Research on Improving and Perfecting the Nomination of Candidates for Vacancy in Party and Government Leadership

Research on Improving and Perfecting the Nomination of Candidates for Vacancy in Party and Government Leadership

Democracy recommendation is the first program and basic work for the election of party and government leading cadres. It is the first "can" for us to choose and use cadres, and it is also the beginning of our identification of cadres. Therefore, democratic recommendations are crucial in the work of cadres. In the work of cadres, we often have to make democratic recommendations, especially when there are vacancies in party and government leadership positions, we often determine candidates through democratic recommendations. How to improve and improve the nomination of candidates for vacancies in party and government leadership positions is an issue that we need to constantly explore in the work of cadres. Here are some superficial understandings.

I. Problems in the current democratic recommendation work for vacant candidates for party and government leading cadres

1. Not enough democracy

The lack of democracy is mainly manifested in the recommendation. It does not fully promote democracy and listen to the true will of the majority of the people. The specific performance is as follows:

First, the lack of representation of the participants in the recommendation, and some of the randomness is still very large. Some of the organizers have done their hands and feet, and the referees are those who have a good relationship with the recommended subjects.

Second, the method is inadequate. Some comrades have simple and rough methods of operation, and all the referees are concentrated in a small space, causing some people with different opinions to be forced to "tick" according to the "situation" and "environment".

Third, the organization personnel department failed to promptly and timely verify and verify the problems of the cadres, and promptly responded to the public's satisfaction. To a certain extent, it affected the enthusiasm of the people to tell the truth and tell the truth, thus causing some people to suffer. Touching emotions, even into the recommendation of individual conversations, either not talking about it, or understatement, only talking about the difference, so that the organization personnel can not fully understand the actual situation of the referee.

2, recommended distortion

Insufficient democracy in the recommendation may lead to distortion of the recommendation, but the recommended distortion is not necessarily because democracy is not enough. There are other reasons:

First, in the recommendation of a large number of people, some comrades mistakenly recommend cadres to be "sea elections" cadres. Whoever they want to choose, the democratic votes are scattered, everyone has a share, it is difficult to distinguish between good and bad, no effect. Other comrades do not use their minds in their work. On the eve of recommending cadres, they inquire, run relationships, and draw votes. As a result, some people take care of their faces, take care of relationships, and disregard organizational discipline and principles, acting as "good people" and making recommendations. The failure to vote has not fully reflected the wishes of the people.

First, the understanding is not in place and the work is absolutely absolute. It is advisable to vote for people and simply equate public opinion with the number of votes.

Second, the phenomenon of cronyism still exists. Due to the imperfect and unsatisfactory recommendation mechanism, there are still some unhealthy phenomena in the selection of a small number of people among the actual operations. It is often recommended that the comrades in the current leadership and the leading bodies in the leading organs. Due to the "short-term" effect of individual leaders, the promotion of a group of cadres will leave people, and the tracking of accountability mechanisms is not clear, which has led a very small number of leading cadres to personalize organizational issues and commoditize cadres for a little personal gain. Responsibly recommend some cadres with poor overall quality to represent the wishes of the people.

Third, most of the current public recommendation, evaluation and evaluation results are feedback to the unit leaders, and they are not disclosed to the public, so the transparency is not high, which affects the enthusiasm of the people to participate and tell the truth to a certain extent.

Second, ways and countermeasures to improve and improve the recommendation work for vacant candidates in the party and government leadership positions

1. Innovate democratic institutions and enhance democratic awareness

2, improve the recommended way, improve the recommended method

Organizational recommendation, public recommendation and personal self-recommendation are combined to increase personal self-recommendation.

3. Standardize the recommendation system and improve the quality of recommendation

Establish a system of recommendation accountability.

Specifically, the recommendation responsibility investigation system is established for organizational recommendation and personal recommendation. After the recommended cadre is appointed, there are more serious problems within 2 years. According to the circumstances and specific circumstances, the recommenders are given disciplinary action.

Implement a publicity system for recommendation results.

After the recommendation process is over, the organization department shall promptly disclose the results of the recommendations formed by the inspection team and understand the specific conditions of the referees such as morality, energy, diligence, and performance to the public and accept the supervision of the public. Really from the first program of selecting cadres, it will establish a "People's Pass" and improve the transparency of cadre work. Truly establishing the people is the main concept of selecting and hiring people, so that the principle of "recognition of the people" is truly implemented, let the people of the people recommend cadres according to their own wishes, and let the cadres decided by the organization get the approval of the people, thus maintaining and improving the party. The prestige among the people of the people has been recognized by the people of the people and the authenticity of public opinion is guaranteed.

Improve the supervision system for the recommendation work.

It is necessary to give full play to the supervisory and safeguarding functions of the discipline inspection department and the cadre supervision department of the organization department, carry out full supervision of the recommendation work, earnestly accept the people's letters and visits on the recommendation work of the cadres, and promptly investigate and deal with violations of laws and regulations in the recommendation work of the cadres.