The graduation thesis format requirements of the Adult Education College

In order to unify the format of the graduation thesis of our college, the format of the graduation thesis is as follows:

First, the number of graduation thesis should generally be between 3000 and 6000 words. The a4 paper should be printed and bound in a unified manner, and the papers should be printed out and delivered to the class teacher at the specified time.

Second, the cover: "Wenzhou University adult education undergraduate thesis" Song body small number one; the title of the paper is the black body small one; "name", "instructor", "professional, class", "completion date" for Song Xiaoxiao On the 2nd, all contents are in the middle.

Third, the page settings:

1. The margins are set to: Top: 2.5cm Down: 2.5cm Left: 2.8cm Right: 2.8cm

2. Line spacing is set to: 1.5 times the line spacing

Fourth, the body part:

1. All contents of the catalog and catalog pages are required to be completed with Xiao No. 4 and Song.

2. The title is in bold, number three, bold; empty one line, class and name with imitation Song, No. 4,

Empty two lines; "abstract" is bold, number four, bold, the content of the abstract is Song, No. 4; another line, "keyword" is bold, number four, bold, the content of the keyword is Song, four No. There are two spaces between the keywords, and the number of words in the summary content does not exceed 150 words.

3. The text and the keyword are empty and one line, the headline in the text is in the Song, the fourth, bold; the subtitle is in the Song, the small four, bold; the other body part is in the Song Dynasty.

V. References:

Book reference format:

Serial number, author, title, place of publication: publishing time, such as:

"1" xx, on "three represents." Beijing: Central Literature Publishing House, XX.

Journal class reference format:

Serial number, author, article title, magazine name publishing house, year, volume, page.

"3" Liu Zhifeng, Major Issues in Chinese Government Agencies, Strategy and Management, 1999, p. 10

Paper grade evaluation criteria

excellent

1. The thesis is clear, the arguments are substantial, and there are certain creative insights.

2, can comprehensively apply professional theoretical knowledge, the collected data is complete and rich, the reference data is accurate, and the chart is clear and correct. Strong analytical, computational and argumentation skills.

3, the text is smooth, organized, reasonable structure, format meets the requirements.

good

1. The viewpoint of the thesis is clear. It can analyze the problem and solve the problem with the theoretical knowledge of the professional, and have its own opinions.

2. The data is complete, the data is complete, and the chart is clear and correct. Have a certain ability of analysis, calculation and argumentation.

3, the text is smooth, well-organized, and the format meets the requirements.

medium

1. The viewpoint of the thesis is relatively clear. There is no error in using the theoretical knowledge of the professional to analyze the problem and solve the problem.

2, the data is more complete, the data is still complete, the chart is clearer. Have a certain ability of analysis, calculation and argumentation.

3, the text is more fluent, well-organized, the argument has a certain persuasive power, the format meets the requirements.

Pass

1. The viewpoint of the paper is basically correct. There is no scientific error in using the theoretical knowledge of the professional to analyze and solve problems.

2. There is a certain amount of data collected and certain data, but the conclusion is not sufficient. The chart is basically correct.

3, the text is basically fluent, the organization is basically clear, the argument can still explain the point of view, the format basically meets the requirements.

failed

1. The conclusion is vague or serious, and there are scientific errors in applying the theoretical knowledge of the subject.

2, the data is poor, can not prove the argument, the data is messy, the chart is unclear, the analysis, calculation and argumentation ability is poor.

3, the text is not smooth, the format does not meet the requirements.

4. Those who copy other people's works, according to the failure theory.