Final report format

After the social science topic is basically completed, it is necessary to write a final report. There is no fixed format for the completion of the report, but there is a rough framework. The subject completion report is different from the subject report. The report focuses on the presentation of research results, while the completion report focuses on the review process and evaluation results. From the perspective of applied writing, the topic report can be divided into five parts: title, preface, body, ending and auxiliary files.

First, the title of the final report:
Project name and language - conclusion report.

2. Preface to the final report:
Briefly describe the topic, including the source and level of the project, the duration, and the overall evaluation of the results of the project and its significance.

Third, the body of the final report:
It mainly consists of three parts.

The general situation of the subject, expound the background of the topic; specify the objectives, research ideas and principles; explain the research duration and stage, and analyze the main work and characteristics of each stage.

The research results of the subject briefly clarify the basic viewpoints and logical connections of the subject; highlight the characteristics and innovations of the subject; emphasize the relevance of the subject and practice, and even the phased results applied in the practical work.

Evaluation opinions of the subject, self-evaluation——According to the theoretical research and actual work status of the domestic and foreign regions, the regions and similar units, the correct position of the subject is given, and the role and prospect of the research results are revealed.

Expert evaluation - Review the experts' opinions on this topic and point out typical reviews.

Evaluation of practitioners - If the subject has been applied in practice, feedback from practitioners can be given.

Fourth, the end of the report:
For the problems related to this topic, point out the direction of further exploration; the issue of the application of this topic, etc., indicates the efforts that the research team needs to make. The writing at the end should be based on the situation.

V. Attached files of the final report:
List the members of the research group; attach the published papers in the course of the research, the supporting materials that have been adopted or started to be applied, and other materials such as acknowledgments.

The above-mentioned final report may be appropriately modified according to the expert opinion after the end of the appraisal meeting. Then signed by the team leader and signed. According to the level of the subject level, the size of the research results, and the depth of the researchers' understanding, the report will be unique, but the overall requirement is to reflect the whole picture and highlight the key points. Reflecting the whole picture, the writer is required to grasp the "full path" trajectory from the project to the completion of the project, grasp the target's intended goals, explore the center of gravity and the "vegan" joints of the research results, and grasp the opinions of the researchers, evaluators and even practitioners. Highlighting the key points requires not only highlighting the innovative features of the research results, but also highlighting the comments that have been made in practice and the predictions that will be effective.

Common problems and countermeasures in the final report I. Common problems in the final report
1. From the research progress, some lack of narrative materials for some research and exploration processes. For example, an investigation report, a basic situation research report, an acceptance application, and the like.

2. From the summary of the topic, some basic information is partially incomplete; some places lack the data and processes that should be available; some have certain results, but lack the materials for promotion.

3. From the report, there are three main problems: First, the lack of citations or citations, can not see the innovation theory derived through research and the difference or connection between the theory and the theory supporting experimental research; The person in charge of the project showed the experimental research results of the school's regular teaching activities as a subject, giving people a feeling of reluctance to make up the materials. Third, some project leaders took the results before the project was established as the experimental research results after the project was established.

4. From the conclusion of the study, most of the conclusion reports or papers lack theoretical sublimation. There is no in-depth and meticulous research and refinement on materials and papers. There is no theoretical improvement. The conclusion report only sees “materials” and “views”. Pale can't convince people, but it's not operational, it can't be extended.

5. From the attached information, there are also two major issues worth noting: First, some attached survey reports or scientific papers are not standardized; second, some research papers are relatively rough, not only the text is not standardized, but the content is not substantial.

·Scientific research report ·Dayu final report ·Subject report ·How to write a report

2. Points to note when writing a final report
1. See more about the support theory cited in the project and the relevant new information at home and abroad in recent years.

2. Carefully read the research progress plan when the project is established, and try to find the process exploration and research materials at each stage.

3. Re-examine the entire experimental research process, especially the perspectives in the experimental research papers.

4. Integrate all research materials, carry out scientific induction and deduction, and extract the innovative ideas of the subject as much as possible, instead of listing the general views that “you have everything I have”.