School teacher assessment rules

Teacher assessment rules

In order to effectively strengthen the construction of the teaching staff of our school, standardize the management of teaching quality, improve the incentive and competition mechanism, and promote the overall improvement of teaching quality, and provide the basis for the award of teaching quality awards and other types of awards, these measures are formulated.

Article 1 The principle of assessment: adhere to the principles of democracy, justice, and objectivity; adhere to the principle of emphasizing performance and stressing practical results; adhere to the principle of combining qualitative and quantitative.

Article 2 Assessment content: The whole process of the teacher's teaching business is assessed, focusing on teaching performance, teaching attitude and teaching level.

Article 3 Basis for assessment: “Standards for Teaching Management of Rugao Normal School in Jiangsu Province”; “Teacher Syllabus Teaching Task Book”; “Implementation Rules for the Issuance of Work Allowances for Rugao Normal Schools in Jiangsu Province”.

Article 4 Assessment methods: grading, classification assessment, quantitative integration, qualitative evaluation, etc.

Teaching management department evaluation

1. The quality of teaching routine work

Is the attitude of performing duties and duties serious, whether the implementation of work discipline is serious, whether the procedures for taking leave are strictly performed, whether there are unreasonable dereliction of duty, absenteeism or frequent lateness, early leave, whether there is a private suspension of classes, the phenomenon of class adjustment, whether the main time and energy are used for work. .

Assessment method: check the relevant assessment records.

Score: Very good 4 points, good 3 points, generally 2 points, worse 2-0 points.

Whether the quality of teaching plans and preparations meets the requirements of the school; whether the requirements, priorities, difficulties, and assignments of the teaching objectives are clear; whether the teaching plans are standardized; whether the writing is neat. Whether to actively participate in the teaching and research activities within the group, the school, whether the number of sessions is up to standard; whether the class is serious; whether the class is effective.

Assessment method: The Academic Affairs Office, the teaching and research group organizes random inspections or comprehensive inspections of teaching progress plans, teaching logs, preparation notes, access to lecture notes, teaching and research group evaluation records, and academic affairs attendance records.

Score: very good 3 points, good 2 points, generally 1 point

Whether the teaching task is good, whether the basic goal of teaching is achieved, whether the class is on time or not; whether the lecture content is correct; whether the classroom structure is reasonable; whether the difficulty is outstanding; whether the teaching method reflects the new spirit of the curriculum reform, whether the teacher-student interaction is emphasized; Artistic; how effective classroom teaching is.

Assessment method: check the teaching task book, check the teaching progress; follow the class; hold the student symposium; check the "class log"

Score: very good 7-6 points, good 5-4 points, generally 3-2 points, worse 1-0 points.

Whether the workload meets the requirements of the school; whether the operation is typical; whether the work done by the students is standardized; whether the correction is correct and timely; whether it is often to the class, and to do a good job for all students.

Assessment method: check student assignments. Check the class log, the Academic Affairs Office, and the spot check

Score: Very good 3 points, good 2 points, usually 1 point.

Is it timely and conscientious to complete the propositions, invigilation, and scoring tasks arranged by the Academic Affairs Office, and whether there is any dereliction of duty in the invigilation; whether the scrutiny is consistent with the standards; whether the comments are serious and timely.

Assessment method: check the test papers; check the invigilation and invigilation records; check the examination papers; hold a student forum; check the academic office duty log

Score: very good 3 points, good 2 points, generally 1 point, worse 1-0 points.

2. 40% of teaching performance

The evaluation of the teaching performance of the teachers who are in the examination course of the cultural courses is mainly based on the difference of the rankings and the difference between the examinations of the mid-term and final exams of the teaching department and the examination results of the higher-level departments, and determine the comprehensive ranking of the progress of the subject in this semester. And give the corresponding assessment points.

The teacher who is a subject of the cultural curriculum examination or skill class shall determine the comprehensive assessment score of the subject according to the qualification rate, compliance rate and excellent rate of the examination results in the scientific period.

Assessment method: check the scores of the examinations of each subject, compare with the original scores at the beginning; the average score, pass rate, pass rate and standard deviation of the mid-term and final exams of the statistical culture period; The Skills Section finalizes the comprehensive ranking according to the Qualification Rate and the Excellent Score Rate of the semester; the statistics of each subject are based on the standard scores. In principle, compare with the teachers in the same grade.

Score:

40 points for the first place; 39 points for the second place; 38 points for the third place; 37 points for the fourth place; 36 points for the fifth place;

35 points in the 6th place; 34 points in the 7th place; 33 points in the 8th place; 32 points in the 9th place; 31 points in the 10th place.

Anyone who actively participates in teaching observation, open class activities or courseware competitions or actively guides students to tutor students to participate in internal or external competitions or publish papers, according to the level of the public class or the results of the counseling competition, the quality of the publication of the student papers Appropriate points. The bonus points are:

5 points at the national level; 4 points at the provincial level; 3 points at the municipal level; 2 points at the county level

Student evaluation

Assessment items: the quality of work in teaching attitudes, preparing lessons, attending classes, homework corrections and coaching, and exams.

Assessment method: All the students of the Academic Affairs Office organize democratic evaluation of the teachers in the subject department.

Score: Multiply the student evaluation percentage score by 20% and convert it into a comprehensive test score.

Teaching and research group evaluation

Assessment projects: preparation, class, homework correction and counseling, examinations and teaching and research activities.

Assessment method: The teaching and research team leader is responsible for organizing and implementing. According to the teaching and research group's work desk account, the usual listening and evaluation class and other teaching and research activities, the subject group evaluation is conducted on the basis of peer evaluation and foundation.

Score: Multiply the teaching and research group's evaluation percentage score by 20% and convert it into a comprehensive test score.

Article 5 Assessment Level and Result Processing: The teacher's teaching business assessment shall be determined according to the assessment points for each semester as excellent, good, qualified and poor. Weighted average scores greater than or equal to 90 points can be rated as excellent; between 70-89 points is good; between 60-69 points is qualified; below 60 points is poor.

The semester teaching quality award and other types of rewards and punishments are linked to the assessment results. The assessment is awarded to those who have excellent grades, and several of them are tested after the assessment. For the second consecutive semester, the final name will be temporarily disqualified.

Article 6 Organizational Leadership: Under the leadership of the school party committee and principal's office, the teacher's teaching business assessment shall be led by the Academic Affairs Office. Teaching quality assessment is an important task in the construction of the school's faculty. The relevant assessment staff must adhere to the principle, act impartially, and must not falsify, such as violations of discipline and discipline, must be strictly handled.

Article 7 The right to interpret this assessment method belongs to the school.