of each team are in place and divided into square and opposite parties. The audience members of each class are seated in the referee. 4. The planner announces the start of the competition and the host plays according to the rules.

5, from the side of the No. 1 statement of their own views, and then by the anti-party No. 1 statement

6. Conduct a debate, ask each team to ask questions and ask the player to answer. 7. Free debate

8. The debate between the two sides is debated by the 4th debater, and the referee announces the result of the competition.

Excellent Award, a positive award

The teams leave the site in order. The purpose is to provide a platform for the members of the association to communicate and exercise. To demonstrate the ability of a new generation of college students, especially members of our marketing association, to show their energetic and courageous self-expression, enrich the cultural life of the community and activate the corporate atmosphere. Develop marketing ideas. Cultivate talents for excavation and debate, in the spirit of "fair competition, strive for the first", with the purpose of "focusing on social hotspots, demanding progress, exercising eloquence, and developing self", disseminating the spirit of science and showing the style of students. Third, the composition of the debater: the new member of the Marketing Association IV. Participants: All members of the Marketing Association V. Event time:

From November 22 to December 15, 2007, event location:

Seven, the theme of the debate:

All-rounders are more adaptable to social competition, and professionals are more adaptable to social competition. Eight, preparations before the game:

1. Determine the participating teams and members 2. Apply for the event venue

3. Broadcasting and publicity leaflets 4. Association website promotion.

5. Invite guest Yang Ting to review and comment, Q group publicity 6. Develop and print 20 copies of the score sheet 7. Produce and print the president's lines 8. Prepare the certificate and carbon pen 9. Make and prepare a red card, a yellow card 10. Prepare camera

11. Prepare three electronic watches 12. Specific personnel arrangements: Chairman: Wang Fan Review: Chronographer: Receptionist:

Photo: Cha Wei

Score statistics: Huashan debate record: Liu Wei maintains order: Awards:

Clearing the venue after the game: IX, debate program

1, the opening white

The chairman announced the official start of the competition and introduced the review

The chairman invited the two parties to enter the competition and introduce the team and their positions.

The chairman read the rules of the game 2 and started the competition.

5, review comments after the debate, and score statisticians to score statistics

7. The chairman announces the scores of the two parties in the competition and the scores of the debaters. At the same time, the score statistician fills in the winners according to the scores. 8. Awards and photographs. 9. The chairman announces the successful conclusion of the debate. 10. Debating the program 1.

The pros and the two sides defended one after another, the third party made a speech, the other side, and the other side argued.

A. The second party arbitrarily chooses the anti-party two-argument or the three-defense one-on-one argument B. The anti-party second argument chooses the counter-two argument or the three arguments to conduct one-on-one arguments. C. The square-side argument chooses the counter-two arguments or the three arguments. One-on-one defense, one-side defense, three-defense, two-side defense, three-defense, one-on-one defense, one-on-one arguing, E, one-side arguing, arbitrage, summary, F, anti-party, arguing, summary, 3, free debate, 4, summary

The Four Sides of the Anti-Party

Eleven, debate details

1, time prompt

During the free debate stage, when the remaining time of each party is 30 seconds, the chronographer will give a red card reminder; when the time is full, the yellow card will be terminated.

When the yellow card is terminated, the speaker must stop speaking, otherwise it will be dealt with illegally. 2, the words

Advocating impromptu submissions, citing the classics of the classics

Argument requires clear logic, conciseness, and arguing

The attack is initiated by the second party, and the positive and negative sides alternate.

The pros and cons of the second and third defenses participated in the debate, and the pros and cons of the defense debated the summary. The defense is arbitrarily designated by the attacking party and is not subject to the number of times. Both sides of the debate must complete the debate alone and must not be replaced in the middle.

Both sides must answer each other's questions positively, and the questions and answers must be clear and concise. Repeated questions and avoidance questions are subject to scoring. You can't arbitrarily destroy the integrity of the other party's defense by asking questions. You can't stop the other party's question by long-term reply, and you can't answer it or don't know what to say. The moderator has the right to terminate a long question or reply. The pros and cons players stand to complete the stage of the debate. The attacking party is considered to have completed the attack of the party, and the players of both sides have made their speech within the time limit.

When the two sides ask questions, they are asked to answer, and they must not evade or ask questions.

Each attack stage is 1 minute and 30 seconds. The attacker must not exceed 10 seconds for each question. Each question is answered no more than 1 minute. When the time is over, the speech is terminated.

After the four-person attacking stage is completed, the first party will first arguing and then the opposing party will make a conviction summary for the team. The time limit is 1 minute. The summary of the tactics of both sides must be directed at the content of the attack stage, and it is strictly forbidden to leave the actual draft of the game. 5. Free debate

The free debate must be repeated between the two teams. First, a member of the pros and cons will speak, and then a member of the opposing party will speak. The two sides will take turns until the time runs out. After one party ends, the other party begins to speak.

In the total time, the order, number and time of the team members’ speeches are correct.

The free debate advocates active confrontation, and deducts points for those who evade more than two times on important issues, and is still entangled in the questions that the other party has clearly answered.

6, the debate

The four parties should make a summary of the overall situation of the debate; from the actual situation, memorize the manuscript prepared in advance, and deduct the appropriate points. 7. The parties in the debate may not read the manuscript prepared in advance, or deduct the appropriate points, but they may present the cited Information such as summaries of books or newspapers.

8. During the game, the debater must not leave the seat, and must not disturb the other party or other debaters of the party.

1. Review, guest composition 2, criteria for judging criteria

Group part

Debating skills: the fluency of the language of the debater, the ability to refute, analyze and adapt, and the persuasive and logical content of the argument: whether the content of the argument is substantial and whether the cited material is appropriate

Demeanor and sense of humor: the performance of each team in the free debate

Overall cooperation: the integrity of the team's argument structure, the tacit understanding between the players and the personal part

A, on

Whether the essay is appropriate, whether the reason is thorough, whether the logic is strong, whether the reference instance is appropriate B, arguing

Whether the question is appropriate, whether the answer is pertinent, whether the refutation is powerful and reasonable, whether the response is alert, and whether the term is appropriate

Thirteen, the award method

There are 1 best debater and 3 outstanding debaters.

Part 3: College Student Debate Game Planning Book

I. Activity Background: Protecting Resources

Second, the purpose of the event:

1, for the secondary school students can fully publicize the personality, show personal talent to provide a platform

2, through this activity to improve the eloquence and communication level of the majority of secondary school students

Third, the event time: the end of December

Fourth, the event location: AP105

Fifth, the host class:

Hosting class: Secretary 12

Co-organized class: none

Sixth, the competition requirements:

Team: Secretary 12, each bedroom

Argument: Each team consists of 4 people. Ask the defender to have clear articulation, quick thinking, and be fully prepared before the game

Chairman's request: the appearance of the instrument is correct, the teeth are clear, cheerful and generous

Seven, the activity process:

Debate qualifier

The debate team winning the qualifier draws the rematch debate the next day.

Rematch:

The debate team winning in the semi-finals draws the semi-final debate on the next day.

Semifinal

The winning team that won in the semi-finals took the final debate on the next day.

finals:

Note: There is a commentator for each site to make an on-site review. The guest reviews are produced by the judges.

Eight, the rules of the game

, game program, time and related requirements

1, the total of 6 minutes

Positive and negative arguments each three minutes

2. Stage of attack:

The second party arguing and the second party replied, the cumulative time of both parties is 1 minute and 30 seconds.

The second party argues, and the second party answers the question. The cumulative time of both parties is 1 minute and 30 seconds.

The third party arguing and the third party replied, the cumulative time of both parties is 1 minute and 30 seconds.

The anti-party debates on the three sides, the third party replies, the cumulative time of both parties is 1 minute and 30 seconds.

Zheng Fang argues to make a summary of the attack, take 1 minute

The anti-party debates the summary of the attack and takes 1 minute.

Note: Each question does not exceed 15 seconds, each response does not exceed 20 seconds. The answering party may not ask the other party in any form. Both sides must answer each other's questions positively, and the questions and answers must be clear and concise. Repeated questions and avoidance questions are subject to penalty points. The summary of the pros and cons of the pros and cons must be directed at the stage of the attack and the content involved, and the draft of the actual situation from the competition must be deducted.

3. The free debate phase is shared for 10 minutes, and each party takes 5 minutes.

4. Summarize the four-minute time when the submission phase is shared. The two sides will sum up the arguments and use two minutes for each party. The opposite party begins.

5, announce the results, review reviews

Judging criteria

The group part is based on the general method of the national college debate, with a total of 300 points.

Scored by debate stage, 200 points

Chen Ci: 30 points

Attack: 40 points

Summary of the attack: 20 points

Free debate: 60 points

Answer the audience question: 20 points

Summary of the statement: 30 points

Comprehensive impression score, 100 points

Language style: 50 points

Group cooperation, on-the-spot response: 50 points per game to judge the best debater, one winning team.

Grading principle

1. Group part:

The examination questions accurately grasp the connotation and extension of the debate, and can understand the positions held at multiple levels and at various angles. The arguments are clear and can effectively deal with and resolve the difficulties.

The understanding and discussion of the debate can be carried out in breadth and advance in depth. The whole debate process is clear and can give people a layer of recursive beauty.

Refuting the question and grasping the other party's key points, the problem is simple and clear; answering the face-to-face question is justified. Focus on confrontation with the title.

In cooperation with the spirit of the team, the team members support each other, and the debates are smooth, the direction is unified, both offensive and defensive, and the speeches are freely debated during the free debate, reflecting the "fluid overall consciousness."

The standard of language and language, the speed of speech, and the fluency of language, is contagious and reflects the beauty of Mandarin.

Respect the opponents in the debates and respect the chairman, judges and audience. Decent manners, showing good moral cultivation. Dare to innovate, be brave in performance, have the unique style of the team, and run through the whole.

The image is neatly dressed and the instrument is generous, reflecting a good demeanor and temperament.

2. Personal part: The impression is given by the judge according to the performance of each debater in the whole game.

The words are fluent, thorough, and decent;

The question is appropriate, the answer is pertinent, the refutation is powerful, the reaction is astute, and the humor is interesting.

Typhoon and arguing.

Winning and losing judgment

1. The judgment of the outcome of each match is determined by the comprehensive assessment of the judges.

2. If the two teams score the same, the jury will vote separately to decide the outcome.

3, the best debater in a single game is only used as a basis for judging individual awards, and has nothing to do with judging each win. The single best debater is judged by the review group and does not set the score standard.

Comments One comment guest per game for on-site reviews.

Nine, awards set

First, the group award

1. Debating the runner-up prize: pending

2, the debate champion prize prize: to be determined

3. Debate season military prizes: to be determined

Second, the individual award 1, the best debater in the contest: the final, the debater to participate in the competition, the highest score of the winners.

Remarks: This debate will award the corresponding awards to the champion team, the Asian army and the quarterly army. The winners of this competition will be awarded the corresponding certificates and material rewards.

appendix

Game notes

First, please ask the student unions, study ministers, and participating team members to read the game instructions carefully and familiarize themselves with the schedule of the competition.

two,

All participating team members and organizers must arrive at the competition site 30 minutes before the start of each match. At the same time, the blackboard decoration of each venue was agreed by the two sides of the game, and it was decorated 30 minutes before the start of the competition, in order to facilitate the overall arrangement of the event and the smooth preparation of each game.

Third, please participate in the various schedules of the competition. In case of special problems, please contact the organizers and the staff of the student union of the student union in time to coordinate the arrangement and ensure the smooth progress of the event.

Fourth, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the competition, please prepare carefully before each game, in order to facilitate the debater to play their best level in the game.

5. During the competition, please do not contact the jury for each team. If you want to express your opinion on the event, please contact the members of the study department.

Sixth, each department can specially organize the students to watch the competitions of the team, and organize and prepare appropriate propaganda tools, slogans, etc., but it must not affect the normal order of the game, do not shout slogans or drink. The Organizing Committee has the right to block and require it to leave the competition site for all actions that affect the normal conduct of the competition.

Team instructions

(1) The preliminary team will be dispatched by each team in each grade and may abstain.

(2) Each team has 4 players and 4 debate players. Each team must design a logo of their own team before the first round.

(3) Participants must first register with each class leader. The class leader will contact the person in charge of the list debate. All participating members should pay attention to the latest notice. After receiving the notice from the organizer, they must reply as soon as possible and participate in the debate training. At each event meeting, the unsuccessful team leader has the right to cancel the qualification of the team. )

(4) The participating teams should abide by the rules of the game and strictly abide by the ethics of the players. It is strictly forbidden to make inappropriate words and deeds. The first violators will give a verbal warning, and the violators will deduct the total score of the group by 5%. The third violators will immediately cancel the qualification of the team.

(5) It is strictly forbidden to impersonate the replacement. Once found, the team will be disqualified immediately.

(6) Before the competition, the team must check in at the venue 10 minutes in advance to prepare for the start of the competition. For example, the team that has not signed in after 10 minutes of the start of the competition will be deemed as an automatic waiver.

(7) During the competition, each team leader is responsible for the work contact with the organizer and all the transactional work of the team. If the contestant has an unexpected situation before the competition, the team leader must inform the organizer two days in advance. If there is any doubt, the contestants can directly find the staff of the study department on the spot. The staff should answer the questions accurately, clearly and patiently. If the answer is incorrect, the person in charge of the learning department will be held accountable. Match

(8) The results of the competition will be announced on the second day of the competition day. If the team has different results for the day, the team leader may ask the person in charge after the game. The organizer must give a true and reasonable explanation.

(9) If the game fails to operate normally due to unforeseen factors such as weather and equipment, the person in charge on the spot will decide whether to continue or suspend within 20 minutes after the start of the competition and announce it within 1 day.

Specific issues:

1. Lottery matters

The first one. Preliminary: When the challenge is confirmed on the day of the month, the teams are drawn by lot to determine the grouping situation and the group number.

Article 2. After the lottery group is determined, the draws of each team will determine the pros and cons of each match.

Article 3. The debate in each game is drawn by the leader of the game.

Article 4. Each team must draw lots on time, and those who arrive late or fail to do so will be dealt with by the lottery. The schedule will be randomly formulated by the organizer.

2. Competition service

Provide the judges and debaters with the necessary services necessary for the competition, such as the corresponding judges, competition chronographers, necessary equipment, and corresponding classrooms, in order to ensure the perfect and smooth performance of the competition.

3, the game program

Announce a debate

Announce the rules of the game

Introduce the participating teams and their positions

Introduce the team members

, introducing rules, reviewing and commenting guests

,Game start

The audience freely ask questions

After the jury scored, the review was retired.

The jury will be present and the judges will comment on the event.

Announce the results of the competition

End of the debate