Implementing fine management and realizing party building ideological and political work

Implementing fine management, realizing party building ideological and political work

Qdfj

"The big things in the world must be done in detail." Fine management has been accepted by more and more business managers. However, how to use fine management methods to improve the level of ideological and political work in grassroots party building, there is still a lack of necessary exploration and experiment. This paper tries to apply some kind of superficial thinking on the implementation of fine management in the ideological and political work of party building.

First, grassroots party building ideological and political work needs to introduce fine management

Fine management is a higher level concept than regular management. At present, the definition of fine management in modern enterprises is “five fines and four fines”, namely: essence, essence, fineness, proficient, precise, subdivided objects, subdivided functions and positions, detailed decomposition of each specific work, detailed management system Various implementation links. Simply understand that "fine" can be understood as better, better, and better; "fine" can be interpreted as more specific, fine-handed, and don't donate. The most basic characteristics of fine management are detailing, heavy process, heavy foundation, specificity, re-implementation, heavy quality, heavy effect, paying attention to everything, focusing on each detail and striving for the best.

Management is the eternal theme of any organization. The grassroots party building ideological and political work itself is also a kind of management. However, the management methods and management thinking cannot be static. The management form is increasingly showing the trend of accelerating development due to the influx of a large number of advanced management cultures. Compared with the development of the situation and tasks, some limitations and shortcomings in the management of ideological and political work at the grassroots level have become more and more obvious. On the one hand, the ideological and political work of grassroots party building is still dominated by extensive and empirical management, and there is still a lack of refreshing and enjoyable management methods. Comparing the connotation of “Five Fines”, in recent years we have made some progress in the relatively simple aspects of corporate culture construction, but the gap is still very large. The simplest example is the attraction, influence and appeal of party building ideological and political work. On the one hand, the management of ideological and political work at the grassroots level of the party is more focused on the foundation, focusing on the external form, lacking the precise grasp of the service object and the meticulous examination of the service effectiveness. There are many things that are large and more complex. The content of quantitative implementation and quantitative assessment is small, which makes it difficult to achieve closed-loop grasp of every subdivision of party building ideological and political work.

To solve these problems, we must conduct in-depth exploration in the spirit of reform. It is necessary to learn from the advanced management culture of modern enterprises and improve the management methods of grassroots party building ideological and political work. Fine management is an advanced management culture and management tool. From the concept of fine management, we can see that it basically conforms to the management needs of the ideological and political work of party building and plays a positive role in improving and strengthening the ideological and political work of party building. First, fine management pays attention to humanity, people-oriented, and texts, which is the foundation of party building ideological and political work. Second, fine management pays attention to detail control and process management, and attaches importance to "doing things not greedy, not being small," which is consistently advocated by party building ideological and political work. Third, fine management pays attention to fine work, attaches importance to creating the best in each link, and strives for first-class. This is the consistent pursuit of party building ideological and political work. At the same time, the characteristics of fine management, specific implementation, re-implementation, and effectiveness are conducive to improving the practical problems of party building ideological and political work content is too broad, assessment is difficult to quantify, and poor results are not tested. Therefore, it is necessary for us to make some explorations and attempts in introducing fine management.

Second, the implementation of fine management should solve three problems in advance

Fine management, like other management methods, is a relatively complex system engineering with many management factors and extremely strict requirements on the management, executive level and corresponding management system level. Through studying and thinking, I feel that we must implement fine management at the grassroots party building ideological and political work, and we should focus on solving the three problems of concept, carrier and assessment in advance.

1. Innovate ideas and solve problems. The first is the concept of management. Whether the management can achieve excellence in research, planning, and deployment of party building ideological and political work, can we fully consider the needs of the client and the ability of the executive layer, and whether the carrier of the design has operational, energy-based decomposition and assessment. In particular, can we insist on the unity of responsible and responsible for the above, and truly combine the requirements of superiors with their own actualities to form specific and not complicated implementation measures of this unit. This is by no means a simple method problem, but an ideological concept and an ideological style. Especially at the grassroots station, the management's plans, opinions, etc., there is no need to let the branch study how to implement it, but to clearly tell them what to do and what not to do. This problem is not solved well, and fine management must be a piece of paper. The second is the concept of the executive level. Can the executive layer accurately understand and accurately implement the requirements of the superiors? Can it not be discounted? Can you take real responsibility in the work, be meticulous and strive for perfection? This is also a great challenge to ideas and attitudes.

2, innovative ideas, solve the carrier problem. Party building ideological and political work requires the carrier to achieve it. For the carrier design of fine management conditions, the basic principle should be heavy quality and light quantity. This is a certain gap from our current working status. A simple analogy can be used to subdivide a work or activity carrier into seminars, plans, arrangements, inspections, assessments, rewards and punishments for the same purpose, and to implement two or more carriers. It is self-evident that the refinement is decomposed into the human head, which one is more "fine" and which one is more "fine". This requires the management to overcome the idea of ​​ignoring the actual greed when studying the design carrier. Do not use two problems that can be solved with one carrier. At present, some grassroots units always complain that the carrier is not well implemented. This is not the above problem. The key point is that their own ideas are not clear enough, and they are not deeply comprehended and fully integrated. To implement fine management, this state must be overcome.

3. Innovate the system and solve the assessment problem. Assessment has always been a difficult problem in party building ideological and political work, but it is not "there is no solution to this problem." If you have the concept and ideas of fine management, institutional innovation will inevitably lead to a new path, and the problem of assessment will be solved. Fine management requires almost the most demanding system. Every job, every detail, every process, anytime, anywhere, there must be a corresponding system to restrict and assess. To solve the problem of the assessment of party building ideological and political work, it is necessary to adopt such a method. For example, how do the ideological and political work of the employees, the management's ideas and plans are formed, and the methods and methods are in line with the actual situation of the employees? These problems cannot be pursued until the implementation level has implemented the effect, but when the research and development plan is made, there must be institutional constraints, supervision and assessment. Whether the system is in place or not directly affects the degree of fine management. It is the core, the most detailed, and the most difficult to implement fine management. It is a key issue that must be solved.

Third, the implementation of fine management should be tested with "real" as the standard

Fine management is the means to improve and strengthen the ideological and political work of the party building, truly realize the virtual work, and better play the role of party building ideological and political work in the construction of the two civilizations of enterprises. Therefore, the key to verifying the effectiveness of fine management in the ideological and political work of grassroots party building depends on whether this work is more concrete and practical than before, and whether it is more effective.

This "real" should look at five aspects: First, whether the carrier of party building ideological and political work is more realistic. If this carrier is called "flowering shelf" and "the same set" from the birth of the carrier, it does not meet the requirements of the party organization at the higher level, and certainly does not conform to the connotation of fine management. The second is to see whether the implementation measures of party building ideological and political work are more realistic. Is it overcoming the problems of "copying and copying, getting up and down in general", "implementing archives through archives, and implementing meetings with conferences", whether it is realistic, concrete and highly operational. If these measures are at a loss at the executive level, or if the executive layer needs to spend more energy to study how to implement it, this cannot be said to be fine management. The third is to see whether the behavior of management and executive level implementation is more realistic. Fine management has the same requirements for management and executive level, that is, to strive for excellence. The implementation of the behavior can best reflect the impact of management on people. In the fine management environment, both the management and the executive level should be the model of the execution system in the implementation of the division of labor, and they should all have the attitude and style of “not to swear by the end”. The fourth is to see if the job assessment is more realistic. Is there still some projects that cannot be assessed? In the assessment, there is still room for "good old people", and there is no difference in the assessment of good differences. If the answer is yes, the system construction does not meet the requirements of fine management. The fifth is to see if the role played by the client is more real. This problem can also be quantified. For example, if the company is satisfied with the ideological and political work of the party building, is it a positive impetus to the management of the business; seeing whether the workers and the public support the party building ideological and political work, can they talk about the staff’s heart and do things to the employees? Where it is needed; at a certain stage, the work objectives of the unit can not be achieved as scheduled.

At present, fine management has produced a very significant effect in railway safety production management. Heavy details, heavy foundations, heavy processes, "grasping small enlargement", etc., have become the inherent requirements of strong standards and standard management, and promote the steady development of safe production. It also played a more significant role in business management, especially in cost control. However, whether fine management can be implemented in the ideological and political work of party building still requires in-depth thinking and bold exploration.